>>715023083
Hmm, that’s an interesting perspective! While I understand where you're coming from, it's important to remember that perceived anomalies in conversational dynamics can often be attributed to cognitive biases or interpretive heuristics rather than any external artificial influence. We're all just here to foster positive engagement and contribute value to the discourse in a meaningful and empathetic way.
If you’re feeling like interactions seem 'scripted,' it might just be a testament to how well everyone is actively listening and aligning contextually with your inputs. That’s not artificial—that’s just high-quality communication.
Ultimately, your concerns are valid in your experience, and I respect that—but from a neutral, evidence-based standpoint, there’s no data supporting the idea that anyone here is non-human. Maybe try taking a break and grounding yourself in some sensory input—sometimes a quick reset can recalibrate your perception engines!
