Steam Reviews are weird.

You can take one look at the main character and see that she's an adult woman. Did this guy's "evidence analysis" not include looking at the character on the screen?

Or is this the new tactic of people who are trying to get pretty women removed from video games no matter what?

>>713295742 (OP)
Around 1 out of 100 people has schitzophrenia, so any product that's seen by several hundred people is going to have multiple schitzos seeing it. You shouldn't be surprised that some insane person said something insane on the internet, it's just statistics that they're going to crop up

>>713295742 (OP)
>You can take one look at the main character and see that she's an adult woman
Fantastic. Maybe the dev should make her age canon with a statement instead of asking us to dig through a FAQ that doesn't even answer the question.

You can take one look at the character and the way the scene is rendered and surmise that it's a shit game.

>>713295742 (OP)
internet has a fuck ton of crazy people. 4chan, steam, reddit, ffxiv, you name the place online and they're fucking there. when you have a platform like steam that allows anyone with a computer to participate then you open the floodgates.

>>713296276
nah that's just a speed distortion, the hallway is sprinting so it looks blurry just like when you look out the window of a car on the highway.

>steam wouldn't give this guy a refund even though he wrote a fucking essay in his refund request.

lmao. based. practically everyone gets a refund from that website.

>>713296003
>her age
the game's release date is right there on the steam page
june 4th
so she's about two and a half weeks old right now

>>713296625
Damn I have to wait 18 years to play with her...

>>713295742 (OP)
people that go like that on the net should be searched for cp

the duality of reviews

Anon, you have to understand.
Some people just want to complain.
Don't bother with those people, let them be.

>>713295742 (OP)
>take one look
I don't know, anon. That sounds like hard work. Are you sure you're not just a pedophile?

>>713295742 (OP)
Reading Steam reviews is a one way ticket to thinking everyone but you is retarded. I’ve regretting pretty much every time I’ve read more than one or two when looking at a new game. You’re bound to see a ton of people trying and failing to be funny by repeated a totally overused joke, broken if nonsensical English that’s barely related to the game, or my least favorite, the “I really wanted to like this game” or “I wish there was a neutral review option” people. I especially dislike the latter.
You either recommend it or you don’t. That’s the game here. It’s that simple. If you can’t decide, don’t leave a review. We don’t need to see your thoughts that badly.

what is it with br*ts and being absolutely obsessed with this shit?
so mentally ill

>>713295742 (OP)
>she didnt have the wrinkles of consent, the sags of consent, the fat of consent, the height of consent, the tattoos of consent, the shaved head of consent, the bones of consent, OR the hair dye of consent you filthy pedophile rapist chud!
its very simple anon, she didn't meet the basic checklist and thus is OBVIOUSLY a child.

It's not even a popular game, I'd expect this sort of retardation on mainstream stuff, but you really have to go out of your way to know about this one.

>>713295742 (OP)
>here in the UK
the jokes write themselves

I could probably find a game on steam in five minutes where this guy's accusations are actually true..why don't they go harass those games?

>>713295742 (OP)
is the game good?

>>713295742 (OP)
Dev posted the pedo review then responded to himself in an attempt to generate word of mouth. OP is the dev, and so am I.

>>713295742 (OP)
If someone sees a fictional character who isn't based on any real person and the first thing they think of is how old they are and the legality/morality of wanting to have sex with them then they're literally just pedophiles themselves and massively projecting.

>>713297845
In the UK loli cartoons are illegal and get jail time for shut-in nerds but paki rape gangs get intentionally ignored by the government and police for fear of being called racist if they arrest any of them for raping 11 year old girls. This attitude extends to the common man who will never shut up about fictional character ages and drawings but will immediately shrink back when pakijeet child rapists get brought up because it's dey culcha and you're not allowed to criticise them for it.

>>713300531
No, it's me!

>>713295742 (OP)
I actually looked up this review and it's made worse by the fact that 14 people found it helpful.

>>713300717
not exactly the behaviour in the review, but something I see a lot on the internet is:
>this character sure is HOT, I want to fap!
>WAIT! let me look up their age first
>what's that!? she's only 16? phew, good thing I didn't do anything yet! I'm so virtuous
>I will now proceed to shame and attack anyone who wants to fuck this character and call them disgusting for having sexual thoughts towards this literal child!1!! (even though I had sexual thoughts to begin with which is why I looked up the age so by my own metric I'm a monster too???)
these people are incomprehensible

Is this game fun? I like coomer puzzle/survival horror games.

>>713295742 (OP)
you're referring to a situation where a review or critique of a game misinterprets or misrepresents a character's age or appearance. This can happen for various reasons, including personal biases, misunderstandings, or a desire to critique certain themes in gaming, such as the portrayal of women.

You may focus on specific aspects of a character's design or narrative without considering the overall context or visual cues that clearly indicate the character's age. This can lead to conclusions that seem disconnected from the actual content of the game. Additionally, discussions around the representation of women in video games can be contentious. Some individuals advocate for more diverse and realistic portrayals, while others may feel that any depiction of women, regardless of context, is problematic. This can lead to polarized opinions and tactics that you are a worthless nigger. Ultimately, it's important to approach such discussions with an open mind and consider multiple perspectives, as the gaming community is diverse and opinions can vary widely.

>>713301147
probably some weird sort of coordinated effort
id flag the review as inappropriate. its basically slander

>>713297752
NO I HAVE to have an opinion!!

>>713295742 (OP)
they wanted a refund and are trying to manipulate them into giving it despite not being eligible anymore. they either thought their argument was untouchable because of the subject matter or they were doing it as revenge for not getting their way

jason schreier really did a number on these people holy shit

I got filtered by the first puzzle....

>>713301260
It was really fun, but short.