>>713710085 >Would you like for Mario's status quo to be changed?
Yeah, probably. I don't think anybody would be complaining if the games suddenly started calling Daisy "Luigi's girlfriend" or something, for example.
>>713710510
But when you take into account Odyssey's ending, do you think that the "Mario saves Peach" plot should be retired, or given one final sendoff?
>>713709630 (OP) >>713713538 >>713713710
she is de-aged Pauline >baggy/torn dress >baggy pants >no shoes (since they don't fit her and you can't wear "baggy shoes")
>>713714202
No, I keep saying that Mario could have conceived with Pauline when he was at least 18, so Donkey Kong Bananza could take place when he is at least 31.
>>713715017
I think the movies are just retellings of past events in the Mario canon, at least past events in a timeline where Mario doesn't have a prior relationship with Pauline.
>>713710085
I wouldn't. It has a perfect status quo. I don't want to see this travesty happen.
Why are people so obsessed with taking timeless characters and making them... not timeless anymore? An attempt to claim them for your era? Like "heh newfags will never know the original Mario era from 1985-2025 before he changed his role and character. Yep it truly was a golden age before the Mario babysitting era games"
