>Unsinkable ship.
>Sinks.
What was james cameron trying to tell us?
>name your ship after a movie where a ship hits an iceberg and sinks
>your ship hits an iceberg and sinks
If they used the oceangate sub, the movie woulda been over quicker.
jews sank it to kill off the people blocking the creation of the federal reserve
>>213867172You really this far gone?
Damn.
>>213867446I mean he does have a point
>berg
>>213867172i like this theory. it asserts that the captain knew exactly how to hit the iceberg in such a way that it would sink the ship despite the water-tight bulkheads and then played it as an accident.
>>213866635 (OP)Not even the marketing said it was unsinkable, it was just an exaggerated meme that got out of control.
>>213867172https://youtu.be/duXKTnOj6aQ?=pspkMIAc8_sU0hgC
>the actual titanic sinking was closer to the release date of the movie than the release date of the movie is to now
>>213867845I was born in 1988.
I am not 40 yet.
So your math might be wrong.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_the_Mail_Steamer_Went_Down_in_Mid_Atlantic_by_a_Survivor
Really makes you think
>>213867172Actually they swapped it with the Olympic and sunk that one instead, because the Olympic was damaged and insurance didn't cover it
>>213867656I don't like that I actually had to stop and think about this for a second
Stop, my unsinkable ship!