I had a dream picrel was just released for the Switch 1. It had the same engine as engage and the same exploration gameplay as SoV.
A new "camp" system that allowed you to rest at castles you captured to resume the battle later - you could also explore them.
I was so happy and having the best time of my life.
Then I woke up.

>It had the same engine as engage
So Unity engine?
Not that I'm hating, it's one of the better looking Switch games. But yeah it wasn't some in-house engine.

>>713185956 (OP)
Sounds awful. I'd rather replay the old version.

The Switch introduced me to so much IP that I never tried, and FE is at the top of that list.
Anxiously awaiting something new for either console, would even pick up a 2 if needed.

>>713186472
You can expect FE news in the next big direct I would imagine. We haven't had news on anything new since Engage which is a couple years old. Only rumors floating around now.

At the very least I would expect Switch 2 patches for Engage and Three Houses, maybe even a Switch 2 Edition with extra content for Three Houses since it sold way better.

>>713185956 (OP)
It’s funny cause that’s how the rumors started. Someone saw a leak of Fire Emblem Engage years ago, specifically Sigurd's model and they said visions of the remake came to them in a dream. That's it. They misinterpreted an anniversary/celebration title of FE Engage as FE4 Remake because Sigurd is in it. 5 years now of this mysterious remake who's origins only exists in the dreams of a Twitter user who kept getting circular reporting "confirmation". Just keep repeating your insiders. Where did the source of the rumor come from? From the walls of Resetera https://www.resetera.com/threads/it-would-be-nice-if-nintendo-remastered-fire-emblem-awakening-do-you-think-itll-ever-happen.296597/ this is your FE4 remake source, repeated in a telephone game.
Not real in 2025, so half a decade of /v/ and Twitter repeating Neoxon's rumors that came to him in vivid dreams. Actual schizophrenia.

>>713187067
I wonder if the FE4 remake really is vaporware. Like if it ever existed to begin with.

>>713187067
>Actual schizophrenia.
I don't see the connection between what you described in your post and schizophrenia

i hope fe in switch 2 be better because fe in switch was one of the ugliest game on switch

>>713187896
Engage is a pretty good looking game by Switch standards. It's Three Houses that was rough around the edges visually, but I don't blame you for not knowing Engage was even a thing.

>>713188416
Why the fuck didn't Engage let me rotate the camera all the way around during maps Why would I ever want a very slight angle like that?

>>713188750
Good question. Idk, that was retarded especially when 3H gave you full camera control

What series besides Pokémon and Fire Emblem demand remakes and absolutely abhor anything new?

>>713189338
When the new shit you're getting is Engage, you're naturally going to want to return to better times

>>713189338
But 3H was new, and people won't shut up about it 6 years later.

>713185956

>>713189642
I can't believe this fucker is supposed to be some dependable prince too.
Engage was tailor made for trannies.

>>713189338
Not really. It's more like there is a split between oldfags and newfags.
FE11-12 were remakes and almost killed the series
Awakening and Fates were extremely successful and acclaimed by the general public
SoV was a remake and went completely unnoticed despite its excellent presentation
3H was an even bigger success
Engage was the only new game that had a mediocre reception

>>713190672
>FE11-12 were remakes and almost killed the series
It was 9 and 10 that almost killed the series, which caused IS to scramble for a remake of Marth's games to try and snag the Smash Bros crowd.
All four games failed, though.

>>713190847
11&12 did OK considering they were low budget games. The series could have limped along if it continued that way, as long as they didn't have another tellius-tier flop.

>>713191934
>The series could have limped along if it continued that way
Awakening was literally made as the final game. The horrible sales of Tellius and the underperformance of the remakes killed the series.
Awakening got lucky. (read as: IS got lucky, making the choice to let people do mid-game pairings)

>>713192093
the threat was something like "if awakening sells worse than fe12 the series is over"
which is reasonable considering it had a higher budget, including marketing

Mangs soloes engage with goldmary now!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCDM9VQx0Hw

>>713192504
>Solo.
>Decides with chat that its okay to visit hoiuses with other units
So much or a solo run,

>>713188416
I have a stupid bone to pick with Engage and its presentation. Why did they take away poke quotes from SoV and 3H?

>>713192504
Obsessed e-celebfag, get a fucking life

>>713192646
Damn...engage must be a jooke if anyone can do a solo run like that.

>>713189338
Pokémon Remakes USED to be good but are not so great anymore

>>713192504
I cannot believe he still scrapes the bottom of the barrel with Slopgage content

>>713193457
Why? Engage is good and he finally enjoys it like fates.
Cry about it but engage is having a comeback.

>>713193705
NTA but you're objectively wrong. Look outside your e-celeb bubble, retards who developed a parasocial relationship with a bald creep don't represent a sizeable portion of the FE market. Neither Engage nor 3H are getting any popularity boost during the release window of a new console unless they get an enhanced release like Zelda.

>>713190672
SoV’s fault was releasing at end of 3DS life.

Mans crashed his engage rom by going to the cae terrain.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCDM9VQx0Hw

This thread should’ve been archived by now

>>713186472
Back in my day Smash Melee is what got people into FE

>>713193705
Doesn’t change the fact that your franchise is completely washed

>>713185956 (OP)
>same exploration gameplay as SoV
FUCK OFF
That shit was bad, and it absolutely does not fit Genealogy.