>>714735987
>You might think that people would gradually understand that these stigmas were myth
rather than fact and that blacks would be able, over time, to prove themselves just as
competent, law-abiding and clean as whites. In fact, the opposite happened – these prejudices
became more and more entrenched as time went by. Since all the best jobs were held by
whites, it became easier to believe that blacks really are inferior. ‘Look,’ said the average
white citizen, ‘blacks have been free for generations, yet there are almost no black professors,
lawyers, doctors or even bank tellers. Isn’t that proof that blacks are simply less intelligent
and hard-working?’ Trapped in this vicious circle, blacks were not hired for white-collar jobs
because they were deemed unintelligent, and the proof of their inferiority was the paucity of
blacks in white-collar jobs.
>... Most sociopolitical hierarchies lack a logical or biological basis – they are nothing but the
perpetuation of chance events supported by myths. That is one good reason to study history.
If the division into blacks and whites or Brahmins and Shudras was grounded in biological
realities – that is, if Brahmins really had better brains than Shudras – biology would be
sufficient for understanding human society. Since the biological distinctions between different
groups of Homo sapiens are, in fact, negligible,
what does this kike mean biological distinctions between races are negligible?
has he been top the rape capital of the world congo? or capte town? cape town was a white city with european standards until blacks were let in and it became a murder capital
