>>714942120 (OP)
>why doesn't blizzard try to give people boners anymore?
Male boners are illegal. On one hand, imposing the constriction of sexuality leads to productivity but on the other hand women have no need for productivity anymore, because they're productive themselves, so there's no need for male productivity anymore, therefore you can constrict sexuality all you want, it won't have the same results it had in the past.
All of the above goes without mentioning the fact that female sexuality is never restricted in any way, except when it comes to intrasexual female competition, meaning women police other, more attractive women out of self interest and not related to any issues they'd have with the lack of morality of other women.
When you stuff your corporation full of women, they do not leave their interests, instincts, sexual insecurities and whims at the door, they bring them along. Therefore you can expect that when a corporation becomes more and more female, it necessarily becomes less and less male, because male sexuality is seen as predatory by women and thus society at large.
What happens next is that players(who are mostly male) leave, and your profits go down, this is inescapable once enough women are hired, because women cannot understand male wants and needs, they can only understand status, and video games inherently have nothing to do with status and thus are seen as an inferior way of wasting time because men who play video games are preoccupied with their own enjoyment instead of being preoccupied with women and women's needs, such as money, status and power. Their inborn solipsism doesn't allow them to even begin to want to understand men(save for mothers who have sons and thus have a genetic interest to understand their needs), which is why when you hire women, the male oriented product bombs and loses its appeal to the main male audience. It is what it is.
