Thread 713896750 - /v/ [Archived: 690 hours ago]

Anonymous
6/28/2025, 5:01:08 PM No.713896750
file
file
md5: 74a4337ab17ea25f6b08e5b22e3ecb08🔍
Still not buying them until there is a screenless, traditional variant
Replies: >>713898043 >>713898283 >>713898343 >>713899040
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 5:02:03 PM No.713896819
Just buy one with a broken screen on eBay.
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 5:16:17 PM No.713897760
how the hell is the Switch 1 still over 300 dollars lmao what a joke of a company
Replies: >>713897836
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 5:17:34 PM No.713897836
>>713897760
Couldn't save 300 dollars in 8 years wow
Replies: >>713898129
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 5:20:42 PM No.713898043
>>713896750 (OP)
If nintendo was smart they would do this. They could sell them for like $150. They won't though even though it was massively increase the customer base.
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 5:22:02 PM No.713898129
>>713897836
the post flew over your head
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 5:24:15 PM No.713898283
>>713896750 (OP)
>2012 tier hardware for $349 in 2025
And people in Japan still consistently bite. I don't get it.
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 5:25:05 PM No.713898343
>>713896750 (OP)
Op, at that point nintendo may as well make an actual console powered by nvidia's strongest ARM hardware that's available.
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 5:34:46 PM No.713899040
Screenshot 2025-06-28 091704
Screenshot 2025-06-28 091704
md5: 76d1882989cb1c38c19ab8b6087d2dc3🔍
>>713896750 (OP)
Based. At this point, if Nintendo wants to release an inferior handheld with an inferior screen that's barely better than a 20 year old PSP, I'd rather just hook their little console up to my nice bigscreen TV.
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 5:38:05 PM No.713899259
1000000531
1000000531
md5: d5e6aac644276bd82722212cc98d3c19🔍
Anon you do realize that the hardware wouldn't be improved if they just made a Switch that couldn't be used portably, right? It's not like it'd be some pro gamer edition that has PS5 Pro specs or some shit, it'd just be a screenless switch fused into the dock.
Replies: >>713899327
Anonymous
6/28/2025, 5:39:02 PM No.713899327
>>713899259
And that's fine.