>>714862073 (OP)
Why would you even want to play that garbage in the first place? It's insane that a game from 1998 (Ocarina of Time) has more combat depth than this slop made decades later.
>>714862073 (OP)
Why are Deckfags more autistic than Tendies?
Why do you flex playing a handheld on your disgusting soiled beds? Performance is going to be impaired on either platform.
You already have a $5000 gaming rig to emulate this on.
>>714862843
No? It doesn't even have directional sword attacks for starters. I'm sure you've seen the various .webm posted. It's truly amazing how dumbed down it has become.
>>714862914 >>714862928
I know which makes it even worse. Switch 2 won't be emulated for a while and performance for its exclusives won't be better on PC, so PC fags have no ground to stand on anymore
>>714863121
Well, the performance of the more demanding games is ass on emulators anyway. It seems the only way Nintendo knows how to compete is by threatening people without money.
You clearly got annihilated here seconds before. You always post these bullshit zero-context webms of you wailing on a single enemy, which never ever happens.
It's funny that you're too fucking stupid to even realise we can see the red X lmao
>>714863645 >OOT >combat depth
You literally use the item the enemy is weak to, and cause there's only one or two enemies in the room who are static, it doesn't matter when you do it at all. You need to be completely retarded to think simon sez of time is deeper than the game where enemeis are acutally allowed to do something.
>>714863645 >>714863104
Of all things to criticize about BotW/TotK, the combat is the most asinine. It's like watching a house being on fire and leaving a bad review because "the color of the curtains didn't match the color of the washing machine in the basement."
It's not only ignoring the real issues, it's a nonsense argument to begin with.
>>714863880
I didn't make the .webm, but it ultimately proves my point. That even a brainless monkey playing these games mashing a single button STILL dies.
>>714863903
Sure, but...it was a game from 1998. Come on now. The enemy standing there stunlocked from a single attack certainly isn't better.
>>714863970 >Tamarind Glazed Skate Wing with Green Papaya Salad and spiced Pho Broth is $215 at Le Bernardin >"bro you can catch fish in the river for free!"
>HAHAHA I CAN PLAY NINTENDO GAMES ON MY DECK
to >I...IT DOESNT MATTER ITS RUNS LIKE SHIT
to >NINTENDO GAMES ARE SHIT ANYWAYS
to >I..I CAN PLAY THESE NINTENDO GAMES FOR FREEEEE
>>714864104
No it isn't. Considering there is a lot of combat in the games (unless you quite literally running past basically every enemy and chest), then att that point, you're basically playing a walking simulator.
>>714864261
No, it doesn't. Like the other guy just said, you can cheese the AI so easily. Plus I already told you I didn't even make it in the first place.
>>714864754 >The red X proves you died here
so what? anyone can reproduce that webm, you yourself have probably stunlocked big enemies the same way. what difference does it make if he died and how is that "getting filtered"?
>>714864754
That's not my post by the way. It's okay. I know the truth is really hard to cope with, but you just have to deal with it. We call that life.
>>714864891 >>714865026
It's over bro. You humiliated yourself. Spamming more zero context webms won't save you. I will constantly remind everyone in this thread of your humiliation. Might as well close the tab and go play your beloved Terraria.
>>714865890 >bloodstains in souls games show where OTHERS died.
no? bloodstains in souls games serve both purposes. you drop a stain when you die and need to pick it back up to get your souls and likewise other players also drop stains to show how they died
>>714863970
You don't need to buy the upgrade patch in order for the game to already be massively improved.
The patch is mostly for the resolution and the new memories.