>>713297389Information is one thins, and we had that, but content is something else, and that's what we have now. Think we were content consumers in those days? Not really. We didn't keep it essential, but we weren't buried under noise all the time.
The internet and smart phones have numbed people, younger people from an earlier age. Younger people aren't encouraged to be creative, and with AI even less so.
I hate to finally say it, but in my day we had to use our imagination, and we communicated like people in persona and did activities together.
>>713297059I'm old enough to remember the 70s, doesn't mean I much lived or experienced that era.
>>713299187Yeah, I remember as a kid reading magazines about dry spells, summer was usually the worse. It wasn't until around the later times of the PS1 that hits were being pumped out regularly. The PS2/Xbox age was great for this. The market wasn't saturated, so every game had to really count. From my perspective, the SNES was probably the best of all time, because the games were great, releases were a big deal, and shovelware was rare. Games around that time on all systems felt innovative and sometimes huge (Xcom, Tie Fighter, and Ultima 7 were amazing in their day) and nothing felt streamlined, simplified, and padded out to death.
>>713300468No. I'm a black(ish) and the joke about 80s blacks vs 90s blacks in Family Guy was actually pretty spot on. Look at movies from the two periods. *-0s blacks were the lively buddies, 90s blacks were gangsta stereotypes