>>715590154
First there's the design. It's plain ol' ugly.
Second, there's a lot of menus and none of them give any indication about which one will actually make the change that you want. If that's not enough, it doesn't give you much information about the change will actually do unless you're already knowledgeable about what it does. Not exactly a problem, but brutal against new users.
IF THAT'S NOT ENOUGH.
Third! You think making changes in the configuration files would be easier, so you won't have to navigate through all their gorillions of menus, but there's gorillions of configuration files, and none of them seem to be the right one that makes the change.
This is further compounded when some changes in the options can't be made at all because they're greyed out and require being changed in the configuration files, but since there's a bajiligorillion of the god damn fucking configuration files, you have launch and close and relaunch repeat bajiligorillimillivanillion times to see if it did what you fucking wanted!
NOW!
I WILL admit, that this is ONLY if you want to make changes to the controls or visual aspects of what is being emulated. If you want to use the original controller and settings for let's say a PS1 game, Retroarch is pretty great for that. For everybody else, it's a god awful nightmare. I've had less of a headache using PCSX2 than Retroarch, and that's saying something.