Thread 713473771

>>713473771 (OP)
If they bought a shitty game then they deserve to feel shame, just like you deserve to feel shame for even having GT screenshots in your possession.

>>713473914
>If they bought a shitty game then they deserve to feel shame

If they're complaining about things in a game that is generally regarded as crap then "you get what you paid for" is a fair response.

But if they're enjoying the game and you feel the need to object to things they say they personally liked about it then you've got mental issues.

>>713473914
>GT bad!
Are there really still remnants of people doing this shit? No one thinks GT is bad anymore and rightfully so.

>>713473914
GT is the last time Dragonball had soul.

>>713474104
>No one thinks GT is bad anymore and rightfully so.
>rightfully
You're going to have a hard time trying to argue that one when everything about GT was either a shameless rehash of something that came before or completely fucked up things that were already established all wrapped in a poorly animated bow.
Basically the only people who like it are spics who grew up with it and no one else.

>>713474515
Lets be honest here, he'll probably just say
>b-b-b-but Super sucked too!
because he can't defend GT.

>>713474104
It was good way better than the super slop anyone saying otherwise is coping

>>713475052
Called it

>>713475607
Everyone knows it's trash it's an imitation of what dragonball use to be. The art sucks, the animation sucks, the new forms suck, it's hot garbage

>>713477019
But enough about GT.
You know, the thing you're actually talking about and not the one you're trying to fruitlessly deflect to since you have no argument for GT.
Man, imagine being a fan of something you can't even say one good thing about.

>>713473771 (OP)
the remake was shit

>panpedo on my Vidya board
Leave
IMMEDIATELY

>>713474210
This

>>713477994
>Daipa was so shit that people think it's a remake of GT
Lol, good job Toriyama

>>713478712
That would make GT even worse anon.

>>713473771 (OP)
Good thread.

>>713477598
GT is superior to super in every way cope seethe dilate

>>713479179
What was even left for them to copy and paste from GT though? Tamagamis were shadow dragons. Gohma is another Pilaf. The adventure space for the draognballs was through the 3 demon realms. Hell they even made another SSJ4. The difference is that instead of crossdress Trunks we got scat Goku jokes. It's a big pile of shit.

>>713473771 (OP)
Pan is Shit

>>713479394
Then tell us what makes GT good.
Forget about Super, no one was talking about that, we're talking about GT.

>>713474210
Truth nuke
GT won
Superfags and daipafags LOST

>>713479563
>Tamagamis were shadow dragons. Gohma is another Pilaf.
Anon, the Tamagamis weren't remotely close to the shadow dragons in any way and Gohma being Pilaf wouldn't be something from GT as it is.
Anyway, it's not like GT had any original ideas to steal anyway.

>>713480042
So, what makes Goku good is a version of Goku that has never had a good fight and had to be bailed out of almost every single one he was in?

>>713473771 (OP)
agreed op, it's usually not nice to yuck another man's yum

>>713473771 (OP)
Op was not a faggot today.

>>713480042
>>713479762
This is all you need to know their forms are better, better art style more true to the original vibes the story has more elements to the original Dragonball what else is there to say?

>>713480042
Monke bros we are back.

>>713480372
>This is all you need to know their forms are better
Better than what? This isn't a comparison. You're supposed to be saying why you think it's good. Also
>better art style more true to the original vibes the story has more elements to the original Dragonball what else is there to say?
It shits on both of them being the start of the "shiny" era of dragonball. As for "more elements", what?
The rehashed adventure that they didn't stick to? The awful choice to turn Goku back into a kid? Because that's about the beginning and end of it.

>>713480759
I can't wait for this game. I just need a switch 2...

>>713480868
I just told you what was good it's not my fault you're so dumb you can't comprehend the english language

>I like the game
>what do you like about the game
>uh (marketing hook)
>but that's not an opinion you're just reciting the marketing
>huh?
this hobby is full of niggers now

>>713481296
>I just told you what was good
Except you didn't. You don't have any reasons for having your opinion and that's what makes an opinion an opinion.
You're just like some soulless spic golem who can't think for themselves.

>>713481609
I did you're a retarded brown subhuman end of story

>>713473771 (OP)
Where the fuck do you think you are?

>>713481919
Okay then if you did then point to where you said WHY the forms are better, WHY the artstyle is better and WHY the story has more elements from Dragonball

>>713474104
GT was a lot of aimlessness (moreso than filler in Z) and not a lot of interesting stuff. Also, graduation music when Goku went SS4 was gay.

>>713473771 (OP)
>criticizing and arguing with people when they tell you what they like about how 2+2=5
true you should never try to educate your brethren, just let them roll around in their own shit in their self-imposed pigsty of the mind

Imagine that you are a parasite that can practically possess living beings. Imagine that you manage to possess your loved one, being inside them, feeling and perceiving the same things around. That feeling of becoming one with each other, the greatest proof of love. That would be very funny haha

>>713474515
Literally describing Super right there, bud. Nothing but a shameless reshash, character assassinations and just constant bullshit done to the world. Not to mention popoff anime moments made to appeal to spics you so much despise. Toriyama's final bloodclot brain delusion as he was never able to grow with his work and devolved back in to trying to infantilize his work all culminating with Daima as his final work.

I'd sooner watch GT again than a single frame of Super or Daima.

>>713483906
If he's describing Super, explain how.
All you GTfags can do is shit on Super because even you know that GT has no redeemable qualities.

>>713484805
Cope seethe dilate

>>713484805
wow you enraged him to such a personal level that he went illiterate

Man DragonBall fans really can just post anywhere, I kneel... the mods fear the DragonBall chad...

>>713483395
>treating the appeal someone gets out of a game they played as a matter of mathematical equivalence that can be factually disproven

Pathetic behavior.

>>713473914
I'll be honest, they probably just wanted a Pan thread.

>>713485782
most /v/ posters are retards that don't quantify things as "i liked x because y" and rather quantify them as objective metrics "x is good because y" or even worse "x was the first to do y" and it's typically objectively wrong and they're just immensely ignorant, and then of course retards like you will come along "wow why are you being rude to li'l bro over his onions" and the statement wasn't a statement of opinion but rather a statement of fact and you and them are both just ignorant retards
>b-b-but
nah shut the fuck up dumb nigger

>>713486287
PATHETIC

BEHAVIOR

>>713473914
idea that you have to play or do the right things only is a sign of autism
nah i agree with you ppl should regret about it

>>713486569
>no let me continue spouting retardation as fact don't correct it
you're right that is pathetic behavior, we got a real boss baby watcher over here mad when his thread about how the 2nd movie he watched was very boss baby-like

>>713486287
>objective metrics
>good
"Good" and "bad" are subjective across the board. There's nothing that is objectively good or objectively bad.
When I say "this game has slowdown at this point," that's an objective statement.
If I say "this game sucks because it has said slowdown," it becomes subjective. There are literally people in this thread right now that will defend bugs and glitches as "sovl" and "kino."

>>713486720
good and bad are quantifiable metrics when they're in regards to competency of a product, it's retarded to say otherwise, you're just advocating for denigration of language

>>713473771 (OP)
Pan sexo

>>713486832
No, they really aren't. There isn't a single thing you can point to where 100% of the people would agree on it being good or bad. It's just zoomer faggots like you who are so scared of confrontation that you tell people "Don't say it sucks! Just say it isn't for you! Then you won't have to hear the heckin' r-word that's so problematic and toxic, sweaty!"
You're a fucking retard, objectively, since your IQ is about a quarter what it takes to be functional as a slug.

>>713486287
>>713486720
>>713486832
>>713487083
This argument should be studied in a lab

>>713473771 (OP)
why does grandma pan look so old only After 200? She's a saiyan.

>>713487083
no, you're just substituting like/dislike for good/bad, good inherently implies there's a quantifiability to it, you're a good person because you follow xyz of the bible, you're a bad person because you did xyz that's against our laws and moral stances
like/dislike and good/bad are not equal and should not be treated by such, this is why you get your feefees hurt when people rightfully call you retarded for saying x is good

>>713487305
So you're saying there isn't an argument to this day whether Hitler did anything wrong? He's most definitely good or evil by an objective scale that you made in your mom's basement?

>>713487468
good/bad is quantifiable, even if morality is relative, and you choose your metric you're quantifying it under, but we have an easily quantifiable stance of what videogame did x first, performance vs contemporaries, etc.
and yes hitler objectively did nothing wrong, he was an easy scapegoat by the US/USSR to cover up them stealing unit 731's research/the gulags

>>713487206
She is 1/4 saiyan. Gohan was already a half breed. This isn't Invincible where you stay pure blood.

>>713486720
good bad are subjective but you can make it objective lets say we talk about white(a color) and how it can achieve making ppl feel a certain feeling regardless of how you or me like it we can come and talk about how good the maker made that white to make ppl feel that feeling compared to other makers
any subjective can be objective with context yes not everyone may agree but its closest to objective

>>713486916
She's too fucking sexy

>>713489062
Hot

>>713489062
Guess I'm gay then for women

>>713473771 (OP)
based pan poster

>>713473771 (OP)
Yeah
>STOP LIKING WHAT I DONT LIKE
never went away.

>>713478392
>CHADS of /v/

>>713487083
>There isn't a single thing you can point to where 100% of the people would agree
Good thing that's not needed to establish good and bad. There are people that argue that murder and pedophilia are not bad, and those people are wrong and get killed.