>>714480521 (OP)I agree with the sentiment behind this movement, but I cannot understand the backlash against piratesoftware for pointing out a fact.
The wording of the compaign is such that any game would need to be left in a "functional, playable state".
Essentially, that means once an online game (e.g. WoW, Rift, or any other MMORPG) has had its official servers closed down, I need to be able to open my .exe, just as I did beforehand and have a game I can play.
That doesn't leave developers with many options, they either need to find someone else to host their servers before they can legally stop running their own, or they need to convert the game to singleplayer compatible, which for many games is completely ridiculous.
All of the other "solutions" ive seen people post just do not align with the "funcitonal, playable state" mandate in the campaign.
Despite the feeding frenzy of popular content creators I think piratesoftware is right on this one. It's just become fashionable to shit on him.