>>714394165
you shouldn't, a company should be able to charge you money for a game you need to be online to play and they have the right to take it away from you at any point since they made it
>>714394628
ross scott makes machinima videos and has weird autistic obsessions he talks about on youtube which his fans tolerate because of how handsome he is
>>714392456 (OP)
What do they actually want to accomplish? They can't force a company to keep running a server for older games at a loss. It's up to the consumers to simply boycott online-only games if they dislike the practice.
>>714394735
calm down piratesoftware, it's just asking for it to be legal to run local/community servers once the game is abandoned by the developer/publisher
>>714394628
Games that would be killed when the server shuts down need an end of life plan (this doesn't count for services like subscription based games)