PC bros will spend thousands on a GPU and then play on a shitty office monitor instead of a 4k tv

>>715175164 (OP)
Delay

Detachable penis

Latency on a shitty monitor is better than latency on a 1k television.

>>715175164 (OP)
4k is a meme and TVs are terrible for video games

>>715175164 (OP)
my 4080 machine is hooked up to a 80 inch 1080p TV from 2013

tfpd

>high latency
>low refresh rate
Retard

Yes I have a $2000 PC
Yes I mostly play gacha games

>>715175164 (OP)
A TV's dimensions obscure your view for FPS games. Even being on a 32 inch screen like i am is considered pushing it in regards to the point of where too much screen real estate is going to effect my spotting negatively.

>>715175164 (OP)
I'm not PC master race by any means, I have like 15 consoles and just a gaming laptop. I have a 4k tv but it and my laptops's HDMI port don't seem to get along because, despite my tv being 120 hz, it never seems to be able to display what my laptop' running above like a choppy 60ish despite said laptop running the game at 90-120 natively.

>>715175164 (OP)
I have a 144 hz big tv/monitor kek

>>715175164 (OP)
>console nigger
>frog poster
>absolutely fucking retarded
Checks out

you will have to pry my 1080 255hz monitor from my cold dead hands

>>715175164 (OP)
Even 2k monitors are more expensive than your average 4k tv monitors cause latency and refresh rate

>>715175317
4k nigga

frogposter will not buy things because he has no money and then complain about people spending their money (that they have)

>>715176103
You claim to have money yet you play on a 1080@60 office display in your favela. Curious

>>715176103
i think the point is that wagies try to keep up with the joneses and keep "upgrading" their shit when in fact stuff a tenth of the price is sometimes superior if not atleast equal

>>715175164 (OP)
i have a 4090 and an lg c2 65in and i play everything in 4k 120hz. never going back to a monitor the size of my tablet. that would be insane

>frog poster OP
check
>absolutely no opinion, just shitty no-penis comment
check
>op is huge cocksucker and faggot
check
>4K TV
LMAO,
even ROFLAMAO
I have decent 4k tv, that emulates 60fps into something that looks like 120fps, also have good hdr, but let's be real, it's not near my 165Hz monita, with non to 0 input lag, when i need to relax and WATCH video game, i have "playing", i turn on tv, but when i want to dive into game in 90+fps i just sit in front of my monita.

>>715175605
Too poor for display?

>discord console trannies spam shitty threads because they have no game

>>715175887
>Even 2k monitors are more expensive than your average 4k tv monitors cause latency and refresh rate
But latency and refresh rate are really that important in gaming?

If you are a competitive fag then you don't need a thousand dollar late gen GPU and also probably you don't even play at 2k but 1080p with the textures on low.

>>715175164 (OP)
>PC bros will spend thousands on a GPU and then play on a shitty office monitor instead of a 4k tv
I play on a 4K OLED 240Hz monitor.

>>715177609
How can you play 4k with 120 frames on a 4090? doom the darkages runs at 45 fps, expexition 33 at 55fps and stellar blade at 90 fps. what games run at 120 fps? I have to breake out 5 year old games or use may god forgive me dlls performance to get decent frames and at that point why even have 4k

antialiasing makes resolutions above 2k a waste of frames.

>>715181152
Same.

>>715175821
You needa hdmi 1.4 cable or above and most "older" tv inputs are capt at 60 frames

>>715181807
Massive cope.

>>715175164 (OP)
if i had my own house then maybe i would hook up my PC to my TV

>>715181697
>or use may god forgive me dlls performance to get decent frames and at that point why even have 4k
Why not use DLSS performance at 4K? The only 4K users who don't use DLSS when it's offered are either people with 5090s that can run DLAA, those who play old games that don't support it, or people who play on 60 inch TVs because that's how big you need to go to start noticing flaws of DLSS at 4K.

>>715175164 (OP)
My monitor probably costs more than your shitty TV.

>>715182910
Because of the artefacts around all moving objects and at performance mode 1440p looks clearer than 4k. If dlls goes lower than quality aka 75 percent resolution it looks worse than a lower resolution setting with higher dlls quality.

>>715183759
>Because of the artefacts around all moving objects and at performance mode 1440p looks clearer than 4k.
No idea what you are talking about here. 4K DLSS Performance looks clearer than any 1440p, clearer than 1440p DLAA as well. I think you've just never used DLSS at 4K, there's a reason it's shilled with that resolution in mind.