>>714703248
>never said otherwise, you're the only one here trying to push some dipshit adversarial dichotomy. the fact remains that Morrowind saved the company from closure,
That's not even what he says
He says, they felt the company could close, they had released 2 flops in a row after daggerfall (perhaps more, I don't know their full release cycle but I know redguard for example was a massive flop) and then they took another risk with Morrowind. They felt as if it had saved them but there's no sort of objective fact surrounding it.
He literally says in your quote
>We felt the company was going to go out of business
>we made some bad games and we made some mistakes
I read that to mean they made 2 shit games, were terrifed that they would make a 3rd but thankfully Morrowind turned out good breathing life into the company that had a string of bad games prior to it.
The ACTUAL facts are that Elder Scrolls was not defined by Morrowind, nobody on the internet thinks of "Morrowind" when you say Elder Scrolls which if we go back was the INITIAL argument that you changed into being "saved" - Here
>>714689753 with your response changing it to "saved"
>>714690745 for some weird reason.
When people online hear Elder Scrolls, their brain goes to Skyrim.
Nobody gave a shit about Morrowind on release (Sold worse than Daggerfall at launch btw) and nobody gives a fuck about it now.
Cope
