← Home ← Back to /v/

Thread 714847275

14 posts 2 images /v/
Anonymous No.714847275 >>714847303 >>714848136 >>714848707
Walhart is misrepresented in Awakening. The intro the chapter 19 is fucked.
Sources:
>EN:https://youtu.be/7zZ-7n3AAzY?list=PL20XzL-uaC8IcOhUI9ASZqKoGHzdwKTYl&t=506
>JP:https://youtu.be/u3kIZEBxcEs?list=PL4JxhkcouWAJREeV7NNk93ANNLDXOzPee&t=85

>*Sigh* If only there were someone with the intellect to appreciate my talents...
>ใ‚ใ‚ใƒผใ‚“! ใ‚ขใ‚ฟใ‚ทใฃใฆใฐใ€ใ™ใ”ใƒผใ„!ใพใ•ใซ็ฅžใฎๅฆ‚ใ่ป็•ฅใ€‚ใ€‚ใ€‚ใ€‚ใ€‚!?
Excellus's line here directly leads into Walhart's rant. So it's important that they keep the "็ฅžใฎๅฆ‚ใ่ป็•ฅ". Some form of "god-like strategy". Not god-like as in amazing but actual divinity deity.
> ๆˆ‘ใฏ็ฅžใ‚’่ถ…ใˆใฆใ„ใ่€…
>Who is greater than the Gods?
This is why he's pissed. He's greater than the gods but in the ENG it's about Excellus's intellect instead of the deity part. And this is really significant because of Fire Emblem Gaiden. Walhart is a descendant of Alm. Alm killed the gods(well just Duma)that ruled and made humanity the rulers in place of the gods. Walhart is following in Alm's footsteps. He's more extreme with the conqueror part but still So going ahead a few lines
>Well,Excellus, that seems to contradict your last statement. What say you?
>ใ‚†ใˆใซใ€ ็ฅžๅฆ‚ใใจๅŒ็ญ‰ใฎ่ป็•ฅใชใฉๆˆ‘ใฏๅฟ…่ฆใจใ—ใฆใŠใ‚‰ใฌใ€‚
>ใ‚จใ‚ฏใ‚ปใƒฉใ‚คใ€ใใฎ็ญ–ใฏ็„ก็”จใ€‚
In the JP he's saying Excellus's plan is worthless. For Walhart a "divine strategy" or tactic just isn't needed. It's not about no one appreciating Excellus's intellect. Walhart is pissed that Excellus would even imply that such a strategy is necessary,
>ใƒดใ‚กใ€ใƒดใ‚กใƒซใƒใƒซใƒˆ้™›ไธ‹!?ไฝ•ใ‚’่ก€่ฟทใฃใŸใ“ใจใ‚’!?
Excellus is asking what set Walhart off. He doesn't understand why Walhart seeming losing it. And you can't blame Excellus because he was just saying the strategy was really good. Yet Walhart is talking about surpassing gods. But to us it makes more sense assuming you know the connection to Alm. The ENG's
Anonymous No.714847303 >>714848707
>>714847275 (OP)
Continued
>...My-my master! I assure you, I meant no offense! I only celebrate achievements in your service, master. To your glory
Completely misses that. Instead of being confused, Excellus just thinks Walhart is offended that Excellus feels unappreciated. Sure the Alm stuff could be me reading too deep and Walhart just hates the idea of sitting in a castle doing nothing. But the ENG's changes aren't necessary. They misread the scene it's not about Excellus disrespecting Walhart, it's about Walhart's ideology. Which is also misunderstood
>Glory is won on the battlefield! Glory is meeting your enemy's eyes and watching the hope drain away with his life...Glory is not won holed up in a castle with plots and cowardly schemes. And I'll be dead before I let some dynast farm lord take today's glory in my stead
>ๅพŒใซ่จ€ใ„่จณใ•ใˆ่จฑใ•ใšๅฎŒ่†š็„กใใพใงใซๅฉใๆฝฐใ™ใ“ใจใ‚’่จ€ใ†! ๅœงๅ€’็š„ใชใ‚ๅŠ›ใ‚’่ฆ‹ใ›ใคใ‘ใ‚ˆ!ๅ‹ใฆใ‚‹้“ใชใฉใชใ„ใ“ใจใ‚’ๆ•™ใˆใ‚ˆ!ใใ‚Œไปฅๅค–ใ‚’ๆˆ‘ใฏๅ‹ๅˆฉใจ่ชใ‚ใฌ!
ๅ‹ๅˆฉ seems to get translated as glory. But it should be more like victory or conquest. He not talking about glory, he's talking about how he wins. Beat them until they're unrecognizable. Display overwhelming and teach his enemies that there is no route to victory against him. The 2nd EN line there gets the idea somewhat but everything else is wrong. He doesn't talk about cowardly schemes, nor anything about a dynast farm lord taking his glory. He's not even talking about killing his enemies actually. It's about breaking them down, destroying their will to resist. It's completely different and this all stems from changing Excellus's lines. Making it about his intellect and having him apologize for insulting Walhart. Having Excellus bring up glory(ๅ‹ๅˆฉ) instead of Walhart. Just F- work
Anonymous No.714847450
Is this good?
Anonymous No.714847549
Awakening is a bad game regardless.
Anonymous No.714847585 >>714848663
is there a single fire emblem game that doesnt have a beyond fucked translation
Anonymous No.714847660
Still wouldn't play awakening if you paid me
Anonymous No.714847745
I fuarking love awakening and /v/ can kiss my ass.
Anonymous No.714848136 >>714848349
>>714847275 (OP)
>Oh yeah, Walhart was invading Ylisse to stop Grima
Valm arc was a mistake
Anonymous No.714848349 >>714848724 >>714850090
>>714848136
I never said. I think that is stated in-game at that guy, Robin's dad but not in this scene. It's only about Walhart and his ideology.
Anonymous No.714848663
>>714847585
Is there a single "Japanese" Nintendo game that doesn't have a beyond fucked translation?
Hell even the japanese translation of Advance Wars Days of Ruin is different than the one in the US.
Anonymous No.714848707 >>714848926
>>714847275 (OP)
>>714847303

Well done OP, it's very important that we get the nuance translation right in this children's game made for babies that everyone forgot about 10 years ago
Anonymous No.714848724
>>714848349
*by Robin's dad(I don't remember his name because I tuned out the katakana I'm ashamed)
Anonymous No.714848926 >>714850090
>>714848707
See I appreciate your reply but there's no way I got the nuances across. I just got the broad shit that any toddler would get. Except the translators. Their minds are alien to me.
Anonymous No.714850090
>>714848349
>>714848926
I screwed up the reply twice, do over.
I never said Walhart invaded to stop Gima. That's not in the scene at all. However Robin's dad says something to that effect I believe but that's a couple chapters later. And not the focus of the scene I'm talking about.