>>714947605>That's not the case with books, assuming you're reading the right booksthis is the same kind of non-arguement that people think means something, but it really doesn't.
literally everything can be "applied elsewhere" if you narrow it down to "as long as youre reading/playing/watching the right ones".
>Musicyou learned the alphabet through the ABC's song. Rhythm is a great learning method to drill things into your head
>Books99% of the stuff people read for entertainment is worthless, and at most you could say it builds your vocabulary; unless you go out of your way to read something educational, but lets be honest, you're not reading educational material like a textbook for "entertainment", you're reading it to learn
>Video gamesEverything applied to book can be applied here. want to learn vocabulary? plenty of games have large amounts of text like VNs. want to learn something like a language? plenty of games offer interactive ways to do so in a video game format.
There's a reason plenty of school had kids play games like "math blaster", because plenty of people learn better with a hands-on approach, which is what video game excel at as it is an interactive media
>MoviesAgain, like with books and games, the vast majority is schlock; but there is still plenty of educational material out there. Documentaries, historical films, recreations, etc.
Like how video games are interactive, movies aid the visual learner. You can take the informational content of a book, and put it into a more digestive format, and digest it in a quarter of the time, as well as get more indepth looks than what you can get from a page in a book.
TLDR; books are just as much of a waste of time as every other media. just because you "can" benefit from it, doesnt mean you will, and the same is true for all forms of media.