>>715816385People don't like your reasoning because
>somebody who does things for money>somebody who does things for money and is too richIs an arbitrary distinction you make. Kulaks didn't think they were too rich.
>most muricans defend it because they would do the exact same thing in their shoesAnd most people bitching about rich people only do so because they know they won't be in those shoes.
Ragging on rich people is pointless. They will always exist, if not monetarily then some other way. Like it or not, Bezos provided a lot of value to a lot of people over the years. He should be rich.
The problem isn't being rich. It's tax avoidance, lobbying and trying to influence public opinion.
And creating dynasties of rich people that provided no actual value beyond the first generation, but "death tax" is too scary to some. Bezos earned being richer me, Bezos' great-great-grandkid didn't earn being richer than my great-great-grandkid