>take World of Warships gameplay and replace all ships with shipgirls
>???
>profit!
Why does no one do this?

>thing
>thing, little girl
No wonder East Asians are going extinct from low birthrates.

>>714065219
>East Asians
It's not just them, we are all going extinct.

Is World of Warships any good?
Masturbating excessively to ship girls has given me an interest in naval history from wanting more lore-accurate faps, so a realistic WW2 ship game sounds nice

>>714065435
if africa disappeared tomorrow would anyone care?

>>714069414
I would because I live there

>>714067289
>>714065116 (OP)
These are cute. Shame my boy Marseille isnt represented

>>714069335
The ships themselves are realistic but WoWS is not a realistic WW2 ship game. It's free so you can just try it out and form your own opinion.
If you decide to try just don't forget to use invite code when making an account for freebies, you can find the codes on the internet.

>>714065116 (OP)
To give a serious answer; boats are big and have lots of compartments like ammo storage, gun batteries, the conning tower, engine room etc. Part of the fun are these bits being damaged over time during a battle, lowering the performance of the vessel, incentivizing a level of accuracy on the shooter's part. Boatgirls don't have these because they're just cartoon humans with navel accessories, so the gameplay would just be a slow pace third-person shooter, it'd feel less like a navel battle and more like a bunch of wizards skating on water and casting spells at long ranges. I'm sure there's an audience for that, and you'd be able to drain their wallets by selling skins/costume so they can paly dress up, but it wouldn't be the same, and it's dubious if those who like WoWs as is would immigrate in mass to sustain it.

>>714065116 (OP)
That already exists and it's called Crapzur Lane.

>>714069335
it used to be fun but like wargaming always does to their games, they fuck up balance and keep adding more shit.