>>714030270>There's middleware involved that can't simply be "open sourced"Not my problem.
>>714030393>>gamers don't vote with their wallets the way I want them to, so we should have the government force a change in the industry that didn't occur naturallyYes.
>there's obviously a market for limited lifetime live service games.And there's a market for snake oil, doesn't mean it should be sold.
>The Crew never pretended to be anything elseIt pretended to be a single-player game by having a single-player campaign.
>now they're having second thoughtsWhy? What happened to cause those second thoughts to occur? Are you going to acknowledge that?
>where have I seen that before?So because boomers and feminists successfully petitioned governments to censor video games, we shouldn't be allowed to petition the government to improve video games? Why? Why are they allowed to ignore what consumers want and get the government to push their own agenda, but we're not? Doesn't seem very fair to me.