>>713863334 (OP)
The people accusing Toby Fox of plagiarism aren’t making any serious point. They’re not interested in actual analysis. They’re just bitter nobodies reacting to someone who made something they couldn’t. He put out a weird little game full of sincerity and strangeness, and instead of ignoring it like normal people, they obsess over it and try to drag it down.
This is classic slave morality, the kind Nietzsche spelled out clearly. They don’t create anything of value themselves. They don’t have the strength to act or affirm, so they moralize and condemn. Instead of aspiring, they spite. Toby succeeds, and their only move is to call him a fraud or a thief, hoping it’ll even the playing field.
They cant outdo him creatively (obviously), so they retreat into resentment. They reframe his success as some kind of wrongdoing. The same way the weak, in Nietzsche’s terms, called the strong “evil” just to feel righteous in their weakness. That’s the whole game here, reaction disguised as principle.
Toby didn’t steal. He synthesized. He referenced, built, mutated. That’s what actual art looks like. The people crying “plagiarism” wouldn’t recognize originality if it slapped them in the face, because they’ve never touched it themselves. They’re scavengers playing moral police because that’s the only power they know.
