MindsEye | Reviews

5 - GameStar
5 - GamingBolt
4 - IGN
4 - Guardian
4 - Press Start
4 - The Beta Network
3 - Gamespot
3 - Push Square
2.5 - TechRaptor
2/5 - GamesRadar
2/5 - GameReactor UK
1.5/5 - Digital Trends
1/5 - Eurogamer

>giving a fuck about anyone opinion
retarded underage

dios mio, la chupacabra de california

>Blockchain devs
>Game is shit
many such cases

>>712835121
This, the game is a masterpiece

The ending to this shit is laugh out loud funny.

>>712834880 (OP)
i feel like like i just got unfrozen into a random time period, because ive literally never heard ANYTHING about this game up until the last week but it was apparently meant to be huge? i dont even know what kind of game its supposed to be

>>712834880 (OP)
If this game was made by Rockstar it'd have gotten a 10/10.

I think it's fine really.

Just got the part where the cyborg man kills Charlie. PS5 says I'm 80% done.

It has some bugs, but no more than Bethesda games on launch. It has some "padding by distance" but that's just kind of western AAA generally. They do love long stretches.

I don't know I just really can't complain. Kind of on you to set you expectations high for a clearly mid game.

On clearly mid games with expectations setting, Alone in the Dark remake is on PS+ that's a mid buggy good also.

>>712838063
It looked like a middle term between GTA and cyberpunk.

>>712838063
it's only gotten big because it's the new punching bag, nobody would be talking about it otherwise

I beat it. They need to make the shooting better and fix the performance and its a 5/10.

>>712837109
Elaborate, I'm not going to play it

>>712834880 (OP)
>not even Mafia-like fake free roam
>no crime system/police, no ability to steal cars
>a GTA precursor from 1999 allows more player freedom when completing missions

Remind me when its discounted to $5, the mission editor seems to worth that much

lol

Why do they keep having close ups of the protagonist's face? This dude is ugly as hell

>>712843707
to keep you awake while playing

>>712838063
I had never heard anything about Clair Obscur until release, I found it extremely suspicious that everyone was praising it to high heaven
But then I pirated it and I kinda wish I had bought it because it's kino
(this post was paid for by Tencent)

I watched my streamer play it
The first 3 big plot twist moments happen when MC gets blown back from an explosion aimed at someone/something else, is harmless.
joke game.

>>712838063
Everybody is just pointing and laughing at how bad it is and at the developers' hubris.

>hurr durr GTA killer from the former GTA producer
>hurr durr nextgen gaming
>durr hurr all negative press is paid Rockstar shills

>actual game is pretty much a mediocre linear shooter with abysmal performance, constant crashes and braindead AI

>/v/eddit cares about games journalist reviews now
Pathetic.

>>712834880 (OP)
The guy in the front looks like he regularly hangs out in a bathroom stall with a glory hole.

>>712834880 (OP)
Moistcritical shat on this game so I'm fairly certain it's terrible

>>712847574
How do you know what guys who regularly hang around glory holes look like?

>>712834880 (OP)
it's hilarious to me that gaming media is so paid for and used as a tool to solely push agenda that they're all ignoring the story of how they showed the game to people 3 weeks prior to release and it ran like shit with them claiming they'd have it fixed by launch and then them trying to come out ahead of the game release and claim any negative word of mouth was from rockstar shills lol.

>>712834880 (OP)
>in a world where reviews are only 7/8/9/10
>Mindseye gets 3-5
Mindseye literally just fixed and recalibrated the gaming industry

>>712847940
What agenda is the media pushing with this game?

>>712847940
>the story of how they showed the game to people 3 weeks prior to release and it ran like shit with them claiming they'd have it fixed by launch and then them trying to come out ahead of the game release and claim any negative word of mouth was from rockstar shills lol.
What exactly do you think the stoey is here? CEO lies about their product? That happens every day

>>712848134
"Pay up or we won't give you good reviews", obviously.

>>712848247
either you're too retarded to see what I'm talking about or you're one of the paid jeets running damage control for this flop of a game. which is it?