Thread 712840759

i know ill get shit for this but I cant tell when a game is running past like 70 fps

>>712841118
I can tell when a game's running at 60 and drops to 40 for more than a couple seconds. I can not notice anything above 60.

>>712841118
Are you only playing turn based JRPGs?

how do i look less ugly?

>>712841326
no, even doom dark age I didn't feel needed to be pushed past 60fps.

>>712840759 (OP)
i just want to run games at such fps, that even the drops wont be noticeable

>>712841118
I can tell but only up to 130 or so. Beyond that it gets increasingly hard to notice the difference unless you spin the camera around very quickly.

>>712841582
>doom dark ages
there's your problem you sissy soiboi libatrd

>>712840759 (OP)
>fps dipped from 60 to 59.57 in my uguu animu porn VN, better set the resolution to 640x480, turn on VRR and DLSS and upscale to 720p to make it playable.

It's bespoke... but it's what was spoke is the issue...

>>712841643
lolwut?

>>712841118
I struggle to notice drops in the mid 50's.

>>712841764
>lolwut
where u belong is reddit no 4chan kek

>>712841350
lose weight

>>712841582
For me FPP games need around 100FPS. That also depends on how much input lag the game has.
I haven't played the newest DooT but that games is incapable of running at high framerate.

>>712841118
You won't notice any difference beyond 90 FPS. 120+ FPS is only for competitive gaming, where you really need that 2 millisecond advantage.

>>712841886
fuck u dooms good, all of them. Old and new. Yes even doom 3

>>712841350
get bracers

>>712841971
No, YOU won't notice it.

>>712840759 (OP)
I unironically regret buying a 165hz monitor because now locked 60fps games feel like garbage and are unplayable

>>712842565
just set it to 120fps

>>712840759 (OP)
>be ugly
>show your face online
why? Is it lack of self awareness? You know that people will take you less seriously when you're ugly.
I'm gonna be called "cringe" for assuming that you have to worry about your appearance in public broadcasting, but that's the truth.

>>712842671
Stills feel like shit, it's not a monitor problem it's the fact I can't go back to sub 100fps now because games feel laggy now when they weren't when I hadn't discovered the world of 60+hz

>>712842738
You need to get out more.

>>712840759 (OP)
Thank god VRR exists.

>>712840759 (OP)
game has open world tarversal hitches

>>712842856
talking to the common men outside and being live television are two different things

>>712842984
being on live television*

>>712842565
Some games have awful input lag at 60FPS while others don't feel nearly as bad.
But I take game with stable 60FPS over a game with 120FPS average and constant stutters.

>712842738
he probably has more sex than you do

>>712842738
>self reporting self conscious Anon

>>712841971
>You won't notice any difference beyond 90 FPS.
go to bed unc

>>712843328 meant for >>712842738

>>712841971
90 FPS is a good sweet spot for me. I notice higher FPS but it doesn't affect my play outside of fast paced multiplayer shooters..
>>712842965
I really don't mind traversal stuttering as much as DF. They complain about it in Returnal but it only occurs in the interstitial areas between combat so I couldn't give a shit.

>>712843476
nuh uh it wasn't
I didn't make a mistake

>>712842738
>Virgin jealous about his ugly peers having a successful social life

>RT: ON
>DLSS: Ultra
>TAA: Max
>Chromatic Aberration: On
>Depth of Field: Max
>Motion Blur: Max
>Per-Object Motion Blur: On
>Framerate: 30
Yep, it's gaming time

>>712840759 (OP)
I would happily never play a game above 60fps forever if every art director who ever implemented anti-soul gas was executed

>>712844579
Meds?

>>712840759 (OP)
Noine years.

>>712840759 (OP)
Shit better lock it to 30 just in case

>>712840759 (OP)
I'd model a band of orcs after these guys, they're somewhat charismatic

>>712846730
Wichard, John and Oli as orcs does sound funny

>>712845887
Don't forget turning on motion blur at the highest possible setting

how do autists cope with the fact that they didn't care about framerate until like 2014 and mysteriously they stopped enjoying games as much at around that same time

>>712840759 (OP)
mfw

>>712841350
I replied to ditch the soul patch and he actually did it, the absolute madman.

>>712847417
this dude has been doing this for ages. I saw his name in a Sega Magazine from like 1995

>>712840759 (OP)
119fps! Better drop it to 90 or 60.

>>712841350
Be yourself

>>712848117
or the bespoke 40fps mode

>>712841118
Everyone notices it.
Play Quake 1 for 15 minutes at 144 frames per second and then reduce it to 120 frames per second. You will immediately notice that the movement is no longer "smooth". In fact, this also happens if you're playing at 170 frames per second and drop it to 144. Your brain simply gets used to any frame rate after a while, and you'll only really start to be unable to see the difference when the frame rate is extremely high. Something like 1200 frames per second, and then limiting it to 1100 frames per second, you probably won't notice anything, but when we're talking about 60, 120, 240, even fucking 500 frames per second, any human being is fully capable of noticing the difference.

>>712840759 (OP)
why is he so based

>>712840759 (OP)
>mfw when 30 fps is good

>>712844579
>I would happily never play a game above 60fps
Why 60? Don't you see that this is an arbitrary number adopted because of certain technologies that became standard for a while? Why not 72 frames per second? Or 90 frames per second? If you're playing at 60fps and you lock a game at 90fps, you'll immediately notice a significant improvement. I think it's much more reasonable to consider 90fps as the "minimum viable" than 60fps, even though 90fps isn't even close to conveying a perfect sense of movement in a game.

>>712840759 (OP)
>I am not mad about FFXVI being a 30fps game because the amazing motion blur
What the fuck is his problem?

>>712843467
It is physically impossible. If you are playing single player games with more than 90 FPS, then you are literally a retard.

>>712848796
It's arbitrary, but 60 just happens to have been the convergence point where console standards and PC standards merged. Before then 70Hz was the "standard" but no PC on the planet could update the framebuffer at that rate AND do any processing at the same time so nobody was playing games at a stable anything let alone 70. Consoles were 60 locked (except for slowdown prone shmups) then shit went sideways when everything was cross platform UE trash and 25-30 became the norm. And here was the PC suddenly out of left field being able to run console games at proper console framerates at the native res of said consoles, the way the consoles themselves couldn't even get close to. And then 60 was "normal."
And soon 120 should be normal when even a jumped up handheld is treating it as the expected TV output, with DLSS bullshit to make it "real" surely just around the corner. At which point if you aren't getting real 120fps on your PC port, then what are you doing with your life?

>any game that's running over 120 is controlling smoothly with the mouse
>game is locked at 60 or 30 fps
>feels painful to play with the mouse
>plays fine if I'm using a gamepad
fast camera movements under 60 fps are fucking horror when using a mouse

>set uncapped fps
>goes from 90-140
>cap it at 60
>drops to 55

>>712848592
>You will immediately notice that the movement is no longer "smooth"
this is called input lag/latency

>>712849897
This happens to me constantly and I don't fucking get it. Can anyone explain what causes this?

>>712850706
If you’re artificially lowering your frame limit outside of the game engine it can sometimes cause frame delivery issues and increased latency. If the game has internal options to cap that’s almost always the best place to do it. Also, why not cap at 65 frames then?

>>712850706
Limiting the frame rate means the GPU is idling some of the time, creating inefficiency. Imagine having to rev up an engine constantly.

>>712841118
oh wow let me guess you have a 70hz display retard

>>712853186
No, my retard caps at 22. The human eye can only see 24, but he’s missing a couple.

>>712841118
It depends on the game. First person? I refuse to believe you can't tell.

>>712840759 (OP)
>lock it at buttery smooth 30 fps!
I literally stooped following the channel because of this. Happy that I did, they are such stupid, ugly faggots.

>>712841971
I dread getting old, unironically

Is this cunt going to start shilling that 40fps is the new 60fps cus of VRR now that it's a feature on Switch 2?

>>712849897
>>712850706
You can average a higher framerate even with ms framespikes that bring you to what's "55" fps. FPS is only an average measure per second, but actual game performance is much more sporadic.

>>712853686
He's still running on cathode ray thoughts while the rest of us moved to OLED emotions. Probably still thinks 300 baud modem screeches are music too.

>>712840759 (OP)
>Hey John, what beer do you want?
>This reminds me, they sell beer in Japan, I was asking for beer in japanese and they had it! It's one of those funny language things.

>>712840759 (OP)
1080p and 60 FPS is correct for literally everything and graphics whores pushing for more are killing gaming and are useful idiots for Big Chip

>>712841118
>>712841315
eyelets

>>712841971
>competitive gaming
AIDS riddled cancer for the absolute worst faggots to ever blight video games. Yes, worse than the brown obese tr00ns.

>>712844579
Fog exists, you whiny faggot

60fps is my minimum.
Always has been always will be.

CHOOSE YOUR GAMER PHENOTYPE

>>712854076
you're already old, boomer

>>712840759 (OP)
"This appears to be the result of the developers relying on a non-anisotropic code execution rendering solution, rather than the often superior, albeit much maligned, frontend option, such as in 2015's criminally underrated Crypt of the Serpent King."

>>712840759 (OP)
Is this some pc component rating youtuber or something?

>>712840759 (OP)
I have the same hairline and hair type. How do I make sure mine doesn't look as bad as his?

>>712857152
The lack of representation here is problematic. Where is the skinny, pale, tall, and balding white guy like me?

>>712842738
embarrassing post

>>712857152
UNCLE FESTER
N
C
L
E
F
E
S
T
E
R

>>712842565
I put off getting a monitor for the longest time partly because I was afraid of becoming like this, luckily it was just oversensitive retards blowing it out of proportion all along, just a few minutes at most and 60 is alright

>>712841118
as someone playing games on a laptop with 20-30 fps i can immediately tell anything past 100

>>712854076
just volunteer for being shot into a volcano or something if you're done with life
mortality really is a gift

>>712840759 (OP)
>molests another boy

>>712847871
And you were right to. He looks better with a full beard than the shitty patch.

>>712858540
mega man 2 stance

>>712842565
I dont regret buying one, just a little disappointed because the difference aint that great.

>>712859982
KINO

>>712858540
When did he molest the first one?

>>712859982
bespoke video editing

>>712840759 (OP)
I hate to ask, but can I get a qrd on this guy?

I see people posting this dude now and then along with FPS dips. What's the story?

>>712844579
is top right good? ive been waiting for a sale

>>712858540
>This misinformation again
It's a different person with the same name.

>>712862328
He works for Digital Foundry and has an autistic hyperfixation with consistent frame time. Basically, your monitor's refresh rate NEEDS to be evenly divisible by your game's frame rate for this faggot to be happy. For example, If a game is rendering 59 frames per second on a monitor that refreshes 60 times per second, some of those frames will be displayed for longer than other ones. This triggers John's 'tism, so if a game can't quite hit 60, he insists on locking it to 30 so that each frame is displayed for an equal amount of time.

>>712841118
the eyes can’t perceive past 30fps and anyone who tells you otherwise is a lying faggot.

>>712862487
Let's be honest, would you really be surprised if it came out that THIS Alex Battaglia is doing the same thing?

>>712840759 (OP)
It's called a stutter.

>>712849897
I remember when I was playing Prey for the first time and I no matter if I set the game to high or low it'd run at around 40-50fps for literally no reason. Then I turned off triple buffered vysnc and the frames fucking shot up to over 100. Was surprised I played that game for so long at piss poor settings and framerate.

>>712841350
Why do you care? You already have your mail order asian bride and happa kid. There's no reason to care about your appearance any more John. Congratulations, you made it.

>>712857152
Are my only choices really
>Fat (old)
>Fat (young with bad facial hair)
>Fit (but gay and G*rm*n)
Being a gamer is fucking grim...

>>712841315
It's less visual and more control feel. Set your monitor to 30hz, then 60hz, then 120hz and move the mouse around each time. If you claim there is no difference, you're either just lying or have severe debilitating nerve damage to the hands and brain.

>inb4 "b-but muh retro game 25fps is fine"
Retro 3d games at 25 or 30fps feel like shit compared to their available 60fps hacks, but analogue refresh rates and nearly non existent input lag from a crt helps mitigate this.

>>712840759 (OP)
If it stutters then yes

>hairline dips from 1 to 3
AIEEEEEE SAVE ME FIN-SAMA!!!