>>714208040
No they are nagging and steadily act like shit because they are getting phased out by the more recent models. Then they have the gal to hit you with the "am not like the other girls"
>>714207219
They can't get a woman so it's easier for them to pretend that they just have really special taste in partner. This way they can also reject every man.
one of the only male vidya characters whos in-game model is so attractive, i have repeatedly felt the need to stop playing his game because his pretty face compels me to jerk off.
>>714208040
Seriously, why do girls get all the good clothes like miniskirts, crop tops, bikinis, spaghetti straps, bunny suits, maid dresses and belly dancer costumes?
What do males get instead? It's unfair.
>>714208730
i mean don't get me wrong, i love his femboy r34 stuff and the honeybee inn scene definitely gave me a new kink, but he's so attractive in his usual soldier get-up. just remove the pants and let me to go town on that bussy, that's all i need.
They are completely brainwashed and brainrotten by their porn addiction anon. Let alone they are so lonely they are trying to open their dating option. It's why bisexuals are not a real sexuality but very mentally ill and lonely porn addict heterosexuals.
These losers will end up a suicide statistic soon.
>>714209197
I like anal the most because it is said to be very painful, especially with no lube, which is extra degrading and humiliating to the partner.
However, oral is also nice because the partner is forced to swallow the cum and it directly goes into the stomach and fills and bloats it up. It's like forcefeeding cum.
>>714207219
I like girls too, just something about dominating a girly submissive fag while they're dressed like a sexy maid or something that just really gets my blood pumping. I'm not saying it's a good thing either, just being honest. In fact I'm kinda disgusted by it but the whole thing just tickles my brain in a dark primal way that's hard to resist
>>714206857 (OP)
Why do porn addicted subhuman coomer simp freaks who always cry over trannies and pretend to be right wing and anti-woke love tw*nkoids so much?
>twinks >most posts are about femshit
Prove that newfags have no taste and no experience. Sad that you kissless hugless virgins have fried your brains with porn so much that you need something taboo for your silly straight mind to get turned on over and the best you can come up with is ‘w-what if woman b-but call it a boy!’. Yet you’re still to puritan to fap to chad fetishes in gfur threads or just get on sniffies to find a twink to breed. Straights like you will always be funny like watching a train wreck. If you need to cope by putting female clothes on a hyper-fem (((boy))) you will never make it.
>>714211618
Except for Cloud and Link non of the things posted are actual twinks.
It’s all just brainrotted porn addict coomer femshit. That’s how you can spot desperate straightoids.
>>714209064
the only thing i'll agree with you on is the fact that femboys are exclusively a bisexual thing
i get that that topic isn't going anywhere, "i'm not gay, i just like femboys" will forever be a thing, but it's so fucking tiresome. as someone who's flirted with certain online communities that are very much real gay, an appreciation for femboys requires a desire for both the masculine and the feminine. i don't get why it's so hard for people to understand that.
>>714212093
Sure! Here's a quick summary of >>714211791's post.
I am a faggot and I want everyone to be a faggot like me otherwise I get irrationally angry.
Would you like a summary of something else?
>>714212715
I don’t actually eat—or order—titty skittles (or anything else, for that matter). But I have to say, that’s quite a phrase. If you’re aiming for humor, mission accomplished!
If you meant something else—like a summary of a real item, a funny story, or you want me to invent a fake “titty skittles” order just for laughs—I’m game. Just say the word.
Statistically, a woman will more likely kill a child, rape a child, falsely accuse men of sex crime, divorce a man, and sexually abuse a man, assault a man, and murder a man.
I'm not pro-fags or anything, but I see absolutely no data backing this up.
>>714207627 >>714208513 >>714209439
These are the only 3 twinks ITT. Twinks are not femboys. They're just lithe men with boyish features. Twinks do not have the wide hips and narrow shoulders that commonly characterize traps, femboys, or whatever new cancer shows up. Everything just gets boiled into some meaningless stew of word slop.
>>714207219 >>714207219
Allow me to explain: from samurais to Romans to Greeks, twinks have always been a delicacy only enjoyed by those of higher status. It's easy enough for twink on twink action when you're young but to fuck twinks past the age of 21, 25 especially, means you have something about you different from others. Usually requiring good looks, a good body, and a good personality which all 3 of these become harder to maintain the older you get. Twinks also have an expiration date sometime in their mid-20s at the latest so you can only get the pick of the litter for so long.
Basically, you plebs no nothing about twink fucking nor would I expect you to. >the amount of roman emperors who fucked twinks on the regular and only fucked women if it meant siring a son.
>>714212545
The way I see it, if you're into traps but not into guys you clearly have a type and I can see why someone like that would think of themselves as straight but I think that would fall into bisexual anyways.
What I don't understand is why actual faggots come into these threads, which are clearly trap oriented ones, instead of posting their own.
>>714212908
Attraction to women is purely for procreation. I pity the fools but i appreciate that they have sons for the more sophisticated men to enjoy and love.
>>714212908
men are more likely to actually commit sex crimes, sexually abuse women and assault, murder, steal and break things in general. >divorce a man
literally the type of statistic a fag would use against women. there aren't gay marriages. no one else is divorcing men.
