>tfw you don't own anything and are happy

fuck video games

>>713816216 (OP)
/v/ermin unironically think like this btw

>mfw I knew nothing about this guy and spent a whole ass day in this rabbit hole

>>713816216 (OP)
>You are entitled to servers forever even after you had years with the game despite knowing it's online only and a player count under double digits
Surely you must admit there is at least a line

>>713816762
i know you're a zoomer but you used to be able to host your own games

>>713816216 (OP)
How could he not have been beaten up at this point?

>>713817091
He barely leaves his room and niggers on /v/ or reddit can barely stand

>>713816594
Explain what happened my dude

>>713817091
i'm sure he was in school, i mean the guy seems like an insufferable douche

>>713817186
my brain is fried from watchin so much of this. he had a bad take and now he's gettin shat on. he seems to not take accountability for anything and just double downs.

>>713816594
>Mr. Evrart is helping me find my teddy bear

>>713816762
It's not about MMOs, from what I understand. It's about games that can be played alone and don't require multiplayer to be enjoyed.
That being said, it does worry me slightly that if this goes through and affects video games, there might be an incentive to not make any sort of solo functionality for online games.
There might be a case where a developer wants to make an online game with a purely solo mode, but they'll instead opt to leave the solo mode out in order to avoid the hassle of making it work when the servers shut down.
If this does however include MMOs in the sense that MMO developers will have to let players operate the servers after official support ceases, then the idea is doomed.
If I was an MMO developer, I wouldn't want some slavs/chinks/jeets using my game and operating paywalled servers, making a profit off my work. Of course the idea is that the community would just have fun with the game without any malicious intent, but that obviously won't always be the case.

>>713816762
you are ignorant of what the demands are. the guy doesn't expect companies to host servers, he just wants it to be possible for the community to attempt self hosting.
>you think you are entitled for a developer to lay the groundwork for a dedicated server transition
if you want to be argumentative that's the line.

>>713817504
>he had a bad take
If that all you got from the supposed rabbit hole, you were not paying attention

>>713818314
You sound like a redditor, maybe you should go back.

>>713816216 (OP)
WOAH DUDE IS THIS A FUCKING TWITTER E-CELEB DRAMA THREAD???? WOAH I MEAN WOAH DUDE HAHA MAYBE YOU SHOULD LIKE FUCKING GO BACK THERE YOU FUCKING RANCID JEET NIGGER NO ONE FUCKING CARES KILL ALL VIDEO GAMES FOR ALL I FUCKING CARE GO THE FUCK BACK WHERE YOU CAME FROM YOU TOURIST ZOOMERS

>>713816762
Hi Thor. I should inform you that is not what Stop Killing Games is about. All that was being asked was if a game has a single player component but has always online DRM, that a patch has to be made to allow the single player component to be playable if the DRM servers ever have to be taken down permanently. Also while this isn't officially in the Stop Killing Games petition since they need to start somewhere, people also want always online multiplayer games to be required to make dedicated servers accessible if the game is being shut down. Neither of those are unreasonable. Actually talk to Ross, he's not an asshole, you are.

>>713818441
The future of the games industry is not twitter drama. If video games became outlawed for some reason and people on twitter talked about it, would that become "twitter drama"?

>>713818314
Hi, Thor!

Wasn't City of Heroes able to do the thing he said was nigh impossible/unreasonable? Like that whole crusade /v/ and some parts of the internet had against that dude who was holding the game code hostage or something and then everyone got a piece of it and it all worked out?

>>713818362
>>713818585
dumb niggers, there's more to him than "just a bad take"

>>713816762
Where do you commie faggots keep coming from?

>>713817186
he completely mischaracterized the points of the stop killing games movement and when called out by the founder he refuses to talk to him

>>713818749
Again, just because you say nigger doesn't mean you should be here.
Go back.

>>713816762
Leftroons be like. "I must poison the water basin and kill everyone I know because a nazi chud could drink water from it"

>>713816216 (OP)
>be a roach
>get called out on being a roach
>double down on your roaching in a tweet
>delete tweet when literally everyone tears clowns on how retarded it is
>now that people scrutinize you tons more roaching comes out
It's funny how quickly these things compound.

I pay money to play game, you not let grug play game no more me angry not agreed upon :(