>>714180731>>714180889I don't follow this shit, but apparently the Fungus Youtuber Man has decided to make a campaign to ban corporations from making games unplayable in the future, like Ubisoft did with The Crew 2. The idea is: if you sell a product, it needs to be functional in some way or another, even if it's something online, it needs to at least continue to work offline, even if you play the game alone.
So this faggot that the OP posted made a video saying that he's against it, because the government would make indie online games prohibitive, because indies would have to spend their whole money on servers and they would go broke or some shit like that, which has nothing to do with the initial issue.
Then other e-celebrities pointed out to the faggot that he was starting from different premises and therefore his conclusion was invalid for the issue being discussed, but he didn't give a shit and decided to double down because I guess that way he doesn't have to admit that his opinions on things aren't well-founded or some shit.