they can be, but generally no
No just toys and products
it's entertainment that (at best) incorporates forms of art
so no
>>713889769 (OP)No. They're electronic toys for (man)children, desperately seeking to be taken seriously. They will never, and I mean NEVER be art
>>713890758BASED FUCKIN MEGA BASED FUCK YEAHHHH FUCK THE FUCKING KEKMERS KEKMERS SUCK MY COCKKK TOTAL GAMER DEATH
>>713890940chadtholics > protestcucks
>>713889769 (OP)Aesthetically beautiful game, too bad the gameplay got somewhat repetitive just like all souls game
>>713894556Blasphemous 2 had better gameplay but everything else was inferior to 1.
>>713889769 (OP)i dont know but i saw that blasphemous was like 2 € on the steam sale
>>713894654this anon speaks the truth