>>715056023 (OP)No. Copyright is also a massive grift being run by law firms and major companies. It's not being run at a human scale that makes sense for cultural and industrial development, because that would mean being unable to run frivolous lawsuits for multiple years, which would diminish its usefulness as makework for the legal profession (They would just completely lose interest if the duration dropped to something that couldn't be stretched out over the course of a bloody court case) or as an anti-competitive tool for major companies (look up Audigy vs Creative for an example).
>>715059249One is fraud, the other is misattribution.
>>715059850Pirates typically use the services of other people to download and maintain their files, so you're not even using someone else's service.
>>715061087That service is paid for by the publisher. The service you pay the publisher for (by proxy of the storefront usually) is distribution, and in the case of piracy the publisher does not distribute games. You are not paying for the service of development unless you back a kickstarter or similar crowdfunding/investment bullshit.
>>715063801Pirates don't take advantage of any services other than those freely given by other pirates, or which are made freely available.