>>713542818yeah nah from the start Arthur tells Strauss that usury is unseemly and ain't right, Arthur strongly prefers honest cons
Arthur uses violence because the people he's usually fighting and stealing from are also violent but Strauss preys on weak people in order to scam them later, and Arthur may be a crook, but he's a crook with a soul who is during this game questioning the fate of it (which the player gets to decide via the actions with him)
Theivery, thuggery, robbery, these are "honest" crimes and their victims are usually the upper-crust of society, the law or rival gangs
Loan sharking is dishonest and it relies on hornswoggling people who are more essentially background NPCs who didn't do nothing to anybody
I know we're talking moral relativism in the context of a violent criminal having a distaste for loan recovery in a video game about non-racist cowboys but for Arthur, I think it makes him feel like a "bad guy" which, by the end of the narrative, we discover he doesn't actually enjoy feeling like, which is why he chases Strauss off later
it's a last ditch attempt at getting right with God