Anonymous
6/17/2025, 1:03:07 AM No.712859914
Is Harry Mason a chud?
Replies:
Thread 712859914 - /v/ [Archived: 1060 hours ago]
Anonymous
6/17/2025, 1:33:07 AM No.712862327
I LOVE MY DADDY :)
Anonymous
6/17/2025, 1:34:58 AM No.712862456
Replies:
Anonymous
6/17/2025, 1:36:54 AM No.712862594
>>712859914 (OP)
ZOMG is that Leonard from the hit TV series "The Big Bang Theory"???!!!
ZOMG is that Leonard from the hit TV series "The Big Bang Theory"???!!!
Replies:
Anonymous
6/17/2025, 2:01:33 AM No.712864435
>>712862594
How much would the game change if Harry was replaced by Leonard? Don't get me wrong, he would still be Harry Mason but physically and psychologically he would think and act like Leonard.
How much would the game change if Harry was replaced by Leonard? Don't get me wrong, he would still be Harry Mason but physically and psychologically he would think and act like Leonard.
Anonymous
6/17/2025, 2:21:10 AM No.712865848
>>712859914 (OP)
This guy is how his daughter imagines him rather than a real person so yes
This guy is how his daughter imagines him rather than a real person so yes
Anonymous
6/17/2025, 2:24:21 AM No.712866056
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Sl7lkKWI_M&list=RD2Sl7lkKWI_M&start_radio=1
Replies:
Anonymous
6/17/2025, 2:56:36 AM No.712868325
>>712866056
Sneed in the night you think self-bump's allright
Deny it was you. Say "it's not me, I swear"
Something is telling you no post can change the page you are
Again
Sneed in the night you think self-bump's allright
Deny it was you. Say "it's not me, I swear"
Something is telling you no post can change the page you are
Again
Anonymous
6/17/2025, 3:03:20 AM No.712868794
Alright. Never mind. I asked chatgpt:
If Harry Mason from Silent Hill were replaced by Leonard Hofstadter from The Big Bang Theory, you'd get a very different kind of protagonist — one who’s more neurotic, hesitant, and scientifically analytical in the face of psychological horror. Here's how Leonard might behave:
Initial Reaction:
Leonard:
“Okay, okay, I lost my daughter in a creepy fog-covered town. Statistically, this could just be a weird weather anomaly... or I’m having a psychotic break. Either is equally terrifying.”
Where Harry was calm, determined, and focused on finding Cheryl, Leonard would probably freak out — talking to himself, overanalyzing everything, and trying to find cellphone reception or Google Maps.
Interaction with Silent Hill's Monsters:
Leonard:
“Those look like Freudian nightmares made flesh. Why is everything so… wet? Is this town’s theme just ‘moist and traumatic’?”
He’d likely try to understand the monsters from a psychological or metaphorical standpoint, referencing Jung, Freud, and maybe even Stephen King, while simultaneously panicking.
Using Weapons:
Harry grabs a pipe or handgun when needed. Leonard?
Leonard:
“I’m not touching that. It’s probably covered in tetanus. Wait — do these things even bleed?”
He’d be hesitant to use weapons, fumbling through a manual or trying to remember how to operate a handgun he saw on YouTube once.
Puzzle Solving:
Leonard would excel here. He’d treat Silent Hill’s puzzles like an escape room mixed with a quantum mechanics final.
Leonard:
“Alright, I’ve got a riddle involving Shakespeare, a piano with missing keys, and a bloodstained memo. This is just like that MIT puzzle hunt I did in 2003 — only with more demonic symbolism.”
If Harry Mason from Silent Hill were replaced by Leonard Hofstadter from The Big Bang Theory, you'd get a very different kind of protagonist — one who’s more neurotic, hesitant, and scientifically analytical in the face of psychological horror. Here's how Leonard might behave:
Initial Reaction:
Leonard:
“Okay, okay, I lost my daughter in a creepy fog-covered town. Statistically, this could just be a weird weather anomaly... or I’m having a psychotic break. Either is equally terrifying.”
Where Harry was calm, determined, and focused on finding Cheryl, Leonard would probably freak out — talking to himself, overanalyzing everything, and trying to find cellphone reception or Google Maps.
Interaction with Silent Hill's Monsters:
Leonard:
“Those look like Freudian nightmares made flesh. Why is everything so… wet? Is this town’s theme just ‘moist and traumatic’?”
He’d likely try to understand the monsters from a psychological or metaphorical standpoint, referencing Jung, Freud, and maybe even Stephen King, while simultaneously panicking.
Using Weapons:
Harry grabs a pipe or handgun when needed. Leonard?
Leonard:
“I’m not touching that. It’s probably covered in tetanus. Wait — do these things even bleed?”
He’d be hesitant to use weapons, fumbling through a manual or trying to remember how to operate a handgun he saw on YouTube once.
Puzzle Solving:
Leonard would excel here. He’d treat Silent Hill’s puzzles like an escape room mixed with a quantum mechanics final.
Leonard:
“Alright, I’ve got a riddle involving Shakespeare, a piano with missing keys, and a bloodstained memo. This is just like that MIT puzzle hunt I did in 2003 — only with more demonic symbolism.”
Anonymous
6/17/2025, 3:05:07 AM No.712868905
>>712859914 (OP)
God, that Harry looks like a complete faggot.
God, that Harry looks like a complete faggot.
Anonymous
6/17/2025, 3:10:30 AM No.712869267
Dealing with Fear:
Instead of facing fear stoically like Harry, Leonard would whimper, call out for Penny, and probably narrate his thoughts out loud:
>“I know fear responses are controlled by the amygdala, but knowing that doesn’t help when there's a skinless nurse charging at you with a scalpel!”
Finding Cheryl:
He’d still care deeply about finding Cheryl — maybe even more emotionally than Harry did — but would be much more vocal about his inner turmoil.
>“I’m not built for this. I’m a physicist! Not Liam Neeson!”
Encounters with Cult Members:
When confronted by Dahlia or other cultists, Leonard would try reasoning with them using science and logic — a terrible idea in Silent Hill.
>“You realize you’re basing your entire belief system on a severely flawed epistemology, right?”
Final Thoughts:
Leonard in Silent Hill would turn the experience into a surreal, panic-stricken, overly intellectual journey full of pop culture references, anxiety attacks, and accidental bravery. He’d survive — but probably only with therapy, a support group, and a strong Wi-Fi connection back home.
Cybil Bennett (the police officer)
Original dynamic: Harry and Cybil have a cautious but cooperative relationship.
Leonard's version:
Leonard would immediately defer to Cybil’s authority — and be both intimidated and kind of smitten.
>“Oh thank God, a cop. Please tell me you have a flashlight, a weapon, and ideally, a trauma counselor.”
>(whispers to himself) “Focus, Leonard, this is not the time to develop a thing for a hyper-competent woman with a gun.”
He’d offer to help solve puzzles but would be utterly useless in combat, constantly ducking behind Cybil and over-explaining everything.
Instead of facing fear stoically like Harry, Leonard would whimper, call out for Penny, and probably narrate his thoughts out loud:
>“I know fear responses are controlled by the amygdala, but knowing that doesn’t help when there's a skinless nurse charging at you with a scalpel!”
Finding Cheryl:
He’d still care deeply about finding Cheryl — maybe even more emotionally than Harry did — but would be much more vocal about his inner turmoil.
>“I’m not built for this. I’m a physicist! Not Liam Neeson!”
Encounters with Cult Members:
When confronted by Dahlia or other cultists, Leonard would try reasoning with them using science and logic — a terrible idea in Silent Hill.
>“You realize you’re basing your entire belief system on a severely flawed epistemology, right?”
Final Thoughts:
Leonard in Silent Hill would turn the experience into a surreal, panic-stricken, overly intellectual journey full of pop culture references, anxiety attacks, and accidental bravery. He’d survive — but probably only with therapy, a support group, and a strong Wi-Fi connection back home.
Cybil Bennett (the police officer)
Original dynamic: Harry and Cybil have a cautious but cooperative relationship.
Leonard's version:
Leonard would immediately defer to Cybil’s authority — and be both intimidated and kind of smitten.
>“Oh thank God, a cop. Please tell me you have a flashlight, a weapon, and ideally, a trauma counselor.”
>(whispers to himself) “Focus, Leonard, this is not the time to develop a thing for a hyper-competent woman with a gun.”
He’d offer to help solve puzzles but would be utterly useless in combat, constantly ducking behind Cybil and over-explaining everything.
Anonymous
6/17/2025, 3:11:11 AM No.712869316
Eileen shaving
Anonymous
6/17/2025, 3:12:07 AM No.712869381
>>712866056
>"This is going nowhere. I'm spelling it out, but you're not listening. Your troubled school days, how you're conflicted about marriage... your denial of death, the unfounded guilt, abnormal sexuality... Eighteen years of denial! A whole universe of fantasy in that thick skull of yours! A skull teaming with agents of repression. ...Blind children clutching photos in the dark. Pale freaks, goggle-eyed from watching home movies on loop. The term is 'complicated grief'. But it's simple, isn't it? A young girl... Her parents don't get along. She blames herself, as all children do. Then Daddy dies. What's a girl to do? Deny that Daddy died. Deny who Daddy was. What seven-year-old actually knows who their parents are anyway? So she obsesses and obsesses over this fantasy dad, propping up her make-believe with scraps... Scraps of a happy life that never was. Scraps of a father who never existed... Wake up! Your dad wasn't a hero... wasn't your knight in shining armor. He was a human being. You never knew him, and you never will. The dad walking around in your head isn't even a ghost. He never existed. A Frankenstein's monster, a child's fantasy... But you're alive. Your mother is alive. She's not the monster you make her out to be. You need to live your life.... Cheryl"
>"This is going nowhere. I'm spelling it out, but you're not listening. Your troubled school days, how you're conflicted about marriage... your denial of death, the unfounded guilt, abnormal sexuality... Eighteen years of denial! A whole universe of fantasy in that thick skull of yours! A skull teaming with agents of repression. ...Blind children clutching photos in the dark. Pale freaks, goggle-eyed from watching home movies on loop. The term is 'complicated grief'. But it's simple, isn't it? A young girl... Her parents don't get along. She blames herself, as all children do. Then Daddy dies. What's a girl to do? Deny that Daddy died. Deny who Daddy was. What seven-year-old actually knows who their parents are anyway? So she obsesses and obsesses over this fantasy dad, propping up her make-believe with scraps... Scraps of a happy life that never was. Scraps of a father who never existed... Wake up! Your dad wasn't a hero... wasn't your knight in shining armor. He was a human being. You never knew him, and you never will. The dad walking around in your head isn't even a ghost. He never existed. A Frankenstein's monster, a child's fantasy... But you're alive. Your mother is alive. She's not the monster you make her out to be. You need to live your life.... Cheryl"
Replies:
Anonymous
6/17/2025, 3:17:02 AM No.712869751
DAHLIA GILLESPIE (the cultist)
Original dynamic: Mysterious, cryptic antagonist.
Leonard's version:
Leonard would try to rationalize with her like a frustrated professor dealing with a student who believes in astrology.
>“Okay, listen — I respect your right to your beliefs, but summoning an ancient god through ritual sacrifice isn’t exactly peer-reviewed science. And honestly? The robes? Bit cliché.”
He’d be creeped out by her vagueness and might actually get more confused the more she talks.
DR. MICHAEL KAUFMANN
Original dynamic: Shady, morally compromised doctor.
Leonard's version:
Leonard would be excited to talk to another scientist at first — until he realizes Kaufmann is kind of a jerk.
>“You’re a doctor, right? You must have data, notes, anything? Wait — are you high? Are we high? Is this an extended hallucination?”
He’d eventually call Kaufmann out for being unethical and say something like, “No offense, but you’re the kind of guy that gives scientists a bad name. You’re basically Dr. Oz with a heroin problem.”
LISA GARLAND (the nurse)
Original dynamic: Tragic, emotionally vulnerable character.
Leonard's version:
Leonard would immediately fall into an awkward, overly compassionate mode, trying to comfort her while being clearly out of his depth.
>“You’re bleeding… or… melting? Do you need a bandage? I have some tissues. Okay, okay, don’t cry—oh god, I think she’s crying blood.”
He’d sympathize deeply with Lisa, but his scientific brain would be at war with his emotional side, trying to analyze her condition while panicking internally.
Original dynamic: Mysterious, cryptic antagonist.
Leonard's version:
Leonard would try to rationalize with her like a frustrated professor dealing with a student who believes in astrology.
>“Okay, listen — I respect your right to your beliefs, but summoning an ancient god through ritual sacrifice isn’t exactly peer-reviewed science. And honestly? The robes? Bit cliché.”
He’d be creeped out by her vagueness and might actually get more confused the more she talks.
DR. MICHAEL KAUFMANN
Original dynamic: Shady, morally compromised doctor.
Leonard's version:
Leonard would be excited to talk to another scientist at first — until he realizes Kaufmann is kind of a jerk.
>“You’re a doctor, right? You must have data, notes, anything? Wait — are you high? Are we high? Is this an extended hallucination?”
He’d eventually call Kaufmann out for being unethical and say something like, “No offense, but you’re the kind of guy that gives scientists a bad name. You’re basically Dr. Oz with a heroin problem.”
LISA GARLAND (the nurse)
Original dynamic: Tragic, emotionally vulnerable character.
Leonard's version:
Leonard would immediately fall into an awkward, overly compassionate mode, trying to comfort her while being clearly out of his depth.
>“You’re bleeding… or… melting? Do you need a bandage? I have some tissues. Okay, okay, don’t cry—oh god, I think she’s crying blood.”
He’d sympathize deeply with Lisa, but his scientific brain would be at war with his emotional side, trying to analyze her condition while panicking internally.
Anonymous
6/17/2025, 3:19:51 AM No.712869948
Horny Option, Always
Anonymous
6/17/2025, 3:20:07 AM No.712869975
ALESSA
Original dynamic: Mysterious, supernatural force.
Leonard's version:
Leonard would be scared of her, but also feel bad — like she’s a traumatized child who got mixed up in dark metaphysical nonsense.
>“Look, Alessa, I’m not a psychologist, but I think your inner child is literally manifesting monsters. Maybe we talk this out? With a therapist? And some industrial-strength night lights?”
He’d probably try to understand her pain in a compassionate way, possibly comparing her to Carrie or Eleven from Stranger Things.
Cheryl Mason
Original dynamic: Daughter / emotional anchor.
Leonard's version:
Leonard would genuinely love and care for Cheryl, but be way more panicky about her safety. He’d beat himself up constantly, muttering things like:
>“What kind of parent loses their daughter to a fog dimension? I have a PhD! I’ve published papers!”
When he finally finds her (or the Alessa-Cheryl fusion), expect a tearful, rambling reunion filled with half-comprehensible emotional outbursts and scientific metaphors about love, particles, and entanglement.
Original dynamic: Mysterious, supernatural force.
Leonard's version:
Leonard would be scared of her, but also feel bad — like she’s a traumatized child who got mixed up in dark metaphysical nonsense.
>“Look, Alessa, I’m not a psychologist, but I think your inner child is literally manifesting monsters. Maybe we talk this out? With a therapist? And some industrial-strength night lights?”
He’d probably try to understand her pain in a compassionate way, possibly comparing her to Carrie or Eleven from Stranger Things.
Cheryl Mason
Original dynamic: Daughter / emotional anchor.
Leonard's version:
Leonard would genuinely love and care for Cheryl, but be way more panicky about her safety. He’d beat himself up constantly, muttering things like:
>“What kind of parent loses their daughter to a fog dimension? I have a PhD! I’ve published papers!”
When he finally finds her (or the Alessa-Cheryl fusion), expect a tearful, rambling reunion filled with half-comprehensible emotional outbursts and scientific metaphors about love, particles, and entanglement.
Anonymous
6/17/2025, 3:22:44 AM No.712870141
>>712869381
I'm not even a ghost?
I'm not even a ghost?
Anonymous
6/17/2025, 3:31:30 AM No.712870719
Anonymous
6/17/2025, 3:33:40 AM No.712870860
>>712869381
>He never existed. A Frankenstein's monster
>Hey, I'm right here, asshole!
*Harry tries to hit him but his hand goes through Kaufmann's head as if he were a hologram.
>Well... this is awkward.
>He never existed. A Frankenstein's monster
>Hey, I'm right here, asshole!
*Harry tries to hit him but his hand goes through Kaufmann's head as if he were a hologram.
>Well... this is awkward.
Anonymous
6/17/2025, 3:35:03 AM No.712870960
SM harry mason looks like bill pullman in the casper flick
Anonymous
6/17/2025, 3:36:25 AM No.712871052
>>712870302
dramatic flair
dramatic flair