What monitor are you gaming on /v/?
You're not using a tel*vision are you?

32in 4k OLED + 5090
VRR off because flicker is AIDS garbage and i don't feel any difference in terms on latency

>>713972503
>4k

Still on 1080p 144hz. 4k still seems like a meme performance-wise and I don't see the point in 1440p if it makes 1080p content like movies look bad.

>>713971854 (OP)
3 cheap 1440p LED panels.
They're not the best, but they're good enough.

name a monitor better than a Samsung S95F for Switch 2

>>713972632
>1080p 144hz
Same. i can't even render at higher resolution in some games because they need extremely powerful cards (i even have a RTX 4070) but if i want to play older games i simply use DLDSR for Bette image quality

>>713971854 (OP)
a 1440p 165hz monitor from lg

MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED
Decent HDR
360hz
No text fringing
I couldn't ask for more

>>713972789
>Switch 2
this might be more your speed, little buddy

>>713971854 (OP)
Dell G2724D
Pretty nice 1440p 165 hz monitor

i got an alienware monitor 27 inches, 1440p 280hz. my gpu is rtx 5060ti. idk i just wanted to upgrade my rtx 2080 and my cheap dell monitor i was using

>>713973005
>RTX 4070
You can play at 1440, especially with DLSS. And 1440 DLSS Quality looks better than native 1080.

>>713971854 (OP)
an LG C5 that blows the fuck out of your blurry bleeding ass LCD monitor.

I'm currently using a Dell SDG2417DG, now the monitor got some kind of pixel defect in and out every second. Like for example, the text get cut of in certain angle. I'm eyeeing for Oled, any good models?

>>713974236
Not that anon, DLSS has gotten better but it isn't pure magic. I have a 4070S and I still struggle with Cyberpunk the moment I enable raytracing, even with performance mods (and framegen makes the game look like dogshit)

>>713974236
Not recent games. If you take Expedition 33 i don't even reach 60fps at epic 1080p

I got the cheapest 55 inch tv on the market

>>713974640
If you're gonna struggle at 1440 DLSS Quality with raytracing, you'll also struggle with 1080 native with raytracing because they run about the same. So just don't enable raytracing.

>>713971854 (OP)
Yes I'm using a television
You will NEVER be as comfy as me, all scrunched up in front of a desk

>>713974787
seems a bit posery

>>713973491
I accept your concession

>>713974842
You insist upon yourself.

monitors are deprecated

NEC commercial signage. Only way to get a sensible monitor these days, because all monitors are far too small, and all TVs are filled with bloat shitware and awful subpixel arrangements.

why does 24" 1440p died?

anybody knows what's the best QHD OLED monitor with a decent price?

>>713971854 (OP)
27" AOC, Vertical (Main for PC)
27" ASUS, Horizontal (Main for Consoles, Secondary for PC)
19" Acer, Horizontal (Secondary for PC)

they're all IPS since I can't stand VA ghosting and OLED is too expensive

>>713974929
check dell AW2725D

AW3225QF. It meets all of my needs and is delicious oled.

>>713974907
your mouse is wired and has disgusting holes
you clearly have zero taste

Anybody got any experience with the new Dell Oled, AW2725D?

There is no point using anything bigger than 24" for desktop PC gaming.

I've tried 27" 1440p multiple times. I'm even on one RIGHT NOW because I wanted to try it out again. Otherwise it just dusts inside a box. And surprise surprise it just makes everything I do slower. In games and on desktop.

I open 4chan and more than half the page is just empty white background. Same with Google. On Twitch all the streams look worse than usual because my desktop and text is so sharp, 720p streams might aswell be unwatchable. The screen is so big that the video is huge compared to the chat, even without theater mode. More adventuring with your eyes and mouse, harder to make fast clicks.

And in games I need 50% more power (not a problem for me, but still) and I register less information because my vision can cover less of the screen. Objects seem faster because they are bigger. HUD in some games just feels like it's assaulting my face.

Just think how far we sit from a TV. Think of the recommended viewing distances. Even when compared to a movie theater the size of the monitor on your desk is fucking huge because, well, it's on your desk.

>>713974928
Did it ever live in the first place?

>>713974716
That works for games like cyberpunk because they're still somewhat decent looking without the raytracing.
But then you have stuff like indiana jones where it's either you enable raytracing or shadows look like actual dogshit, worse than some 10 year old games even.

I jumped from 1080p to 1440p to 4k in the last year. Just wanted to tell you guys not to bother with 1440p. Either stay on your 1080p for now or get a 4k monitor. 1440p's visual upgrade over 1080p is so small you'll get used to it within days.
>inb4 too expensive
This used to be a valid complaint back when high refresh rate higher resolutions monitors were super expensive, like back when 1440p 144hz IPS monitors cost north of 500 bucks. But now you can get 4K 160hz IPS monitors starting from 300 bucks. Literally just don't buy cigarettes or junk food for a while and you'll get the money.

>>713971854 (OP)
i can't remember, my monitor is like 10 years old

144hz though so it's good

>>713975456
4k rocks.

>>713975562
Just making the image bigger so that the resolutions look even worse. Why do people do this and pretend that it's a good thing? Is the need to defend your purchase and bigger number really that much of a religion to you?

>>713975760
Stay seething at my tactical advantage scrub.

>>713975760
>Just making the image bigger so that the resolutions look even worse.
Do you think that's what a resolution increase is? Just taking the same image and stretching it?

>>713975456
Fuck do you mean it's a small upgrade
A 4K monitor increases requirements, which makes your point of 4k panels being cheap irrelevant, and needs more upscaling nonsense. All you get from it is nicer looking fonts. The better upgrade is panel technology and refresh rate, and at 27'' 1440p is just as fine as it needs to be.
Another cool thing about 1440p: it's exactly 480p. Old shit looks gorgeous because integer scaling is exactly 3 times that.

>>713975886
I just woke up so I am writing stupid. What I was trying to say was texture resolution.

>>713975854
Why don't pros just play like this? People who play Age of Empires 2 on pro level just have tiny monitors. It's almost like there is no tactical advantage to be gained from the thing you're doing.

>>713976002
Sounds like a (You) issue to me.

>>713971854 (OP)
MSI MAG 274URFW because it comes in white. Which matches my white tower case and white keyboard and white mouse.

>>713971854 (OP)
went from a cheap ass va 1080p va monitor to a budget 1440p ips monitor and let me tell you this thing fucking sucks if you play with a variable refresh rate. Thinking of dipping my toes into OLED shit.

>>713976175
VRR doesn't help if the panel is switch 2 tier slow.

>>713976091
I'm not a pro. It's Your issue trying to convince me and the rest of the world, that the best players in every game ever are using wrong sized monitors and handicapping their own performance.

>>713971854 (OP)
I just emulate a virtual screen and moonlight too my phone for all my gaming needs. Imagine actually having a dedicated screen and input for your PC, it's 2025.

It confuses me that people willingly cheap out on their display while spending loadsemone on other parts of their gaming setup when ultimately the screen is what you look at and has the biggest impact on visual quality.

>>713976293
I never said anything of the sort - that is your projecting anon.

LG 27" 1440p IPS 165hz
Got it for 200 buck

>>713976446
Yes you did just tell me that it is a me problem even though it's clearly not a me problem, but a widely accepted take on desktop screen resolution and dimensions.

>microLED
>something around 21:9 "6k" resolution
>Full rec 2100 coverage
>at least 400 nits full screen white brightness
I can dream can't I?

>>713976617
>no u!
Compelling anon.

>tfw there will never be a 24" oled 1440p panel on the market

>>713976720
24" is too small desu. 27" is the minimum imo but ideally everyone should be using 32".

Dell U2515H
25 inch, 1440p, 60hz IPS

It just works.

>>713976703
So you are just telling people that they're wrong and not even going to attempt to justify your memes? Like look at the picture you just posted. The HUD is so tiny you need to move your head/eyes every time you take a look at something. Same with the isometric games you just posted. Good luck trying to identify and click on the things you're supposed to while moving your mouse to the other side of the world.

>>713976908
oh noes! anyway.....

>>713971854 (OP)
One of my side monitors died, so now I need a new one. It seems impossible to find a monitor that's 4K, has 100% accurate colors, good blacks, is not OLED, doesn't have screenglow from IPS, doesn't cost a fortune, and doesn't have issues with it.

Every single monitor I find has some sort of issue. Why isn't there just a perfect 4K productivity monitor with fully accurate colors and blacks?

>>713976175
IPS is the only thing that can make VRR work well because there's no flickering. Switch to VA or OLED and there will be flickering if the framerates fluctuate enough.

>>713977019
Yes. Keep going and show everyone how stupid average 4K user is.

The human eye can't see more than 1080p anyway.
Nintendo knows this, whuch is why the switch 2 only goes that far.
Sony and MS knows this which is why ps5 and SeX games run mostly at that.
Smart PC gamers know that which is why the majority play at that resolution and buy monitors at that resolution.

>>713977283
It's about pixels per inch. What a lazy false flag. Current gen console games also push above 1080 like all the time.

>>713977419
see >>713977234

Samsung Odyssey OLED G85SB
It's 3440x1440 175hz.

>>713972789
>S95F
An LG G5 what do i win

>>713977528
I already called out your shitty false flag. Now stop it.

>>713971854 (OP)
I use a Samsung Odyssey G70B, a fucking "smart" monitor. All I wanted was a 4K 144Hz monitor, and this is just that.
Problem is the "smart" functionality basically means it's a TV, it came with a remote and everything. And I have an actual Samsung smart TV (a Q90A) in the same room.
Now my monitor and TV share the same IR signals, so the TV remote also affects the monitor. Try to turn on the TV? The monitor gets turned off.
The solution was to cover the monitor IR sensor with black tape. But still, never fucking again.

>>713971854 (OP)
>You're not using a tel*vision are you?
Literally changed my LG C3 for a QD-OLED 32" monitor and holy shit, 42" is so fucking good I fucking regret making the change.

>>713971854 (OP)
A samsung qled 1440p 244hz screen, i don't see myself moving to a different screen until it breaks.
>>713975456
I strongly disagree. 4k is a meme for anyone who but people with fuck you money who can buy xx90 cards like its nothing. 1440p is also q significant upgrade over 1080.

>>713977617
that's not even a monitor

>>713971854 (OP)
Odyssey Ark. 55" 4k MiniLED.

BenQ RD240Q
I didn't really buy it as a gaming monitor but I still do all my gaming on it
>>713974928
it was never that popular but there are actually some 24" 1440p >75hz monitors nowadays
a few cheaper 100hz panels, essentially office monitors that were probably overclocked a bunch, and actual 144+hz ones like the Q24G2A

>>713977749
>I strongly disagree. 4k is a meme for anyone who but people with fuck you money who can buy xx90 cards like its nothing.
You don't need xx90 cards to use a 4k display. You're not just playing games that are releasing in the future, you're playing games that released in the last few decades. Something like an RTX4070 can run games from the 2010s at 4k no problem.

>>713971854 (OP)
A 27" 1440p 165Hz Dell paired with a 24" 1080p 60Hz Dell

>>713977873
nooooooooooo you must run the latest and greatest!!!

>>713977873
Ok but what if I played them 15 years ago?

>>713977234
NTA, but even with old low resolution textures, there's an advantage with 4k. More detail is visible onscreen, and the edges are smoother without shimmer.

>>713978369
>and the edges are smoother without shimmer.
Just suck the soul right out why don't we?

>>713978451
So are we in agreement that "soul" is shittiness?

>>713978369
I don't recall seeing shimmering in HL2. It supports MSAA. The textures just look more pixelated when seen up close.

>>713971854 (OP)
I got some cheap Dell 60hz and 1080p

>>713978646
>HL2
1* -.-

>>713978646
>It supports MSAA.
You mean rendering at higher resolutions, which is a meme that you're against.

>>713978735
Pixels. Per. Inch.

MSAA doesn't make the image bigger. MSAA doesn't stretch the textures. MSAA doesn't hide half of the game outside your focus.

>>713976002
The reason behind playing zoomed in is to be able to click shit.

>>713971854 (OP)
I have endless fuck-you money and I have a few 4k OLEDs around the house. OLED is really cool and all other displays seem gray and dull in comparison now, but you have to adapt your environment to make them look good. So no excessive light in the room or else the screen turns magenta, nothing too shiny in front of the screen or else it reflects really obviously off the glossy surface, no leaving the display on when you're not using it, and so on.
This is why my main laptop is still IPS, when you carry your screen around for work and travel you can't control your environment this so so it's better to have a screen that just werks in bright rooms and regardless of FPS.

As for vidya, now every sub-4k resolution seems awful to me. I'm not tech literate enough to explain but it's like sub-4k resolution makes everything that isn't immediately close to the camera seem so unstable. Like you can see the pixels crawling and realigning as you move the camera or move your character. With 4k the foreground is just stable and always looks the way it should regardless of your angle or movement.

>>713978962
>the reason behind "zoomed in" is to make the game more functional
Yes.

luv me 4k

Why do pctards like such small screens?

>he bought VA

>>713980503
Damn, I've never seen monitor this bad in person.

>>713980417
Move your hand next to your eyes. Now extend your arm as far as you can. If you pay close attention you can see that your had became smaller and your vision is no more blocked by it.

>>713980503
Surely that has to be some extremely cheap and/or defective VA.

>>713980503
>>713981230
no this is all va shit.
VA shills will lie to you and say it's fixied, it's not their special VA monitor, but it's a lie. they say that cope every year and troll people into buying shit.

>>713971854 (OP)
My 15'' laptop screen

>>713979072
what are your specs

>>713982131
ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM
RTX5090
Ryzen 9800X3D
32GB DDR5-6000
MSI Carbon X670E
two SSDs, one 2TB Nvme one 4TB SATA
and I mostly use it to play old RTS games and Frostpunk. Funny how that works out.

>Monitor
Lmao, i'm not a faggot.
I play on my '65 ultra hd tv with dolby surround.

>>713978889
>Pixels. Per. Inch.
That's just a cope for people who lack inches. Just keep telling yourself size doesn't matter, sweaty.

LG 4k 48" GQ900 OLED monitor.
I wish there was a 55" to upgrade to.

>>713971854 (OP)
Alienware AW3423DWF and I absolutely can't go back to anything with lower specs than this. Easily doubled my enjoyment of games.

>>713980503
For some reason, Samsung is the only manufacturer able to make good VAs

>>713971854 (OP)
I got like 30 monitors and television screens. It depends on whichever one I got hooked up.

>>713983685
It's because people don't want to sell premium VAs. They look at them as the cheap option, where Samsung will charge you $2500, but actually make it worth it.

>>713985001
>They look at them as the cheap option, where Samsung will charge you $2500, but actually make it worth it.
but will actually give you a VA that smears and costs you a lot as well
here we go, va shills have arrived, prepare for
>no this VA totally doesn't smear, please don't look at technical data and tests

>>713976446
I'm thinking about buying a 32'‘ 4K monitor with good image quality for work, but my 27’' 1440p is good for gaming and at the same time has excellent color accuracy. So I'm in this dilemma: on the one hand, I'd like something even better for work, but the chances of me worsening my gaming experience are very high. Unless I buy a 4K monitor that is good for both work and gaming, which would make the price astronomical...
:(

My friends, please recommend a monitor for use with my Switch 2 for around $500 if possible.

I think I will buy a 55" S95F 165hz QD-OLED TV and use it as my display and there is nothing you can do about it, OP

>>713986048
based

I've been trying to find a decent 4:3 monitor for retro games. Doesn't even have to be a CRT but finding a quality LCD with that aspect ratio is almost harder. I have a decent 5:4 LCD monitor but that isn't good enough.

And yes I really hate black bars

>>713985110
>never used a nice Samsung VA
>is a faggot
>calls people shills while using disingenuous speech, a tactic indicative of a shill
>licks cock
>fondles balls

>>713987570
>VA shill is winding up his script again
predictable

>>713987620
>shill goyslop pajeet consoomer
Aren't you tired of being South American?

>>713971854 (OP)
>You're not using a television are you?
Have been for 15 or so years. Current one is a 42 inch 4k sony.

>>713987745
>buy product or you are poor
typical shill script

>>713987158
Retro games run almost exclusively in 16:9. Unless you're confusing retro games with old games.
>>713987801
You're literally getting mad about people not using your tech preference, to the point where others in your call center are wondering why you can't make a sale.

>>713985110
>>713987620
>Thinks VAs haven't gotten better since 2005 while all other monitor techs have improved
Maybe read some reviews or articles from the past couple years, chump

>>713987904
>I'm not a shill, YOU'RE A SHILL!
and what am I selling, exactly? Retarded shill. All you can do is project, be it how you dread being poor while working 1 rupe per hour to post on 4chan to shill products
>>713987950
>VA shills on full damage control
told you, they center probably is on high alert now

>>713971854 (OP)

ROG Strix XG259QNG-W

Excellent monitor.

>>713988089
What am I shilling? VACorp VA panels by VA Industries?

>>713988557
All that dark money from Big VA©

>>713988671
>>713988557
VA monitors.

>>713971854 (OP)
Gigabyte G27Q is a 27" 1440p 144Hz IPS

>>713975854
based

>>713971854 (OP)
do fags unironically use 1440 or above. is it just an autism brag?

>>713988943
So I'm getting paid by VACorp. Check.

>>713990197
>do fags unironically use 1440 or above. is it just an autism brag?
no, some people just have standards and aren't willing to suffer how awful 1080p looks for new games

>>713990197
I enjoy 4k. Sometimes I have to upscale in newer stuff, but even older stuff benefits. Edges are smoother, and distant details (like enemy movement) are easier to see.

>>713990957
Yeah right because everybody who played Finals played it for the graphics and zoomed in to stretch their dicks.

>>713990957
>imagine wasting your money on 4k instead of going 8k

>>713990957
thats not how 1080p looks, thats how 1080p looks when stretched to 4k size.
congrats you played yourself.

>>713991000
And enemy movement up close is harder to keep track off because everything is bigger.

Even for "spotting distant enemies" lower resolution is actually better. This is very easy to demonstrate in Apex Legends. On 1080p a distant enemy will stick out as a sharp collection of pixels. On higher res the enemy silhouette will become smoother and the pixels will not stick out sharp. The effect happens at all ranges but is most noticeable over large distances.

>>713991224
>thats not how 1080p looks, thats how 1080p looks when stretched to 4k size.
I have a 27 inch monitor that has dual mode, both 4k and 1080p. That is what both of them look like on my monitor to my eye, there's no stretching going on.

I have been upgrading lately and thinking about picking up this WOLED monitor.
ASRock Phantom Gaming 31.5"
It has a dual mode that has 240hz for 4k and 480hz for 1080p. Seems like a solid choice. Any of fucks want to rain on my parade and educate me on why this wouldn't be the optimal choice on the market rn?

>>713971854 (OP)
>You're not using a tel*vision are you?
Once TVs started including low-input lag game modes and prior to QD-OLEDs hitting the monitor scene back in early 2022, TVs totally mogged monitors. I purchased a 42" C2 because OLED monitors were mostly non-existent.
>>713986048
>55" S95F
jfc those are some good specs. 400 nits full field brightness on an OLED. Do you find the raised blacks bothersome when there's light in the room?

1440p
180Hz
27"

>>713991473
4k doesn't make everything bigger. Screen size does. You can play 480p on a giant screen. As for enemies showing up better in 1080p, that's patently untrue. When you're dealing with 1/4 the pixels, some objects/enemies literally disappear.

>>713972536
Why would he not have a 4k monitor with a 5090? I have a 4k monitor with my 4090 and I'll never go back to less than that. Or is it just poor people being bitter again.

27" LG GP850-B 180hz
55" Sony Bravia X90L 120hz

>>713993291
show your chair fag

>>713993089
They don't disappear. They always retain at the very least one sharp pixel. People play in shitty fucked up stretched resolutions for this very reason. It makes even close targets stick out with sharp edges so when you see an enemy you just know in an instant that there is one.

>>713993386
You're literally dealing with 1/4 the pixels. Details have to be lost, and distant ones are the first to go.

>>713993504
For the pixel to DISAPPEAR you're talking like 10 kilometer distances what the fuck are you playing to begin with?

>>713990293
the problem with "the best" 240hz samsung va's is that they still aren't clear, they are also now strictly worse , expensive and obsolete compared to the new crop of oleds
in short, zero point even discussing them anymore
the va minileds on the market are even more smeary
va is a dead end tech

>>713991148
the problem with this meme is no good display exists at 8k res yet though else it would make sense

>>713992174
>Any of fucks want to rain on my parade and educate me on why this wouldn't be the optimal choice on the market rn?
compared to the qdoleds the brightness and color volume will be strictly worse
the 480hz 1080p mode how good it is is entirely dependent on how asrock has implemented it, see the comparison of how Asus vs LG implemented it, Asus did a way better job and LG botched it, in the same monitors using the same panel
Not sure how else Asrocks firmware/osd is if they botched it furthter
but Asus version of this panel is strictly better than LG, not sure where Asrock fits in this list
I have not researched it so I have no idea
if you don't want the 480hz dual mode you can buy a 4k qdoled instead, if you want the 480hz mode more you can buy 1440p panels instead

>>713992217
>Do you find the raised blacks bothersome when there's light in the room?
are you referring to qdoled or the matte coating? since both will raise
the qdoled raised black thing is way overblown but I am no oled autist elitist
the matte yes on monitors it looks strictly worse (g80sd) on the tvs? It's not bothersome or that bad I have seen it in show rooms multiple times

>>713993761
Imagine not playing games.

>Watching a movie or TV show on my 144Hz monitor
>Looks fine most of the time, but every once in a while the camera moves across a scene at just the right speed that it makes it look very stuttery
What causes this phenomenon?

>>713994247
I've never had this happen on my 144hz. What program are you using to watch video files?

>>713971854 (OP)
AOC CQ32G3SE
I thought bigger = better, will probably go for 24 or 27" monitors after this one dies

>>713994247
Sample and hold displays. Movies and shows are running at 24 FPS, so if the camera pans slowly it's okay, if it pans quickly it will appear blurry, but if they pan at medium speeds it will feel choppy because each frame is being held for the full 24 seconds.

>>713971854 (OP)
180ghz 1080p ips monitors which I paid 1.400 reais for (around 200 bux).
dont need no moar.

Woled, not even once.

>>713994897
It's not that bad in person, but it's getting left in the dust by QD-OLED.

>>713971854 (OP)
>What monitor are you gaming on /v/?
1440p 360hz QD-OLED.

I have an AOC 24G2. The perfect 1080p monitor. I will never fall for the 4k meme.

>>713994970
It doesn't help that standard measurements (i.e raw luminance) do not tell the whole story and XCR numbers aren't suitable to quick, snapshot marketing materials because it requires a bit more understanding.

>>713994801
>180 ghz
Holy framerates.

>>713994801
180 gigahertz? Holy fuck man

>>713971854 (OP)
>You're not using a tel*vision are you?
Yes i am

>>713991556
>I have a 27 inch monitor that has dual mode, both 4k and 1080p.
LAMO Are you fucking retarded?!
"dual mode"
HAHAHAH this faggot literally has no idea how technology works.

>>713995941
It is literally a switch to flip between resolutions. There is no visual difference or output difference between manually swapping resolution to 1080p or just changing mode to 1080p. I think you're the retarded one.

>>713991556
actual proper integer scaling without bilinear trash from 4k to 1080p should look as sharp as it can.

>>713991224
>thats how 1080p looks when stretched to 4k size.
If you have a monitor of a same size or similar size (like 24 inch 1080p and 27 inch 2160p) it's actually a good representation of how they will look to your naked eye. 1080p is really ugly and you will see it if you put similar sized 1080p and 2160p monitors side by side.

>>713995941
4k is 3840x2160, which is EXACTLY twice the number of pixels per axis of 1080p (1920x1080).
ALL 4k screens should just draw 1080p by just drawing every pixel of 1080p with 2x2 squares of the same color, but they don't, they do the "ACTIVATE THE BILINEAR SHIT" shit, and blur everything and looks like a N64 crap, because the N64 also does bilinear filtering to the final output because SGI was retarded.

>>713996794
Magic!

>>713997024

>>713971854 (OP)
I use a bang and olufsen beovision contour.

I’ll only upgrade when 8k isn’t a meme.