What did he mean by this?

>>714722436 (OP)
Mobile games.

it means movie, merch and shit

>>714722436 (OP)
He means poorfags fuck off

Emulato-oh wait.

It means little Timmy will watch the mario movie and then ask his mommy for a mario game

>>714722436 (OP)
Not what he said. Click bait.

>>714722436 (OP)
People are already doing that. By masturbating to the rule 34 of their characters and fucking the plushies. Kek

So, what bad news for PlayStation is on the horizon this time eric?

>>714722436 (OP)
Ah geez dood, four fifty? I can’t do four fifty, man. I hurt my leg bro; they got me on these pills.

>>714722436 (OP)
He never said this, but he should have.

>>714722436 (OP)
Not what he said, you fell for clickbait - AGAIN.

>that time when this was posted before and all the low IQ retards defended the clickbait title by warping the statement into something different from what it actually was

>>714722436 (OP)
>don mattrick
:(
>don mattrick, nintendo
:DDDDD

I'll just play it at a higher framerate on my phone in a few months when the emulators are ready

>>714722436 (OP)
Sounds gay.

>>714722623
>He means poorfags fuck off

Based. Feels good knowing my blond-haired, blue-eyed children can safely play Nintendo Switch 2 without having to interact with niggers and spics.

>>714722436 (OP)
>Buy the merch
>Buy the movie(s)
>Go to the theme park(s) as often as you convince yourself you can
>Continue to buy on switch 1
>EnGaGe EnGaGe EnGaGe
It's a mystery. I hope they'll do ok, times are tough, and I'm sure they're just barely making it by with their millions of zombi-er, eh, "loyal fans" and the totally optional but you'll be nagged if you don't have it PrEmiuM SuBsCriPtiOn

PC.

They are secretly endorsing emulation.

The solution is so simple.

>>714723145
Based

>>714722436 (OP)
Out of context quote of a full statement.

>>714722945
Different from this guy that was actually caught on camera saying exactly that.

if he could get away with Shuntaro Furukawa absolutely would shoot up a group of soilennial Nintendo Adults at a gaming convention

>>714723597
That directly conflicts with the modern zoomy, and their need to make a bajillion dollars an hour for less than no work. Having any kind of work ethic and having pride in an honest day's work is for suckers, anon.

>>714723717
He would never do that.

What were people expecting the Switch 2 to cost, anyway? The same price as the Switch 1?

>>714722436 (OP)
>we already have a console for that, it's called nintendo 360

>>714725532
I can't speak for poorfags, but my issue is with how Nintendo has been conducting themselves since the beginning of switch 1. But most these days don't care about right or wrong, they just want their insatiable appetites constantly addressed

>>714723597
Just because I have the money, doesn't mean I'm going to automatically spend it on a rip-off.

If I took a fat steamy shit on the floor and tried to sell it to you for $100, would you buy it just because you have the money to do so?

Nintendo is trying to sell less, for less quality, and for more money. They're a multi billion dollar company and one of the most prolific faces of the gaming industry, and they're still trying to grift the people who have been keeping them in business for decades.

The truly sad part is that they are going to get away with it too. They could literally make it a requirement to suck off each member of the board of directors while they put cigarettes out on your chest in order to buy any Nintendo products, and the fan base would do it.

>>714722436 (OP)
He's endorsing porn

>>714725778
I just see things as they are. Most companies would probably love to be as uncompromising on their policies as Nintendo. Nintendo's just one of the few who can actually get away with it. At their core, all companies are only out for themselves and their own. The ones who compromise are the ones who feel they have to in order to get ahead. None of them do anything out of any sense of altruism. Even charity donations are done for the sake of rep boosts and tax cuts.

>>714722436 (OP)
Good
Stop being poor

>>714725797
You're just used to console manufacturers selling more powerful hardware at a loss. It's a somewhat odd situation where people believe that a business is morally and ethically obligated to lose money. People are just mad that Nintendo refuses to play ball. They actually want to make a profit on all their products.

>>714725532
There are no bad products, only bad prices
It should realistically be half of what it is, the point of consoles is to sell at a loss so you get into their ecosystem
Nintendo has the biggest first party library, they get way more per switch user than Sony or Microsoft yet they have the audacity to sell their console at a profit
The only reason you have to buy their consoles over emulating is if you literally cannot wait or you're desperate to play online, you could grab a tin can made of used parts that utterly dwarfs the switch for the same price which is still unheard of for the other two

>>714725532
>The same price as the Switch 1?
Switch 1 is decade old hardware, and they never reduced its price outside of a Switch Lite variant. I wouldn't have expected a Switch 2 to be dramatically more expensive despite still leveraging off the shelf parts for the most part.

>>714722436 (OP)
He never said this. Anti-japan western media.

>>714722436 (OP)
emulators obviously

>>714726567
>the point of consoles is to sell at a loss so you get into their ecosystem
Who decided this? Sony and Microsoft only started going it because they felt they had no choice. Originally, consoles weren't sold at a loss at all. Things only started getting that way once Sony threw their had into the ring.

This is neither a law nor a rule, and certainly not one that Nintendo would ever engage in willingly. The point of products isn't to "bring people into your ecosystem", the point of products is to make a profit. Selling a product at a loss is a compromise, not some sort of merchant's commandment.

>>714723661
>Out of context quote of a full statement

What's the true context? "We are going to lower Switch 2 prices for christmas season" or "Go buy merch/watch movies/play with your old games"?

>>714726084
>At their core, all companies are only out for themselves and their own
Sure, but it's how you define success
In pre-reagan murica, businesses prided themselves in how well their employees were treated. Reagan era onwards, success is measured by how many future generations of your kin will never have to work a single day of there lives
At least regarding consumer practices, Gamecube was the pre era, wii and wii u are kinda a grey area, and switch onward is full blown corpo circlejerking
I refuse to roll over and play along just because
>iTs JuSt HoW iT iS

>>714726939
Nintendo treats their employees well though. That's the one thing no one criticizes them for. And you don't have to play along. You can just refuse to engage, which I guess you are.

>>714726776
Obviously, they can choose not to, they can treat themselves as some premium product which they're not
In the end it's their reputation on the line for peddling e waste that's as far away from a gift horse as it can get

>>714722436 (OP)
Fucking clickbait and you retards fall for journalism tricks.

Here's the actual quote.

piracy

>>714722436 (OP)
Hit the high seas

>>714727127
>Nintendo treats their employees well though
I mean, fine, I guess? But I made a point of saying for the sake of the analogy, regarding consumer practices. But no worries. I think we have a mutual understanding of sharing our views while realizing they are unlikely to change

>>714727267
Sony and Microsoft didn't start selling at a loss just for their reputation. They did it specifically to undercut the competition. It was from the 7th generation onwards that selling at a loss became an absolute necessity. Remember how expensive the PS3 was? Even THEN, it was being sold at a loss. The PS3 cost so fucking much to produce that selling it for a profit would have guaranteed no one would buy it, so they sold it at a loss. And then Microsoft came along and undercut even THAT. Sony had absolutely no choice but to sell the PS3 at the cost they did, anything more would have been utterly unreasonable for consumers. But they also couldn't afford to slash its price any further, despite the sheer amount of criticism lobbied towards it for its seemingly excessive price tag.

The fact that Nintendo can continue to sell their consoles for profit means that they're able to do so. Consumers have shown that they're willing to engage those prices. If Sony and Microsoft could afford to do the same, they absolutely would. The reason they don't is because they can't. They HAVE to do it in order to sell at all.

Selling at a loss only happens when a business is backed into a corner and sees no other way out.

>>714727127
Anon, you're talking about Japan here. You don't need to do much to treat your employees well over there.

>>714722623
Muh consume
Muh worship MONEY like a kike
Be the best goycattle!

>>714727337
I'm so glad their economy is collapsing

>>714723641
Diddy's tail is connected with Dixie's ass

>>714727337
>We wanna see how much we can get away with for as long as we can, but buy what you can in the meantime
Ah, that's so much better

>>714725797
>Food analogy

>>714722436 (OP)
He was obviously referring to piracy and emulation

>>714727641
>. But they also couldn't afford to slash its price any further, despite the sheer amount of criticism lobbied towards it for its seemingly excessive price tag.
PS3 dropped price a few months after from its initial 600, so stop sucking sony's cock

>>714725367
There is no pride to be found in working
The only thing working hard will ever get you in this life is harder work

>>714728784
>There is no pride to be found in working
I'll grant that, at least in today's world of the select few hundred wanting everything for nothing when they already have ≥98% of everything
But I'm fortunate to have a good paying job, with great benefits that isn't easy, but does keep me in decent shape
I do wish the labor world wasn't so black and white, but here we are, I guess

>>714723597
Where are the jobs that actually hire?!

>>714723597
What's this job application joke about anyway? I never understood it.

Stop being poor?

>>714726278
You're right that Nintendo isn't morally obligated to not fuck over their massive customer base. I'm not morally obligated to buy their products or speak about them positively either.

>>714728531
> I don't like this particular type of analogy so it's automatically wrong. I'm the main character.

>>714730152
If you keep fucking talking like that I'm gonna put a baby in you.

>>714731595
But anon, men can't impregnate men!

>>714731748
That doesn't matter, there's no way you can talk so ex- exci- excellency and perfect at the same time. It's beautiful, you're beautiful, honey. Keep it coming, say some more, please? You gotta pay to hear that on most. But she gives it out for free! Or he, but I hope this is a she because I'm not gay. But I might be gay if this is a guy.

>>714727337
What does this mean? Are they going to lower the price to make it affordable or what?

>>714725532
I was expecting 400 bucks with $60-70 games and peripherals the same cost as sw1

>>714722436 (OP)
Microsoft controls the games media. They are behind this campaign to slander Nintendo.

>>714722436 (OP)
Mobile games.

They should invest in browser games. They don't have to be full fledge AAA titles, but arcade style games. stuff a kid would play in computer class or on their chrome book at lunch.

>>714729973
Zoomers are becoming increasingly incapable of completing higher education requirements, participating in the workforce, and functioning in face to face social situations apparently. You might say they're cursed by convenience. No pressure to acquire practical skills, mobile UI saturation resulting in little to no information technology ability, raised online with a strong sense of personal entitlement and righteousness, and hyper reliance on AI generated material.

Is the first generation that is overtly failing to adapt and grow into even barely functional adults.

>>714729915
Wait for ICE to open up jobs

>>714736656
Ah yes, all the low paying and bullshit jobs with little to no benefits that anericans are too good for
I'm certain there won't be...
EVEN MORE unforseen consequences :D
not that it matters, I'm having fun watching this circus implode

>>714736918
A low paying “bullshit job” will allow you to buy games anon

>>714737240
Not necessary for me, I actually have a decent paying job with damn good benefits
>>714737240
If you live in a fridge box, adapt to get food via photosynthesis, and ride a bike literally everywhere to avoid fuel costs, insurance, etc.
sure. Otherwise, lol. As a matter of fact, lmao

>>714722623
Sneed paypig