Thread 714281612

why is it okay to "romance" a druid who can shapeshift into an aimal during intercourse but its not okay to romance a 1000 year old elf with the physique of a 12-year-old?

mmmm booba

elf ears sex

>>714281612 (OP)
I want the right once to force the left's head straight into her anal cavity with no mercy.

>>714281612 (OP)
>this is "okay"! this is "not okay"!
Why do you listen to what redditoids say?

Because people want you to click their outrage social media posts and news stories then conformism seeking managers/women at companies follow what they read in the attention seeking posts and news stories.

>>714281612 (OP)
because women older than 12 can't go back to being 12 again
that's really it, it's all because of hurt women feefees

>>714282029
This.
The "masses" will always be a panicky reactionary mess. Its not even because they're particularly stupid or evil or whatnot, its just because people are concerned with other people's first impressions of them.

>>714281612 (OP)
>with the physique of a 12-year-old?
>physique of a 12-year-old?
>12-year-old
Because you reveal your true perverted intent. Sick freak.

>>714281612 (OP)
when you think about it, the romans had 12 as the age of marriage, as did the Christian church. When my country was formed less than 300 years ago the age was 10-12. It was like this for the longest time, it wasnt until the last hundred years that it was arbitraily decided that that age should be pushed up to 16. Now within the last few decades, it has been pushed up to 18, and there is talk about pushing it higher to 21. Im not saying anything, I just think it is really peculiar and I wonder what the future has in store for us.

>>714281612 (OP)
Because nobody likes a nonce.

>>714282637
Because society evolved, we realized that starting a family and having kids working at those ages was retarded and didn't work. It wasn't beneficial for a 16yo boy to a be a father and working, same thing with the girls.

>>714282840
yeah but have our human brains evolved in the last 300 years to not see pubescent women attractive? it seems birth rates have plummited at the same time, so what do we do? we bring in immigrants that dont care if they get pregnant at 14, but we expect to hold ourselves to a higher standard and we dont get married until both man and women are in their 30s.

>>714282554
>thinks "animal during intercourse" is totally normal though
you always self-report. total degenerates, leaping at the chance to shame someone for what they've said, just to help ease your own guilt

>>714283243
this. we are so evolved and civilized and mature that we HAVE to import hordes of immigrants, else we'll supposedly go extinct

fuck all of this shit, honestly

>>714281612 (OP)
The real answer is that the former is a dirty joke, something disgusting that's entertaining in it's vileness.
A person fucking an animal is nasty.
Fucking an elf that looks like she's 12, but is actually 1000 years old isn't a dirty joke.
It's the sexual fantasy of pedos.
It's not entertaining, even though it's nasty, because it's real.
There are people who want to fuck kids and you can read about them abusing children in the news.
People don't want to be reminded in this in games.

There's grown men here trying to justify attraction towards kids.

>>714283243
and who the fuck are 14 year old 'incels' supposed to be attracted to in order to not be an incel? these lefty pearl clutching retards need to explain how young teenage boys are only allowed to be 'comfortable with their sexuality' when it involves being a fucking faggot?

>>714281612 (OP)
IMAGINE the sex

>>714281612 (OP)
who are you quoting

>>714283607
>if you want to kill people in GTA and find it fun you are a murderer IRL
ogey

>>714283607
Interspecies reviewers made several jokes about elf-human relationships that were all based on their actual ages.
The elf fucking old human women are young relative to himself and the human fucking the neotanous looking old hag elf, both are played for laughs.
The moral of the story is that its fiction who gives a shit?

>>714281612 (OP)
You aren't wrong but you're an annoying autistic niggerfaggot who spams this board all day long, fuck off.

>>714283607
>there are no people who want to fuck animals

>>714282637
life expectancy
>im not saying anything
youre not thinking anything either.

>>714281612 (OP)
Fucking an animal is legal and moral dumbass

>>714284320
my point is that zoophiles aren't front in mind, and that's why you can make a joke about a person fucking an animal
if dogs were getting raped and it was in the news how Fluffy came back it's owner, crying, with a bleeding ass after getting lost in the woods, it would be controversial to have zoophilia in games
it's entirely contextual and depends on the zeitgeist, which is why it's different between countries

>>714285463
Goatfuckers are prominent enough to be a national stereotype. What the fuck do you mean zoophiles arent well known degenerates?

>>714286068
the average person is much more aware of pedos than they are of zoophiles
I've heard of pedos much more often, the least time I heard about zoophiles is when a dog brothel in Serbia was mentioned in the news years ago.
Pedos are absolutely much more relevant. They're in their own league.

>>714283660
The same thing every male of any age is attracted to: busty women with long hair, fully matured faces and bodies, roughly aged 18-21.
14 year olds should be attracted to 14 year olds, they should want to have sex with them, but given the choice between a 14 year old and a slightly older woman they should pick the older one because neoteny is supposed to be repulsive and unattractive (since it’s literally a genetic defect we’ve evolved to find unattractive).
And let’s be real, this discussion is not about what 14 year olds are attracted to. We’re talking men in their 20s and 30s and older who are incapable of attracting women their own age, let alone from the prime bracket, who have fetishized the vulnerability and ignorance of the youngest possible age that girl could be sexually active because she would be more attainable, and it gives them a reason to claim to not be attracted to what they should be attracted to until they brainwash themselves into genuinely holding those desires.

>>714281612 (OP)
>Another BG3 seethe thread

>>714282029
>>714282314
Even worse than "redditoids" but somehow you faggots think you're "cool" because you're on some dog shit site like this. Kill yourselves.

>>714289593
>neoteny is supposed to be repulsive and unattractive
lmao what the fuck. Youth has been associated with beauty across every culture and every time period. Neoteny drives the global behemoth that is the Japanese animation and comics industry.

>>714286068
I would think at least 95% of westerners if not close to 100% think having sex with goats and other domesticated animals is just a joke about farmers that doesn’t actually happen, and see all the talk about how prevalent it is in third world countries as just jokes and racist lies. You show them documentaries and they think it’s propaganda.

>>714281963
I want the left one to magiically shrink down and wear her as a condom while assfucking the right one.

>>714290043
Neoteny and youth are not the same thing, the fact that you conflate the two is exactly the problem I’m talking about. You are also confusing beauty as it pertains to sexual attractiveness with beauty as it pertains to affection, familial love, and aesthetics. A Renaissance painting of a naked 12 year old girl is not supposed to illicit sexual desire, it is supposed to make you think “this girl is beautiful because I can see the woman that she will turn into”

>>714289786
I like how you made up some bullshit strawman and then were still wrong. No one is less cool that redditors.

>>714290419
Attraction to neoteny doesn't imply what you're really trying to imply. It's completely normal for men to find women attractive because they possess neotenous traits. Things like them being physically small and delicate, or having a more rounded face with big eyes.

>>714290241
nice

>>714282554
the point is if that's bad then you also have to say them TFing into a bear is bad for the same reasons. Either both are ok or neither are ok.

>>714282637
anon... people didn't live as long so marrying young was a necessary evil to keep the species alive.

>>714281612 (OP)
I like both

>>714282126
This. Women drag each other down when they ge tolerate. The "assembley woman" play made fun of this fact.
>>714282554
Tits or GTFO, roastie.

>>714289593
>given the choice between a 14 year old and a slightly older woman they should pick the older one
Fuck pedophiles and all but this is completely fucking retarded.

>>714289593
OK old roastie
How about
>young women are fertile
>men are attracted to fertility
>you know nothing about history or when women get married.

>>714281612 (OP)
>Twitter has brainwashed people into thinking left is what 12 year olds look like
I swear the actual agenda is more pedophilic than it is puritanical.

>>714283607
The puritans you're fighting for think Frieren is a loli. If the discussion was as simple as "don't fuck kids" it would be agreeable but these people are deranged.

>>714281963
Anal vore is a fantastic fetish.

left left left

what about a mass produced loli doll that's being remote controlled by a hag?