>>713365314>Less lethal is the use of tazers and rubber bullets, Less lethal is any employment of force that carries a serious possibility for lethality, but less so than alternatives. It's LESS lethal.
>Applying tourniquets correctly to a person bleeding out in the middle of a shoot out is a much harder thing to do than you think and even if applied correctly does not guarantee survival.There is no need to guarantee survival, that's why it's less lethal, not non-lethal. The employment of firearms is only justified to begin with, when lethal force would also be justified. The police, as servants of the people, intentionally employ the least amount of force.
>Cops in the UK do not just shoot people in the legs to "incapacitate" them lmao. If you're advocating for people to do so, then congrats you're just as bad as American cops trying to justify mag dumping Escalation of force is done according to the realities of the situation and is kept to a minimal level. Shots to the leg are taken when a perpetrator has to be incapacitated, but does not need the full escalation of force, i.e. magdump and when tazers etc. are either not working, out of range, or too dangerous to employ, e.g. a man with a knife advancing with clear violent intent.
>Being in an actual firefight is something that has to be experienced, you can't train your fight or flight response without actual experience Firefights are not what's being talked about here.
>*Killing a suspect. My guy I've treated gunshot wounds there's no such thing as a "less lethal" gunshot wounds. Fucking keyboard warriors with no experience talking about shit they've seen in movies is hilarious though so please continueIt's funny how you argue like this when leg shots being taken to incapacitate is completely normal in Europe, and is more common than the police using full lethal force. You're a fucking retard farthuffer.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Turku_attack