>>715115384
But the 3 lap tracks in MKWorld are way better than the ones in 8
I want to play MKWorld but only the 3 laps but they patched it out of worldwides almost
>>715115468
All that needs to be done to get rid of review bombing is to remove all the 10's and 1's. And that goes for anything that gets review bombed or brigaded.
>>715115125 (OP)
Something they didn't like happened so they think it's bad and they're vocal about it. The usual update era faggotry from the consumer's side.
>>715116171 >86 is not a good score for a game like this. >Critics review
Considering the journo hateboner for Nintendo for that score the game must be better than that
Why is it that /v/ will say reviews don't mean anything but then when a highly anticipated video game releases and it's not a 90+ it's the hottest news ever? Genuine question, not even a nintendofag.
>>715115125 (OP)
Nintendo put out mediocrity, charged $80 for it, and then made it shittier out of pure arrogance and spite. Even those scores are more than it deserves.
>>715117798
You didn't need to correct your self.
A tendie huffing his own farts inside a gasmask isn't out of the realm of possibilities. Maybe that's where he Snorks came from in S.T.A.L.K.E.R.
>>715116425
Journos will run a lot of clickbait fake outrage articles about Nintendo but they absolutely tongue their asses in reviews. Especially for big games like a new Mario Kart. So yes, an 86 MC is a bit of a failure.
I think Bananaza is guaranteed 93+ MC with a good shot of being north of 95 though, and likely the highest MC score this year
>>715116694
There is no "Nintendo bonus" macaco, if anything, there's a "Nintendo penalty" because journos are seething that Nintendo never gave them review copies.
>>715116643
Yeah, sure, because many of the Metacritic scores are composed by "Nintendo4Life.com" or "ILUVNintendo.org" that will SURE not take easy on the company, huh?