>>714048545
>clear shift
gimme some stats then, literally any numbers: average budget, number of ecchi tags, merch sales, biggest shows
you wanna posit that there was some fundamental shift, you bring in metrics before making judgments, lest i will continue to dismiss it all as I WAS THERE I REMEMBER IT non-citations
>Your prejudice
nigger what? i am literally just saying that cartoons make their money from merch, and not broadcasts, that is the fact of the industry irrespective of any specific demographic or even country
if you want to talk about the art of animation abstracted away from any "industry" and commercial concerns, then why the fuck are you even bringing up changes that came during the new millenium, you can't mesh such different perspectives together
>The differnce is not vague
talking about "degradation", "resistance to time", and "artists now" is exactly VAGUE because you're not describing specifics that come about when animating shit, but the general sentiment of how much better were things in the past
once again, if you wanna ramble about composition or backgrounds or whatever, then i will most likely agree on any concrete point, but THOSE NO-TALENT HACKS GOT INTO THE INDUSTRY WHEN DIGITAL LOWERED THE BAR AND RUINED IT is too vague (if not untrue) a statement that just leads to me bringing up garbage from the past or modern successes
that last bit is nothing more than a gotcha, rather than a contrapositive proof, which is why i wanna hear more concrete shit and not just LOOK AT IRRESPONSIBLE CAPTAIN TYLOR THEN LOOK AT LOVE HINA CHECK AND MATE
