>>713955260
>Octopi are on a "less evolved" branch of the evolutionary tree than fish
quoted directly from your own post
and you still haven't addressed the core point of my post, that octopus studies universally come to the conclusion that they are highly intelligent compared to their closest relatives
but that does not mean that they are highly intelligent compared to mammals, they're not, they're just hyperspecialized in solving certain types of problems
But to again take your own post, you mentioned octopus memory, in a discussion that involves comparing them to elephants, and well, this is just something elephants are drastically superior at, that's not even up for discussion
sure you can argue that elephants live longer and that they teach each other and what not, but all that is irrelevant to the fact that elephants can memorize ridiculously large areas in exceedingly specific detail and in terms of geographic memory exceed humans handily
and that's something that has to be noted
In absolutely 0 aspects of tested intelligence has an octopus ever exceeded a human, or even approached a human, not even in the aspects in which they have hyperspecialized
and that's something which is absolutely worth noting because, unfortunately for the octopus, but even an animal as seemingly unintelligent as the pigeon has at least one mental task in which it exceeds humans
I know you want to imagine octopi as being a crazy intelligent creature overall, but that's simply not what they are, they're the most intelligent molluscs and rank very high in specific tasks, but overall intelligence, they're not anywhere close to the upper echelons of mammalian or avian intelligence, because there's simply no fitness to be gained from them increasing their intelligence