>>715612775 (OP)>>715612845Without the Nintendo bonus it's only an 80/100.
>>715612845>team that has nothing but 93/100 or higher games>only a 90 several hours before all the reviews are in>will inevitably go down, as does every score once all the reviews are in>for the flagship singleplayer game for a brand new consoleYeah it's kinda bad.
>>715612775 (OP)oh no!! the scores!! the ever important scores!!
metacritic the holy grail of scorers
dont forget to score today too, if you dont pay attention to the scores the game will 100% suck
what are you doing not scoring? give me more scores oh yes, YESSS
>>715612775 (OP)Nintendo stock is in freefall because of this underwhelming Metascore. Shareholders were couting on at leats a 97.
Does Nintendo blackmail reviewers?
>>715614970>Does Nintendo black male reviewers?No, that's Sony.
>>715614970Yes, and also bribes.
>>715614970No, it's Sony, Astrobot has 94 score
>worse than E33
Damn it must really be shit
>>715615523Your logic is this:
>non-nintendo game has a high scorePaid reviews
>non-nintendo game has a low scoreLol, game suxx.
>nintendo game doesn't have a high scoreDoesn't have trannies in it, victim of the woke agenda.
>nintendo game has a high scoreCompletely legit reviews, not paid for, GOAT.
>>715614970>>715615523Both do, it's called access journalism and if you don't give them good scores then they won't send you review copies in the future.
E33 mandate journos are lowering the score on purpose
looking like yet another nintendo goty
>>715612913Without the anti donkey kong bias, it's a 97/100
>reviewers saying it's about 20 hours
$70 sounds like a bit much.
>>715612913another ported meme that used to be called "Sony Bonus". That's really the only thing you can ever post.
>>715616351How much is it when you subtract all the time just spend just hitting rocks
>>715614970Sony does, but people have bias for Nintendo franchises. Both aren't really genuine scores.
>>715616040Also to add onto this, there's a recent trend where companies aren't sending people that gave negative previews review copies either. That's why you see games like Veilguard release with high metacritic scores that then tank once normal reviewers that weren't hand selected get their hands on the game. Metacritic itself is just something to metagame by these companies now, they will purposefully try to inflate their scores(and often that's because some companies like Sony will pay out a bonus to the devs if a game hits a certain metacritic threshold).
>>715612775 (OP)>>715613164DELETE THESE
I'M FUCKING WARNING YOU
IT'S 95 AND GOTY YOU BETTER FUCKING DELETE THESE
>>715615523Tendiepedo gonna cry?
>>715612775 (OP)>runs like shit and has braindead gameplay that you have to struggle to die>90Nintendo bonus is real
>>715612775 (OP)Antisemitic game
>>715614553Astro Bot is at 94 tendie pedo
>>715615704When did I say non-Nintendo, assface? I'm just talking about Sony. Did you forget the lickbooting narrative last year of Sony being back at making AAA game? Everyone glazed about Astrobot while Bananza will probably outsold that shit in 2 months. Goes to show how journalists are irrelevant nowadays
>>715619042 Bananza will probably outsold that shit in 2 months.
holy esl
>>715612775 (OP)So the Switch 2 still does not have any games.
>>715616480about the length of an Elden Ring playthrough once you've removed the rolling
>>715619147shovelware machine
>>715619060Why? Death Stranding 2 has a higher score
>>715618479Gamespot gave Bananza an 8/10 too. Does Gamespot just hate DK games? I didn't like DK until like 2 years ago once I binged all the games, and I don't see how it's possible to dislike Tropical Freeze unless you just hate 2D platformers
>>715612775 (OP)BRVTAL MOGGING
Why can't Nintendo make single player kino like Sony?
/v/ is going to be fucking insufferable for the next few days isn't it? Considering the sheer amount of shitposting leading up.
>>715619413Don't hate them, but I'd sooner replay DKC1 than TF or any of the others if I got the itch, which I haven't in years.
Congrats, the access media gave a first party title a good score.
Enjoy the 2nd game on your paperweight.
I'm happy for you.
>>715619413Outside of Mario and mainline zelda, gamejournos don't need excuse to shit on nintendo games
Splatoon was 80 total and second game was 83, despite being great
Expedition 33 blowing the competition for GOTY out of the water
toycon2
md5: e0e0085551fd249e69283b32029b2d68
🔍
>>715620026It was made by a single conjoined french baby with downs syndrome too, such an inspiring story about the game's development.
DKneel
md5: 2ebf744a012ee129befdfa9059e59ee9
🔍
>>715612775 (OP)Have we really gotten to the point where a 90 is considered a bad score?
>>715620782When it's only the second game for the Switch 2 and the first one that isn't a spinoff, yeah, being almost a full grade letter below the Switch's first prestige title is pretty bad.
>>715620685Mwaaa... the french!
Today Nintendo won.
Doesn't matter what any you fucks say.
Microsoft and Sony would've casted the troon instead.
Despite their flaws, Nintendo still can differentiate between a man and a woman.
>>715620685People will not care at the end of the year.
>>715621037More like total tendie meltdown. They have been pissing and crying ever since the game reviewed lower than expedition 33
>>715612775 (OP)kek, nothing makes me chuckle more than seeing /v/ get BTFO'd.
>>715621332if you can't tell that's a falseflag, you already lost
>>715621361Do not ever say /v/ is a tendie board, we are a PC chad board that has to sadly share it will a small vocal minority of mentally ill tendies that samefag dozens of threads
>>715612845they're admitting most nintendo games are a 10, that's why a 90 is "bad" to them
>>715621584but most nintendo games are 7
seph
md5: 48005eda96930da5870974b7edfd7397
🔍
>>715621472>tendies changing history againfunny thing is, i remember thousands of posts of people calling BG3 game of the year and one of the greatest games ever all while TOTK was forgotten in a few weeks and was listed as fans as the weakest 3D zelda game
you gonna change history and pretend everyone thinks DK is GOTY despite the massive praise E33 is getting as a masterpiece?
>>715621332>>715620920>>715620762>>715620685Total **** meltdown.
BTW, your other seethe thread got deleted after defended it for 10 hours ;(
>>715621472>Identifying with platform warringYou're a fag, and like I said, I like seeing you faggots get BTFO'd.
>Arguing about 2-3% ratings
Anything over 75 is a good game and anything above 90 is great, you're all splitting hairs at this point
>a Nintendo equivalent 80%
Grim
>>715621242Now type this again without tears in your eyes lmao
>>715622683Tell that to the faggot thinking that Bananza is a TORtanic.
>>715621037anon look up which film company is making that movie.
1
md5: 9e9df0fdc84e5749e198f4671cd7f1b1
🔍
>>715612775 (OP)Grim, dark and mature Donkey Kong is back! At least sometimes. What are the excuses now?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRX0Ep7gacQ
>>715612775 (OP)>Worse than E33Lmfaooooo
>>715623091I'm not a newfag so I know people won't give a shit
grim. another nintenflop.
>>715622683The problem is that Asstroturf and Expedition Turdy-Tree are genuinely bad games who deserve a 70 metacritic rating at most. One is a shallow copycat of superior nintendo games and recieved game of the year, its rip-off gimmicks being praised shamelessly as "inventive". The other is a boring, broken, soulless knock-off of JRPGs that only got praised because it was a way to attack the japanese industry.
Those of us who know how this corrupt industry works, knew already beforehand, before much was known about Bananza, that it would get lower review scores simply for being on switch 2. Journos are riding on the hate train and there is now much pressure on them from Sony to give nintendo games lower scores, unlike with switch 1 launch games like super mario odyssey where Sony was just not taking the switch seriously thinking it would flop. Now that nintendo has launched a new console after the colossal success of the switch, they are in total war mode to burry the switch 2.
>>715612775 (OP)Without the Nintendo tax, we're looking at 98
>>715623917It's the switch 2 tax, unironically. Those of us who have been alive long enough know how this industry works and knew long in advance, as soon as it was decided that the switch 2 was the new-coming of Satan, that all its games would be downscored no matter what.
>>715623874>Asstroturf>Expedition Turdy-TreeYou make good points but I can't take you seriously. You probably unironically call Trump "Drumpf."
>>715620685King of RPG...I kneel
Reminder this game plays like shit docked, and that the only way to get halfway decent performance is in handheld mode with that absolute dogshit LCD screen with washed out blacks and smeary pixel transitions.
The absolute geniuses at Nintendo decided handheld should have higher CPU clock speed.
>>715624423I call him Zognald Blumpf, actually.
E33 is an industry plant.
>>715624759LMAO it's a fucking joke honestly
>>715624759You are a fucking worthless retard at making images. Why is the one on top fucking huge for no reason? Why are they looping back around?
Just make fucking two columns, E33 on left, DK Bananaza on right with the same site on each row. How fucking incompetent can you be
>>715624982Did this in 2 minutes. Didn't feel like putting more effort in. Just like the lazy E33 mandate journalist
>>715625073>2 minutes for thatyou should feel bad
will sonyjeets ever get over their nintendo derangement syndrome or are we seriously going to get daily threads about metacritic scores, twitch views and dorito awards as a coping mechanism while switch 2 keeps beating sales records
Nintendo with another GOAT game. E33 is shit, DS2 is just a sequel. they might win GOTY this year despite the media hate
>>715624759>E33 is an industry plant.No, but the tranny/tankie Twitter hivemind of which most journos are part of has ordained that Nintendo is bad, so they have to hate them now
>>715624759That's SO blatant lol.
>>715623470saving this post for when it wins goty, and I don't even like, you are just completely unable to read the room
>>715616480do you subtract all walking time in videogames?
>>715619413they just don't hand out the nintendo bonus
>>715619413>GamespotGets an average of 12k views per video, fewer than 100 visits per webpage, and absolutely no profit from viewership. Three months ago they laid off the staff of their only video series to regularly crack 100k viewers, their "[expert in IRL field] reacts to thing in Hit Game" series, to focus more on 5k view puff pieces claiming the next asscreed is going to be a genre redefining hit. This operation requires capital to function, so clearly they are making money from something, and clearly it isnt their audience. Therefore the only logical assumption is that their costs are being underlined by the companies they advertise for.
>>715619413It's a 9/10 if you actually go to the website must be a error on Metacritic
>>715612913western journos HATE nintendo so its actually a 98 without the nintendo penalty
>>715614970>>715616040nintendo literally doesn't any more
journocucks were literally crying that they had to go out and buy their own consoles and games because nintendo didn't give them any free shit
>>715624759E33 has a slightly higher metacritic score.. even if it had exactly the same as DK Bananza, you'd expect roughly half of reviewers to rate it higher and half lower... that's just common sense statistics.
What exactly are you trying to prove here brainlet?
>>715619413>Gamespot gave Bananza an 8/10 toono?
>>715626176The point is that Expedition Turdy-Tree pushers "happen" to be the same people who gave Bananza low scores.
>>715626162That's because the Switch 2 doesn't have backwards compatibility until you install a Day 1 update and Nintendo didn't want that to negatively impact early reviews. They're still sending games out to be reviewed early, which is why there's any reviews at all before release.
They also flew journalists out to demo MKW under their supervision.
>>715626476No you fucking retarded subhuman, you could cherry pick 40 reviews higher and 40 reviews lower for both. Your fucking 8 cherrypicked reviews doesn't prove anything you fucking retard.
It's like you're a really smoothbrain moron who can't understand basic concepts.
>>715626649I did not make that image, I was just responding to your post. There is no evidence that he cherry-picked.
>>715612775 (OP)not paying $80 for a game
games should go down in price due to inflation, not up. going up = benefitting the company only
>>715626904>games should go down in price due to inflationThis is why nobody respects "gamers" and their online community.
>>715612775 (OP)What? Is the joke that the game was supposed to be dogshit, and that it's instead critically acclaimed? I don't get it.
>>715626904That's good because it's $70 so pay up
>>715627057snoys are just deranged and are accustomed to nintendo games being all masterpieces that get 98-99 scores than a 91 is a "big win" for them
>>715612913You are mad. I am glad that you are mad.
>>715626775You may not be him, but you are one stupid motherfucker nonetheless.
If two games get the same Metacritic score, then you can expect about half of reviewers to have given a higher score to game A, and half of reviewers to have given a higher score to game B (ignoring critics that gave the same score to both). Considering these games have like 100 reviewers, tons of them overlapping, that's like at least 30 examples of reviewers who gave higher to A and 30 examples of reviewers who gave higher score to B.
Except in this example, E33 actually got even a *higher* Metacritic score than Bananza, so that 50% is probably closer to 60% who gave higher scores to E33, since the overall is higher for that game.
So no, 8 cherrypicked reviews where a reviewer gave the higher score to the game with the higher overall Metacritic score is not some revelation. You and him are both fucking smoothbrained sub 80 IQ morons. I have to explain this like it's to a 3rd grader. You are one dumb motherfucker.
>>715627378You have zero evidence for him cherry-picking. It's an a priori you have. He simply posted about a pattern he noticed and decided to use an image to illustrate his opinion. Of course he is not going to make a full statistical breakdown of the games' reviews just to score a point in an online discussion with some neckbeard. You are an absolute midwit.
>>715612775 (OP)Was honestly expecting more. It's obvious that critics hate Donkey Kong
>>715626649I don't see how it's cherry picking. All of the lowest reviews that happen to make Donkey Kong overall meta score a low 90's just so happen to be from reviewers that gave E33 a 10/10 or a 9. Which gives it just enough of a nudge to keep it at a higher score.
>>715627887Why does Death Stranding have substantially more reviews than Expedition 33 and Donkey Kong almost already has more reviews as well?
>>715627836It's been obvious that the game would be downscored by critics the moment that it was clear that the switch 2 was the new designated punching bag for the sheep.
>>715627836Nah, there's a mandate in place in the West to make sure nothing substantially out reviews E33 this year. Sony and Microsoft are in full damage control over the Switch 2 as well.
>>715612775 (OP)>bing bing wahoo cultists like bing bing wahoo slopwowzers
Why do trannies keep saying the game costs $80 when it costs as much as any other AAA game?
>>715628163Personally, I believe that Sony is behind the paid low-score reviews of the game. I'm looking up the outlets who gave it an 8/10 and there is a suspicious pattern of 10/10 scores for Death Stranding, the year's boring snoy astroturf that nobody likes. Looking more into it and will compile it once I have more data from other games as well.
>>715628539sony cultists like to spread fake news
>>715628539It's not ok when nintendo does it
>>715618479>donky kong game not msde by rare>dumb niggers literally can't figure out why the game is so soullessLmao
>>715628539mario kart world is $80 so they think all switch 2 games cost $80
they are very stupid
>>715627696Holy fuck, you are stupid. He already fucking admitted he grabbed from the bottom of the reviews for Bananza you absolute moron. So clearly cherrypicking games that are below the average Metacritic for one random review, are going to trend towards the average for another random review (especially since the average is *higher* for E33).
Even just taking reviews at complete random, a game with a higher Metacritic score is going to have a 60-70% chance that any review taken at random is equal or higher than the lower rated game. So no, 8 fucking cherrypicked reviews from the bottom of the list, out of 100 does not suggest some industry-wide bias, you fucking retard.
I did the same fucking thing as him, except the other way around, and literally I went through 10 fucking reviews straight that either had lower or the same score for E33 and Bananza,
Eurogamer Portugal, Digital Trends, Siliconera, gameblog.fr, Gamingbible, Eurogamer Poland, Spazio Games, Washington Post all gave E33 lower scores and Bananza higher scores. I did the same fucking thing as him, grabbed from the bottom of the list. I didn't name the two that gave the same score or outlets that didn't review both games.
See fucking easy it is to manipulate you smoothbrain retards who have zero critical thinking skills?
>>715627887See above you stupid fuck.
Cherrypicking the same way he did (starting from the bottom of the reviews and looking at their review for the other game), yields 10 FUCKING CONSECUTIVE REVIEWS that gave lower or the same score to E33 compared to Bananza, despite E33 have a 3-point higher overall Metacritic score.
>>715627836They still have PTSD from getting filtered by dong freeze
>>715612775 (OP)>reviews bought for heckin do odyssey: cunny edition And this is a surprise how?
inb4
>ISN'T IT POSSIBLE IT'S A GUD GAME!?!sure, it's possible. But considering how Nintendo has been conducting themselves since S1, and has and will only get worse with time, I imagine it will do a great job of getting your attention, but there won't be anything remarkable about it. Certainly not 9/10 remarkable, bump or not
>>715629157you're a tranny nigger that things twilight princess was good. your opinion is irrelevant
>>715627696>what is regression to the meanstupid fucking retard. He deliberately picked the lowest reviews from Bananza
>>715628828>He already fucking admitted he grabbed from the bottom of the reviews for BananzaThat's the entire point, dummy. You don't know what cherry-picking means, you sub-120 IQ wordcel faggot.
>I did the same fucking thing as him, except the other way aroundGood, I am currently doing it for Death Stranding 2. I am very suspicious about the promotion of that game and suspect that sony is the force behind low switch 2 reviews.
>>715629157Never played tp. Only bothered with alttp and wind waker. Better luck next time
>>715629362>the entire point is cherrypicking>even though I just said it wasn't cherrypicking>and doing the exact same thing for E33 yields 10 straight reviewers that gave higher or same reviews to Bananza compared to their E33 reviews, despite E33 being the overall higher-rated gameYou are one stupid motherfucker.
How in God's name is Odyssey a 97 but this one is barely a 90? This looks way more engaging and new than Odyssey did. Something is sus.
>>715629263>what is regression to the meanLooking at DS2 scores from outlets who gave Banaza a low score, it seems more like regression above the mean. I will do a full breakdown comparison using games like astrobought as well as they are in the same genre.
>>715629584Indeed. Expect more switch 2 games to get low scores for no reason.
file
md5: 0d437d3f7f5ce5eceb21ad2b19099ffc
🔍
>>715612775 (OP)We did it DK64 bros
>>715614970They send the Yakuza to the homes of the reviewers
>>715614970everyone does to some extent. You'd have to be a business retard not to actively try to get good reviews somehow since it's an effective form of marketing
>>715614970Sony literally does this and also buys GOTYs. For Astrobot they had already bought the GOTY for Concord but since it bombed they just transferred to Astrobot LMAO.
is donkey kong banana fun
what a fucking flop man
take away the nintendo boost and this becomes a 7.5 at most, don't know how the odyssey team screwed up this bad
>>715629690But DK64 is shit. If that's 90, M64 is 160.
>>715621353Ah yes, the Nintendo bonus. Journalism is extremely biased against Nintendo for the past few years, but the catch is that people don't give a shit about game urinalists anymore.
>>715629584>>715629673I think it was because it was the first new Mario game that went back to the Sunshine/ 64 design and was also the first Mario game on the Switch, which everybody was high off of in 2017.
>>715629584One of them has Mario in the title and the other doesn't.
>>715629602Retardation speaks
>>715629584Mario Odyssey didn't deserve a 97 to begin and it's not a bad thing that they adjust their compass for newer titles.
That being said this game does look way fucking better than Mario Odyssey and a lot of people seem to agree so there's that.
>>715629576Again, you don't know what cherry-picking means. His point was that outlets which gave Bananza low scores, gave Expedition 33 (a laughably bad game) very high scores. Sure, there's different explanations for that, but it has nothing to do with cherry-picking. Cherry-picking is when you ignore single elements of a dataset in your analysis, he did not, he took all the low-scoring reviewers, i.e. the entire dataset relevant to his claim. Whether his conclusion is right or wrong changes nothing about this fact. Now, fuck off, you pretentious neckbeard faggot.
>>715629602Just like you'd find if you did the opposite and looked at low DS2 reviews. Almost like reviewers have different preferences.
>>715630074Cope. The bias is quite obvious to pattern-noticing chads. I will do a full statistical breakdown soon.
>>715630213>Almost like reviewers have different preferences*biases
And I am doing it, we'll see the results.
>>715629871you have shit taste
>>715629584Snoy is keeping them from having a highly reviewed game that's looked at as true system seller.
Nu-Donkey Kong is trans-coded
>>715630097>Mario Odyssey didn't deserve a 97 to beginFuck off. It's probably the best 3D Mario game to date
>>715629871DK64 is actually based and people only hated it because they were arbitrarily done with collectathons and were looking for excuses.
>>715627836Anyone remember the trend around 2008 for journos to bash DKC as one of the most overrated games of all time? A lot of them just don't like the series for whatever reason.
>>715630504There are other Mario games that universally loved so they would already be better. 64 and Galaxy are impossible to beat.
>>715630431He does look like your average trans woman.
>>715630608DK still reminds game urinalists of their wife's Bull
I'm still buying DK Bananza.
80 (before Nintendo bonus) IS A GOOD SCORE!!
>>715612775 (OP)>Tiny open world levels that don't connect to one another>Terrain is not diggable or buildable like Minecraft despite being voxel base>Collectathon gameplay that everyone hated in Assassins Creed and other Ubislop gamesIt should be a 70/100.
>anything below 120/100 despite nintendo review boost
It is shit
>>715629584DK has been in spinoff hell for so long that he’s now seen as a minor Mario character instead of as a staple Nintendo series.
>>715612775 (OP)>only 90 even with nintendo bonus embarrassing
>>71561648020 hours probably is that time.
>>715612775 (OP)The anti donkey kong bias is real. If it was Mario instead of Donkey Kong it would be over 95
Without the Nintendo bonus cope snoys would have already killed themselves, imagine the company you hate constantly making the best games in the industry according to everyone while you literally have no exclusives anymore.
Miyamoto is gonna go fucking ballistic. Five years of wasted dev time that could have been spent on a 3D Mario just to release this wet fart of a 4 hour gimmick game.
>>715631294In reality it's their walking sim slop that's the most overrated garbage in the entire industry.
>>715630110Deliberately choosing the lowest outliers of the first set, which, even in a totally random set, would be much higher in the second set on average due to regression to the mean, except it's further aggravated by the fact that E33's Metacritic average is 3 points higher than DK Bananza's to begin with, while also ignoring any scores that don't fit his agenda, and also not doing the opposite test with E33's low scores, which, as shown, yielded 10 (TEN) consecutive reviews in which the DK Bananza score was the same or higher (again, despite an overall lower Metacritic score for DK Bananza).
Yes, that is absolutely 100% without a doubt cherry-picking, it's also gross misunderstanding of statistic and data sets.
>>715630110cherry-picking is when you pick specific parts of the data that support your argument, which he did by choosing the lowest scores for Bananza, which would naturally be higher for E33 just due to regression to the mean, even in a totally random set.
Now we are going to argue that a dice roll is biased against Nintendo? Are you retarded?
>>715612775 (OP)It's Nintendo's best game since TotK.
>>715630929>Open world levels
>all these conspiracies about journalists being out to get Nintendo whenever they're given any treatment below declaring a game to be Game of the Generation
>>715631970damn chat we are cooked
>>715612775 (OP)>up to eight years in developmentTell me this will get a Switch port too.
>>715631847>>715631714you don't know what regression to the mean means and are using it wrong, please stop embarassing yourself.
>>715630320Just like how there is a huge bias against Nintendo and all the reviewers who rated Bananza low hate Nintendo and love E33!! oh no!!!....
oh wait, it's the exact same result when you do the opposite and look at E33's low reviews and see that 10 consecutive of the lowest reviews for E33 gave Bananza a higher score.
Insane how easy it is to manipulate retards.
>>715612775 (OP)Lower than expected. Must be mid.
>>715616351Yikes. That's really short.
>>715631714>Yes, that is absolutely 100% without a doubt cherry-pickingNope. You could argue that the comparison is statistically invalid, but cherry-picking implies bias or intentional omission. He did not cherry-pick, he took all the data that was relevant to his assertion that reviewers who gave low scores to Bananza gave high scores to E33. His assertion might not prove bias against Bananza specifically, but it is supported by the data he picked.
>>715631847see above.
>>715632174I honestly thought the game looked a bit weird and was betting on mid/low 80s. A Donkey Kong game will never get Mario scores because of bias.
>>715632093Nope, it's the same concept, actually it's even in tendie's favor since E33 has a higher metacritic score so naturally the scores will be higher (and thus "LE ANTI-NINTENDO BIAS!!!!" will look larger).
If 100 students take two tests where they guess on every single question, if you took a student that scored in the bottom 10th percentile for the first test, it's extremely likely that he will have scored higher on the second test. That's literally what we're looking at here, except the second test even had a few freebie answers that made the average higher than the first test.
>>715616351I would never play a platformer that's 50 hours long, that sounds like an insane slog.
>>715632632E33 is trash so it having a score above 80 is proof that sony is paying reviewers.
>>715612775 (OP)>more than söy standing 2Explain yourselves snoytrannies lmao
>>715632626I thought many decided this was just a re-skinned Super Mario Odyssey.
>>715632626It's by the Mario team so I'd expect it get Mario numbers just because the game is odyssey + destruction.
>>715632926I guess you go to different mid size open stages and collect golden bananas (moons) like in Odyssey. But isn't this just the formula of Mario 64/DK64/Banjo?
>>715624759OK but other reviewers have the opposite, like IGN, they gave E33 a 9 and DK a 10.
Idk what this image is suppose to prove, E33 meta is higher on average so you'll have a lot of reviewers that gave a better score to E33, that just basic math.
>>715632357>>715632626It's actually 5 and a half hours long apparently.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1wgdM0o9V3c
>>715632397>bias Like specifically picking the lowest reviews knowing those will favor your agenda due to regression to the mean?
>intentional omissionLike omitting doing the same fucking thing for E33's low reviews and comparing them and seeing that the same effect is happening in the opposite direction?
Again, even in a COMPLETE RANDOM SET, you will get a result like he got here. He's not proving anything, aside from his own stupidity.
>>715625390>tendies have a persecution complex>despite the fact that journos love Nintendo and give their reviews a nintendo bonus
Fucking yikes, so it's another ToTK-level disaster again. Well, that's disappointing.
>>715626285Weird. I'm only paying $60 for it.
>>715633226Oh yeah, look at this pro-Nintendo bias
>>715621353
>>715633226>>715621353The Nintendo bonus is a cope, this is reality.
>>715621037Both of these kids are too ugly for their roles, it's not the win you think it is.
>>715633154His point is the lowest DK reviews just so happen to be form outlets that gave E33 a 10/10 or a 9.
>journos don't hate Nintendo
>despite telling and linking people to ways to pirate their games before they even come out
>but they needed to damage control and stop all the tlou2 leaks the millisecond they popped up
Yeah, no bias whatsoever
>>715612845anon...
average scores are ~95-97
above average is 98-99
good is 100
anything until 95 is considered mediocre
>>715633432are you retarded?
E33 have a lot of 10/10, him finding a few case in a larger pool doesn't prove anything.
>>715633173How the fuck? Odyssey was like fifteen hours then you had a ton of after game extras.
>>715628663Nobody gives a shit when bad games get price hikes because nobody is gonna buy them regardless
>>715631989The funny part is that it’s the opposite way.
Nintendo forces journalists to give all their biggest games higher scores. If they don’t comply, Nintendo takes away their early access priviledges and could be sued.
>>715630431Are you going to post this evey thread? Its sad. Its also worse to think this way as those are primary boy/girl colors. It shows these freaks are just after children
>>715624759Ok, sell me on this. What benefit does the industry have in putting this on a pedestal?
>>715633637DK games are normally pretty short, aren't they?
>>715612845under 70 : unplayable garbage
70+ : trash
80+ : mid
90+ : decent
92+ : good
95+ : great
97+ : masterpiece
>>715633684>>715628663comparing nintengo games to TLoU is fucking insane lmao
like comparin an MLP comic book to the Illiad or the Odyssey
>>715633882nta but the west game industry loves attacking japanese games
>>715633980Try being a bit less obvious if you want to make snoys look bad.
>>715612913>Without the Nintendo bonus it's still a good gameOh, ok.
>>715634023Yeah pretty much this, the whole selling point of that game is
>omg JRPG without the cringey anime shit, I'm an adult what if someone walks in while I play!!!!!!!Being said by people who have never played a jrpg.
>>715630431cotton candy-coded
>>715612775 (OP)by now it's pretty clear metacritic is nintendo-owned
>>715633980>like comparin an MLP comic book to the Illiad or the OdysseyI agree. Nintendo games are timeless classics, beloved by millions decades after they come out. Snoy movies are shill-of-the-month astroturfed slop that is forgotten a few years after and nobody plays.
>>715633882It's a save face product that the west wants to use to boaster their claim that they're not making slop and getting slaughtered by the East. Just like Split Fiction and Blue Prince.
>>715634221>Nintendo blowing competition out of the water despite anti-nintendo bias.
>>715634221Metacritic doesn't do reviews anon.
>>715628663>>715633684Maybe the fact that TLOU Part 1 sold like shit is proof that it wasn't okay for Sony either. Not all disapproval for corporate moves have to be met with shitflinging threads on /v/, nigger.
>>715633980Ocarina of Time, Mario 64, Super Metroid, Metroid Prime, Mother 3, all are absolute timeless classic that are on a level Sony could never reach. TLOU Part 1 remastered remixed is an embarrassment.
>>715634302oorr
Maybe DK isn't that good? crazy I know.
K Rool being unvoiced kind of sucks.
>>715634354People are just tired to play the same game over and over again. Mario Kart World is a new game.
>>715634354>Maybe the fact that TLOU Part 1 sold like shit is proof that it wasn't okay for Sony eitherIt sold like shit because it was known that TLOU was trash despite paid journos shilling it.
>they're all against Nintendo! it's a conspiracy!
>>715634589>the entire industry is pro Nintendo, it's a conspiracy! There's no way Sony would lost every single time!you started it
>>715612775 (OP)>only a 90Must be the sinlge worst game ever amirite?
>>715630431black american trans coded
>SL1600 is a 10 minute straight line to the boss
>kremling krew are just a model swap of the skeletal versions and are still inside of rocks for some reason
>>715634589Evidence of bias against Nintendo:
>>715621353Evidence of bias for Nintendo: uuuh, some games get good scores
>>715634669>I'm as retarded as a snoy hahathis isn't a win...
>>715612775 (OP)Tendies are mad as fuck
>>715633410the girl isn't a boy, that's a good start
the bar is 6ft under. after this, we might raise it above ground level
>>715634757>Evidence of bias for Nintendototk having a 96.
this shit was a half-assed DLC
>>715634875>this shit was a half-assed DLCYou evidently did not play the game and got your opinions from the internet.
ba
md5: 63c69c7085f4a00f91c8ac5fb2727762
🔍
Nintendo
>4k!!
>60fps!!!
>120Hz VRR!!!!
>DLSS 4!!!
Reality:
>1080p with res drops
>drops to 30fps and lower
>VRR only in handheld and doesn't even work properly
>FSR1
>we're only one month in and it's already this bad
what a fucking joke, what the hell happened?
>>715612775 (OP)>Donkey Kong, Zelda, Mario name on cover>40 year old journo reviewer "I haven't played it yet, but I'm giving it a 95/100"
>>715634771I kinda am because they're trying to sell me on Odyssey being much better than this and I don't believe it.
>>715634959The goddamn launch game not even running at 4k OR 120hz was a bad omen from the start.
>>715634928I played it.
same map, same combat, mostly same enemies, even the story have the exact same structure.
Even Ubisoft isn't this blatant when it come to reusing shit for their next game.
The game was a big "physics toys" DLC
>>715635248>same mapwrong.
>same combatlike soulslop?
>mostly same enemiesnope.
>muh story structureirrelevant.
>>715634354>>715633980Wow, making the first panel guy a tranny was all it took to set the snoys off.
>>715633980MLP is the fucking Odyssey compared to TLoU.
Botw while not really doing anything innovative, had minimal cutscenes and all gameplay, game is sorta challenging if you don't upgrade clothes at the fairy fountain, I give it a solid 78
TOTK made brought Banjo Nuts And bolts gameplay and made it optional, and two new overlords but still suffer from being completely empty. Nothing lives in the sky nor underground. Golden nut collecting is still in the game and weapons still break after 10 swings, so mining for zonite is almost discouraged.
65 out of 100. Nothing new, but it brought back Rares nuts and bolts
>>715634771madly hype as fuck to play a good game
>finally realize 25 years later that your series already has a main villain and players want to see him because he's iconic
>drastically alter your main character
>>715634531Yeah, kind of wanted him to have a psychotic british accent
>>715635367>same map>wrong.No, adding 10% of a new map as sky island and an empty wasteland full of recolored enemies isn't a "new map".
>like soulslop?at least they add new move sets and weapons and not just the 3 hammer,spear,sword.
what's sad is that TOTK made the combat worse by making you spend so much more time in the horrible menu.
>nope.yes, it's true you still spend most of the game fighting the same fucking enemies as in BOTW
>irrelevantNew full price game just copies paste you his entire narrative structure? irrelevant.
God tendies are the ultimate consooomer.
>>715612913>8/10>bad????????
>>715612775 (OP)>walk 2 meters>omg, bananananana>dig 3 times>omg, bananananananaa "game" made for infants and modern game jurnalists
>>715636325yes, everything below a 9,9/10 is terrible
>add pedo content
>leftie journalists hype it up
>>715612775 (OP)nice nintendo bonus
Shouldn't have make Donkey Kong ugly.
HOLY FUCK this game looks bad
>>715633484>He didn't even have a cope answer for thisKWAB
>>715613083That's like 65 with the Nintendo bonus
>>715637190It seriously drops to 30 FPS? What in the world, is it because the S2 cpu is so weak?
>>715636286I care about what matters. The map is not the same, points of interest are totally different. The new mechanics are a ton of fun. Idc about your gay bullshit about "muh story structure".
>>715638691It's a last-minute swtich 1 port, dumbass. It's not yet optimized for switch 2
>>715637190Nintendo trying to copy Kojimas low framerate doll meme but it looks like shit
>>715638825So it was 10 fps on the Switch 1?!
>>715638691the CPU is even weaker in docked mode. Also it's double-buffer v-sync and it uses FSR1.
It's a disaster.
AstroBot looks like 50x better
>>715612775 (OP)i just don't think it should cost $550 plus tip is all
>>715639138Why does this price keep increasing every fucking week?
>>715632034Per Nintendo, Switch 1 couldn't handle the environment destruction. What a joke.
Joking aside, no one here actually plays games rated less than 99.5/100, right? Love yourself for Christ sake
>>715612775 (OP)Funny how you got BTFO, huh?
>>715616351Closer to 4 if you're not autistic
So whats your plan when DK debuts with 2 million copies sold?
>>715639317>ignore 90% of the content because "muh main story"Why? Why even play the game if you don't like the content?
>>715639394>Tendies brought slop>oh no no no no>Tendies are so retarded it's not even funny>Tendies are a cultProbably something along those lines give or take a mass spam of images to deflect and console war.
>>715639512>7 year dev time>only 4 hours of main content>"this is ok actually"lmao
>>715639317There's nothing more autistic than making up lies about a toy just because it wasn't made by your favourite toy manufacturer
>>715639394Oh, about three times as many threads by angry Sony and PCfags spamming "tendie", like that will magically make the game less of a success.
>>715639683>main contentMain content just means unskippable content. It doesn't mean the other content is lower quality, at all.
>>715637190The Switch 2 JUST came out and 1st party already RUNS like this?
>>715637190Don't tendies get tired of these floating island games?
>>715619117>will probably outsoldESL yourself saaaaar
>>715640176look at the post that was in reply to, anon...
>>715639512>random bananas everywherewhat's the point?
it's like cutting everything out of Breath of the Wild, except the poop.
>>715640293Damn, I may not be ESL but I do have poor reading comprehension. It's so over
>>715640142it's worth $500 because it's super powerful, basically a PS5 they said
>>715640406>Implying the game is not full of optional challenges like every other Nintendo game, even more so as it is made by the Odyssey team.ok, dishonest faggot.
>>715640494Hi, what's the price of a Steam Dreck again?
Anyway
IGN - 10
COGconnected - 10
Inverse - 10
Siliconera - 10
Console Creatures - 10
Digitec - 10
GFinity - 10
Nintenduo - 9.7
Nintenderos - 9.7
Digital Trends - 9
Digitally Downloaded - 9
My Nintendo News - 9
Nintendo Life - 9
Metro - 9
PlaySense - 9
ShackNews - 9
Vooks - 9
GameSpot - 9
VGC - 8
TheSixthAxis - 8
Eurogamer - 8
>>715640494whats the price of that new xbox handheld again? $1050?
the $800 Ps5 pro has framerates that ping-pong between 10 and 50 FPS when playing games that came out years ago?
>>715640586>challengesthere were none in Odyss
>even more sothere were none in Odyss
>sit on random bench>WOW; BANANA>I was CHALLENGEDI see, you mean mentally challenged.
Oh my GOD, universal acclaim!?
>>715640850that won't run release year games at 10 fps lol
>$90 game
>5 hour campaign
>10 hours for 100%
>unoptimized piece of shit
>ps2 graphics
"goty" lmao
>>715612845Tendies kept saying it would be 96 GOTY.
Now the Tendies are coping...
>>715640975well shitch 2 owners have no games, so this will be goty, because there is nothing else lol
>>715640861>there were none in Odysslie.
>sit on random benchYes, all moons were like that, you are so above it all and such a superior gamer. God forbid a game combines exploration/observation with puzzles and platforming of varying difficulty.
file
md5: 2319c18cb48e5b664e77b0ff0205fbf2
🔍
>>715639394Probably more of this kind of spam.
They already had to change the narrative when they thought there would be no K.Rool.
>>715637190Cool PS2 game, LMAO!
>>715640975>false>false>false>false>objectively falseSchizos mad they don't have emulator lost
>>715641151holy fucking mindbroken
>>715641151just think
we have 8 more years of 24/7 snoy meltdown
then the switch 3 will release and we may have another round of it
>>715640975>campaignJust ousted yourself as a retarded snoy. There is no such thing in Nintendo games. MOST of the content is optional, and of the same quality as the rest.
>>715612913WIthout the anti Donkey Kong bonus it's a 100/100
>>715641337maybe he means main story
>>715616351to me 8 hours of mindless fun sounds more appealing than the standard 80 hour endless slop full of needless cutscenes and dialogue
kek
md5: 9aa4fb5343b81203f8360c2d62aa7638
🔍
>snoys are trying to claim PS2 games are bad
>PS2 was the last time sony had good games
if you want to insult nintendo by comparing it to a sony flop you should try the PS3, 4, or 5
>>715641147>exploration>sit on the 500 benches in "game">one gives you a bananana>wow, what a great "game"
>>715641524>>snoys are trying to claim PS2 games are badYou need to work on your reading comprehension, mexican bro.
>>715641337BS
in actual Nintendo games you play through most of the content and then there is BONUS content
this banana here is just a scam
>>715641514It should be priced accordingly though. E33 is only about 30 hours if you go through the main story but it's $50. That's a fair price, $70 for a game that's apparently 5 1/2 hours to complete is a bit silly, even at 20 hours a $70 price tag is asking a bit much, that game should be $50 at most.
>>715641781so you're saying the new DK is good? you're comparing it to PS2
>>715641151>game coming out>there are multiple threads on itHOLY FUCK STOP SPAMMING!!!
utter derangement
>>715641963uh-huh, right.
>>715641963>All of them are seethe threads done by the same faggot who lives in Washington and is a janitor who got fired (imagine being so bad at your job as a janitor you got fired)
>>715641963you're not fooling anybody if you're trying to get us to believe this is organic. Almost nothing is anymore on this retarded board
>>715642385Go btich about the gacha threads those aren't even video games
>>715633616the highest rated original game this year is a 93...
>>715633616>anything untilAsk me how I know you are german
>>715641849if I can see a lot of effort has been put into the few hours of gameplay and the game is extremely well polished I don't have problem paying the full AAA price for a short game. that has usually been the case with most first party nintendo games. I'm on the fence about DK though
This will sell despite how bad it is because it's the only game on switch 2
>>715642624NTA but they gave them 97/100 iirc.
>>715642620>nintendo games are very very very shortlet's fact check this
3D World:
Main Story10½ Hours
Main + Extra18½ Hours
Completionist37½ Hours
Xenoblade
Main Story57 Hours
Main + Extra83½ Hours
Completionist142 Hours
Luigi's Mansion 3
Main Story13 Hours
Main + Extra17 Hours
Completionist22 Hours
Eternal Darkness
Main Story13 Hours
Main + Extra15½ Hours
Completionist30 Hours
Mario Galaxy
Main Story14 Hours
Main + Extra21½ Hours
Completionist35½ Hours
We irate this claim fake and gey
3 hours of content is ridiculous
tendo
md5: 1f119f82bdba6870c4c06c07c1f6f2d8
🔍
Stfu tendies
Journalists rated perfect Wii U games at 5/10
now they rate slop game with no content and running like shit at 10/10
>no, no, they weren't paid off
file1
md5: f794cbd97ee9751bc5c827933862b587
🔍
>>715642954>Luigi's Mansion 3Anon, where are you getting your numbers from?
This is a serious question.
dkb
md5: 981b3b3d88ad42dda92fea4c0deab7ee
🔍
>>715643153whats even worse is only 11 outlets gave donkey kong chudzaza 10/10 and only one of them was a tendie site, they are HATING on this chudcel game
>>715643463>I speedrun all games and use glitches>that's why Xenoblade only lasts 1 hour
>>715643426eslbaby you can just wait for the emulator to come out in silence. You don't have to make these posts.
>>715643574Retard, the xenoblade game was 36 hours and none of those are speedruns you idiot.
They are all 100% playthroughs of the main fucking story, you couldn't even get your own shitpost right.
I'm asking you again, where did you get your numbers from?
Give a fucking source.
>>715643749>this is not a speedrun>I just know everything in advance and skip cutscenes
>>715643463soon
>Donkey Banananana walkthrough>30 minuteslmao
I bought a Switch 2 but I'm on the fence with returning it. MKW was exactly what I thought it would be, MK8 but with an empty useless world.
Hows Mario Odyssey but with monke? Im seeing its about 20 hours? Is it actually fun? Or did i buy a $500 paperweight?
>>715643839>Couldn't give a source>Physically hurt themselves trying to reply>bullshit in green text as alwaysYep, shitpost central, fuck right off you neanderthal.
>$100 dollars
>2 hours of gameplay
>320p
>n64 graphics
We are NOT buying this folks. We are boycotting.
>>715643749>I'm totally legit with my speedrun videoshttps://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL5bkYBlFL9xf678-eJZDjrM55zh1xC-Kh
weird that actual playthroughs take 63 videos, 1.5 hours each
fucking tendie shills on suicide watch
>>715643935>Im seeing its about 20 hours?Depends on if you rush or not. Finding everything can take twice that long.
>>715643935We convicted it of having just 20 minutes of gameplay (all sitting on a bench), so no, you shouldn’t buy it.
>>715644154yes, this time there are 20.000 benches, and 4 bananas are hidden.
this will boost the "play" time at least for 3 hours
traded in my ps5 for a bottle of pepsi and 250 usd at gamestop and bought a switch 2 + mkw bundle for 500, feelin good fellahs. this must be what it feels like to have games
>>715612775 (OP)Jesus that's bad. Shitch 2 can't catch a brake.
>>715612845Yes, unironically. The most mid nintendo games get a 85-90 scores. Anything nintendo under 85 is total garbage.
>>715643426>perfect Wii U gamesLOL. LMAO
>>715642620I dunno, Nintendo's games are usually lower budget so it's not like there's an extra cost that needs to be paid towards the devs to offset production costs. There's just not really an excuse to be paying premium costs for most of their games. Any AA game falls under this, I wouldn't pay $70 for some new Loco Roco either.
>>715644439>to have games2 games?
>>715643426anon, which perfect WiiU game did journos rate 5/10?
>reviewfags when a game gets a 90 instead of a 92
AIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>715644848are you too stupid to use a search engine, shill?
>>715644836my ps5 only had gt7 and ds2 (time limited) so i think its a good deal
Ok but for real how is it? Anyone here actually play the demo?
>>715644880I think people are just mad because it's obvious there's a E33 mandate now
>>715645023ps5 has actually proper backward compatibility and tons of games, the Shitch has nothing.
>>715644923anon amiibo festival isnt an underrated masterpiece, despite you being born when the game came out.
>time as a measure of quality
Haven't seen this shitpost in years, guess the Switch 2 seethe really does give more
>>715629584Odyssey is the best game made in the last decade, that's why.
>>715645137>pretending to be retardedtendie shill, go away
>>715645149when you are a child with downs
>jump 3 times>moon jingle>walk 10 meters>moon jingle
>>715645115>actually proper backward compatibilityOh i can play PS3 games?
>>715645115it had gran turismo 7, astrobot (looked good but wasnt interested in it) and for now it has ds2 (pretty good but i beat it) the rest are just ports from pc and boring slop like spider man. the ps5 library of psx/ps2 games is incredibly limited and the ps5 emulator for both sucks ass compared to pcsx2 and duckstation
>>715644054sir the Last of US re-re-re-re-re-release thread is 6 pages down
>>715645308you want Snoy to deliver way more than Nintendo ever did? lol
>>715645383>Uncharted was a PC classic and sold 100 million copies, and got ported to Playstation, which sold horribly
>>715645269Yes, when you are a child with downs it makes it hard to understand why there would be collectibles encouraging platforming, that is true.
>>715645189>everyone who calls me out on my bullshit is a shill
>Trusting game journalists
>Trusting reviews before game is launched
>Not just buying the games you want to play and deciding if you like them
What are you fucking poor?
>>715634210You lost, the troons won. Same reason everyone insists sylveon is the tranny pokemon
>>715645658>encouragingMushroom Kingdom Power Moon 103 - Jump 10000 times.
>mom, look I jumped 10.000 times and got another shitty moon
>>715645825Go buy more shovelware slop you fag
No "longplay [no commentary]" no purchase
>>715645692>let's take the worst Wii U gamestill better than most Shitch games, especially Shitch Deux
>>715643153Nintendo life gave it a 9 and not a 10 because it wasn't Mario.
>>715633882Americans are butthurt that japan and japanese culture keep absolutely destroying american culture so they spend billions a year astroturfing anything that can work to attack japan
>>715633882Stfu seething snoy
You lost and got raped Eric
>>715642954>Luigi's Mansion 3Completionist REQUIRES multiplayer with ESL retards, so absolutely the fuck not 22 hours lmao
>>715646945done very quick, because it's not broken trash like Luigi's Mansion 2 on 3DS, that disconnects all the time
>>715644880>Tendies when a Nintendo game gets a 90 instead of a 92FIFY
>>715647083Maybe now but when I played it the multiplayer was trash and so were the servers.
Shit, Nintendo uses garbage netcode in general, I tried some SMM2 multiplayer today and it was constant lag and dropped connections. Don't just take my word for it either, plent of videos on YouTube showing this bs. Some of Simpleflips vids show it and he complains about it too, everyone does.
Also Luigi's Mansion 2 in general is BAD. 3 is pretty good, 1 is still the best for the horror theming instead of frequent kiddo goofy shit, but 2 is just the worst of all 3.
And no I am not counting the arcade only Luigi's mansion, that is jap only AND a shitty port of 2.
I will say though it was very funny in 2 on that mansion towards the end of the game, to have toad get eaten by one of those flytrap enemies in that greenhouse-like area. Should've resulted in a game over though lol.
Also, 2 on the switch has a fuckton of bugs. I had my save file hardlocked because I managed to die in a CUTSCENE on that one gear area, where you have to start up the gears?
There was one of those bomb bots that went off, in a cutscene and killed me. It somehow bugged my save file, absolute garbage game because of that and many other bugs.
>>715648241no, Luigi's Mansion 3 worked fine.
I caught everything within a few hours
Luigi's Mansion 2 is totally broken, I managed to go to top floor maybe 5 times, all the other times players randomly disconnected after a few floors and the game shat itself right afterwards
>>715648395Well good for you for not playing 3 on launch then. Nintendo's netcode in general is still shite.
Oh and you really don't get any reward for 100% 2 either so I wouldn't bother unless you want a literal glorified golden sticker for your save file that much.
Pikmin 2 did it so much better with 100%ing the game, hard as fuck but you get to really see what a bastard louie is lol.
I am not going to buy a switch 2 until they have a Pikmin game for it.
>>715648706the problem is that Luigi's Mansions 2 multiplayer was actually way superior to 3, but it was also broken. The fun was there, the challenge was there, it was just broken.
they should have fixed that shit.
and also the retarded design flaw, that everyone has to reach the exit combined with a timer, because that means one player goes afk for a minute, and it's over for everyone. Plain retarded design.
>>715612775 (OP)So take the score, remove 10-15 points for the Nintendo bonus and Bananza comes out to about a 75 or 80ish game. Got it.
IT JUST WENT UP AGAIN NOOOO
so whats the deal of Pauline loli?
Bananza is a prequel? DK is not really the DK we know?
NEED ANSWERS
>>715643426Wii U revisionists are so fucking funny, they owned a totally different console.
>>715653606>I can't into controls>but I love this broken piece of shit Remilk 4, that controls like garbage, but it's standard controls so I don't have to learn controls
>>715653606Star fox zero was robbed worse than star fox adventures.
>>715626285We honestly need to increase the tariffs to protect more Americans from this slop.
Imagine how many people will get hoodwinked into buying this when they could have bought a Hat in Time.
>>715646346Your grubhub ass looking game is not destroying anything lol.
>>715618479tropical freeze was boring shit
>>715624759Yeah man, let's pretend all the 10/10s for Bananza from Nintendolife, Nintendong, Nintendung, Nintentranny and many other obvious Nintendo shill sites are legit.
>>715619042You're not solely anti-Snoy. You're anti non-Nintendo and have unhinged takes like these. Explains how enraged third-party titles you can't play get you.
>>715612775 (OP)Alright, where can I pirate it?
>>715659814>Nintendolifethey gave it a 9/10 and the reviewer was seething about the fact that it wasn't a mario game
>>715612845It's not about it been good or even great. It's about it being the top contender for GOTY
>>715659814Nintendo "fan" sites actually contributed to both this game and Mario Kart having lower scores, massive faggot.
>>715659814lmao do you even understand how divided nintendo fanbases are? some of them were already seething when donkey kong bananza was announced claiming mario was forgotten. having nintendo sites in there is actually detrimental for nintendo games as the different nintendo fanbases don't have the hivemind sonygroes have
>>715651889So it's the best donkey kong game ever made!
resetera
md5: 38ee577b3659e4c77b516b0b323d3066
🔍
Funnily enough a Resetera reviewer was the one person with enough backbone to write a negative review. Seems like Joseph Anderson's critique holds true again.
>>715663101doesn't matter what this attention whore thinks as his review doesn't count for metacritic or opencritic
>>715662478>>715662478It's funny, DK and Metroid being both launch window games almost feels like a response to the backlash Tropical Freeze got when it was announced.
>>715618479Tropical freeze had fantastic level design. Better than dkc3/r90, but maybe not as good as dkc1/2
>>715663101BANNED FOR NOT COMPLYING WITH HIVE-MIND
>>715612913I'd argue 5 points lower than that when you also remove reviewers with Nintendo in their names