>>715518174 >175cm >I-if I use cm the difference doesn't seem that big, it's a big number so it make me feel big and not a manlet
You are 5'7"
175cm is a nothing number for height, just a vague value that means nothing to most of the world to try and hide your real height and make it seem not that big of a deal.
>>715518114 (OP)
The maximum height a woman can grow to without gigantism (around 220cm if I'm not mistaken) still isn't "too tall." In fact it isn't tall enough.
>>715521150
A foot being 30cm doesn't even make sense as an "approximation of body parts" because there's no way whichever foot they measured was that big.
Sexual roleplay with AK-15 in which she tries mommydom but she fumbles at every occasion which only frustrates her more and then comes to a boiling point where she takes her frustrations out on you and her real dommy side comes out.
>>715521576
What bizarre part of the EU are you from that you use feet and inches for height? Older people in the UK do that but they also have their own shoe sizes
>>715518114 (OP)
Once you start going over 4 and if your real brave 5 meters things start getting too unreasonable for the logistics of sex to happen, and I'm here to have sex with big women