I’m gonna play it regardless because there’s no alternative and it already looks miles better than 2042.

>>713183725 (OP)
When does it release?

>>713183943
Likely this year if not then next year before GTA comes out

Arma 3 and Reforger.
Haven't touched a battlefield or call of duty since playing Arma 3.

They've not made a good bf game in over a decade. 9 years if you say bf1 was a good game.

>>713183725 (OP)
I refuse to buy it unless they go back to adding class weapon locks. I can make myself tolerate all the other annoying shit but without class based weapons its just not battlefield

and just like the last two games, my aimbot will go unnoticed the entire time.

>>713184358
Not into Milsim shit, otherwise I would have abandoned battlefield a long time ago. I play these games to go on rambo streaks and farm clueless boomers, not to larp as a soldier

>>713184358
Ditto, still want more BF though. I keep an eye on the franchise from a distance. Didn't care for BF1 or the WW2 one, nor the near future sci-fi one. But i'll buy this new one if people start playing it. And by people I mean friends and family.

>>713184861
I don't do Milsim, I fly helicopters mowing down larpers in PvP servers while doing tricks.
Spent a long time in the Bf4 scout heli, it translates well into Arma.
Plus the mods are sick. Get some mates together and you can play Starwars, Wh40k or whatever.

>>713185114
I like the idea of BF but idk if I'd get another one. Fighting over a doorway for an entire match is fun but not at the prices these games are selling for.

>>713184861
You're larping anyways though

The guns that will be in this game

>>713185775
Why do they need to state which guns are fictional? Do weenies really care about that nonsense?

>>713185775
well, already better than 2042 at least
I hope they add more and none of the stupid legally distinct fake guns that games are doing these days

>>713185873
Yes.

>>713186193
>Release date: October 29, 2013