look guys, i'm having anal sex in a sad movie!
>>213787279 (OP)the only thing enjoyable about that movie is that Silverman was pretty hot in the Premiere
I just read the plot of this movie on the wiki and, uhhh what the fuck?
>>213787279 (OP)I don't like Josh Charles. Never have.
>>213787279 (OP)Is anal sex in movies ever portrayed in a non-generate way and just as something happening.
No but seriously what the fuck even was this movie? I watched it because someone told me she was naked in it and I still don't know what the fuck the point of this shit was.
>>213787585she plays this part straight because she was trying to pass as a serious actress
>She got a SAG award nomination for best actress for this piece of shit
>Zero other nominations for it
lel She had some powerful friends in Hollywood but not powerful enough. Emma Stone won it for La La Land.
Smells like fucking diarrhea in here! Did somebody step in shit?
>>213788050really? well comedians doing drama always have some buzz.
>>213788242it's ok, it's framed as hot. but there are better anal scenes in movies
I enjoyed watching the guy bash her stupid fucking head.
the best sex scene is in Little Children, it's very brief.
if you want better anal scenes in movies you have to watch european cinema