apparently EA/DICE dont know why people liked bad company 2

Because it was dumbed down battlefield that appealed to the mentally challenged?

>>712546481 (OP)
Releasing BC2 on PC was a huge mistake. EA realised that PCfags eat any slop, with right name on it.

>>712546481 (OP)
What's so good about BC2 which wasn't surpassed by BF3 already? Hard mode:
No TTK

>>712548939
Only played bf3 and on nut didnt bc2 have the best destruction?

>>712546481 (OP)
I liked it because, unlike Call of Duty, I could blow buildings up and drive vehicles easily. The basic Soldier class also had his face covered up and I like it when I can't see any human on my humans.

>>712549047
Destruction of BC2 is a meme. It's good but you can destroy buildings and make MCOMs udefusable. Also servers with more than 30 minute time limit turned into sniper/heli farms.

>>712546481 (OP)
if you guys liked BFBC 2 so much, you'd still play it. you faggots just love the nostalgia of gaming in the early 2010s. otherwise the project rome servers wouldn't be dead

>>712551090
>just play the same game forever, goy

>>712546481 (OP)
bc2 was fun when it came out but plays like actaual dogshit nowadays. bf3/4 are superior in every way

>>712546481 (OP)
Sure they fucking do. Every battlefield they released after BC2 has been a BC sequel instead of a BF game. Don't fucking tell me these snowniggers didn't know what they were doing.

>>712548939
Sound design.
>loading rocket into rpg and hearing it scrape against the top of the launcher

>>712551520
>the russian LAV sound from its main turret