Thread 713581590

Do video games really need this level of detail? Literally nose hairs? when you were a kid did you ask: one day I can see a woman's nose hairs?

Yes

>>713581590 (OP)
This type of thing exists for PC users that use video games as an excuse to brag about their rigs. Nobody who actually plays games gives a fuck.

>>713581590 (OP)
finally, my exact fetish is being appealed to

i only care for hair detail

>>713581590 (OP)
No. I want lifelike female feet.

Its just a flex. Imagine being at some video game developers event and being able to say you can see the peach fuzz on your characters. Imagine the rest of the developers there seething because they can barely texture their characters in the first place

>>713581590 (OP)
I think FFXIII-2 had nose hairs. Not on the nose thought but you could really see up their noses for a lot of characters.

>>713581790
>game gets a remake or port
>loses all details from the original game

>>713581790
Horizon tried this with Alloy's facial hair shining under sunlight and all it did was amplify how ugly she is. Nobody wants facial hair on women to be noticeable.

>chromatic aberration
this shit is so gay. it was bad enough when vidya switched from bloom to lens flare. not all visuals need to look like movies

>>713581891
Aloy gets more fugly as the series goes.

>>713581590 (OP)
Yes, how else will Nshitia sell its trash?

>>713581891
>>713582157
Didn't they also go as far as to showing she had stained underwear? Someone on the staff really had it out for her.

>>713582157
Who's on the right?

>>713582268
That's fucking hot and I need screenshots.

>>713582257
I actually prefer the right unless that's what this image is trying to show

>>713581590 (OP)
Nose hairs are hot, faggot.

>>713582428
sure you do

>>713582428
incel

>>713581590 (OP)
>one day I can see a woman's nose hairs?
esl moment

>>713581590 (OP)
I thought /v/irgins wanted all games to be as realistic and detailed as possible because graphics are the most important thing about games.

>>713581590 (OP)
useless detail

>>713582516
>>713582595
Left has motion blur with battlefield lens flare and is hurting my eyes from how bright it is. Right is clear with no AA and simpler look. It looks like Vampire the Masquerade. What happened to this board?

>>713583297
>Left has motion blur

>>713581891
>>713582268
makes it seem like they were going for the smelly unkempt amazon thing. shame they forgot to make her hot.

>>713582595
>Gotham Knights
Game was so poorly made they locked it to 30fps on consoles

>>713581590 (OP)
I hate hyper realistic graphics so much

>>713581590 (OP)
This is someone's fetish

They don't exactly need it, but I appreciate it.

>>713583297
You may actually be blind. Astigmatism is common in the left eye you know? I'm only saying this because, sure, maybe motion blur, from the rain or something, but there is absolutely no fucking lens flare in that image.

>>713585419
Lights don't look like that in real life unless you have that eye problem

>>713585736
That's not lens flare thats bloom you dipshit.

>>713585736
This is lens flare, it is the effect of a singular powerful light source refracting within the lens causing a line of flares, hence the fucking term.

>>713582157
Gorillaloy doesn't even look like a man

>>713585798
>>713585936
Whatever the fuck it's called it's bad and the picture on the right looks better. If it was made in 1994 you guys would say it had soul.

>>713586306
> If it was made in 1994 you guys would say it had soul.
Yeah dark soul (s), because it's all blue and desaturated.

>games that were shit on by faggots in the past now trying to be used as examples of greatness

utterly pathetic how this newfag generation has become. go watch your cutscene simulators, you utterly pathetic losers

>>713581590 (OP)
No. It's just easier to do this kind of "polygon count go up" benchmarking to flex for your game than actually innovate

>>713581590 (OP)
cute upturned pig-nose

>>713582157
left is better because when i cum on her face the cum gets stuck in the hair and stays on her face longer.
on the right it just slides right off.

>>713582595
both of those are capeshit games

>>713581590 (OP)
Of course! If video games weren't 1:1 photorealitic, then they would need to hire art directors.

>>713581891
its not faical hair its peach fuzz they grow all over your body and usually they are really pretty and improve skin feel.
under sunlight you will literally look like you are glowing but when its overgrown it can look nasty
idek if there ways to fake it with cosmetics

>>713581901
Lens flare doesn't even make sense unless you're in first person wearing a helmet. You don't get lens flare in just your eyes. It's immersion breaking, i hate it so much.

>>713582738
There is no such thing as a most or least important aspect of a video game. Every part of it is equally important.

>>713581901
>need to look like movies
chromatic aberration is literally a defect of camera lenses movie guys tend to fix it unless they were specifically told to make their movies ugl-err i mean more artistic

>>713581590 (OP)
They don't need it but it's cool. They only show up when the camera is really close, so they don't cost lots of performance.
It's usually not hard to add to the character because a system is already in place. Probably just a texture mask with material settings to extrude little hairs from the white areas

>>713589787
That shit get a pass irl because you can't eve notice it, unless the woamn is unkempt or subhuman

>>713582738
Nobody ever say that, and certainly nobody wants YOU specific woke brand of "realism"

>>713581590 (OP)
The realism fad needs to die, and scanfaces banned

>>713593250
>get a pass irl because you can't eve notice it
<Peopple can notice. You can't because no woman will let you get close enough or touch her.

>>713581590 (OP)
When you were a kid, you asked
>I WANT MORE REALISTIC GRAPHHHIXXX!!!
You get what you asked for, you absolute faggot. You made this bed for yourself.

>>713581590 (OP)
but number has to go up

>>713587739
you seek the pigged up cuties anon?

Ugly peach fuzz would not bang

>>713589787
Peach fuzz can't overgrow unless you have Hypertrichosis irl or the dev fucked it up like Aloy in game

>>713593250
>>713593427
you dont even need a woman to see and feel peach fuzz just look at yourself in the mirror

>>713581590 (OP)
They need to show that women have nose hair as well or else people will suffer from the same (actually happened in real life) situation where they get freaked out and disgusted because women have pubic hair when porn and stuff often depict women without it

>>713581590 (OP)
Sorry to hear you've never been up close to a woman bro

>>713581590 (OP)
Impressive, honestly

>>713581590 (OP)
it is worth it only if I get to put hooks into the nose and make them do a piggy face with them

>>713594794
what kind of suck fuck licks a nose? fucking lapping at it

I really think making her look like nikacado was a bad move

>>713593474
Nope. It was "better graphics" because graphics looked like lego.
And it was a given that nobody would have ever drwn a less than perfect looking hot babe.
Realismshit is a corpo trend made for normgroids

>>713593664
You dont' see that shit irl, unless you get out of your way to make them visible. And just because they exist doesn't mean that you have to put in games.
Just draw a flawless face, faggot

>>713594093
So what? Are you still talking to a strawman?

Don't put that shit in games. Make only 12/10 perfect babes, no scanfaces

>>713582335
It's me

>>713581590 (OP)
Yes, women in videogames need every single ounce of their body ravaged since they owe us sex

>>713596550
Virtual toys only exist for the onjoyment of the intended audience, be them shaped like women or not.

Only woketards use the "real women" non-argument.

>>713581590 (OP)
unrealistic slop

real woman looks like this in close-up

>>713581590 (OP)
No