> Baldur's Gate 3 is not wok-ACK

So why do BG3 fans cope so much claiming their game is not "progressive" garbage?
99% of the characters are strong female warriors, 99% of the cast is brown and 99% of the cast is queer.

> B-but you can't kill em all!
No, no, you can't kill them all. For example unless you're Dark Urge killing at a very specific moment, killing Gale means game over. If you kill Shadowheart then you will never be able to kill that dyke angel in Act 2 and she can ONLY be killed by Shadowheart. You also can't kill the strong empowered girl boss Gythyanki lich queen, if you're even disrespectful to her she wipes your party

So why so much cope? Just say you like the game regardless of w*ke becuase it gave you porn and a dating sim experience which you lve because you'll never experience love or sex in real life.

posted it again award.jpg

>>715818510 (OP)
You can kill Gale by leaving him in the portal as Tav

>>715818510 (OP)

Sage. All of that is either hyperbolic or literallt gameplay/story mechanics.
Whats your fucking plan for dealing with Vlaakith at level 7 you moron? Gale has a bomb in his body as a story hook = woke? You're either stupid or poisoning the well.

>>715818721
> Claims you can kill every NPC in the game so it's not w*ke
>> You can't actually kill every npc

Why would you guys lie then? Just admit the game is w*ke and move on, nobody is gonna hit you like your daddy does because you liked a w*ke game.

>https://arch.b4k.dev/v/search/image/mUQMdpEe8Do4yJn6lS0c7w
Farquaad thread.

>>715818945
> Avatarfags as anime underage girls
> So terminally online he's obsessed with /v/ posters
yikes...

>>715818848
I didn't claim that. You created a nonsensical argument and are jumping down my throat. Vlaakith is a fucking astral projection. You CAN kill Gale, there are just consequences for it. You can kill Dame Alyin too, but because of the story it's difficult, you even mentioned needing Shadowfart to deal with it.

>>715819215
>but because of the story it's difficult

It's not "difficult", it's not an option outright. You can't kill the dyke unless Shadowheart is alive and in your party and evil. So no, you can't killl everyone. And even then what kind of argument is "you can kill this NPC so the game is based!"

You can kill the trans character in Dragon Age Inquisition and the non binary qunari in Veilguard yet people still call it w*ke.

shut the fuck up retard

>>715818720
I literally played bg3 as the biggest homophobe on the swordcoast lol

>>715818510 (OP)
>YOU CAN’T KILL THE DYKE ANGEL!
Not the game’s fault that you are too retarded to use the tools it gives you

>>715819512
It was almost kill on sight, it would be if the angel lady could be killed but i had to just imprisson her and kill her gf

>>715819512

Haha based!!!! you played a game in which the main story of act 2 revolves around dykes, all the cast is feminist black people but you're such an homophobe!! heckin zased.

>they only put the gay characters in so you can kill them the devs arent woke at all!!
hoooooly cope

>>715819627
Thanks, u too king

No no guys you see it's ok i played this game filled with drag queens, dykes and all npcs are black or women in positions of power, because i romanced Shadowheart and that's based!
> But she cheats on you with Hals-
LALALALALALALALAAAAAAA BASED BASED GAME IS BASED

HE CANT KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH IT!

>>715820091

Remember that time he had a massive meltdown and wrote a huge rant blog complaining not enough women played Divinity Original Sin 2?

>>715818510 (OP)
I suck cock at least once a week AMA

>>715820156
Remember that time he walked up on stage, took a massive shit on the chink flag, and said Astrobot is a million times better than any parryslop out there? You fags sure seethed alot over that

>>715818720
What a disingenuous fucking comic. If you played the game on release then you fucking KNOW that romance flags were overtuned for journos, and one innocuous interaction could pump your approval points straight into sex scene territory. Then there were ambiguous dialogue options (wizard companion asking if you'd like to see a magic trick, leading to a make-out session) that were so bad they even got patched later.

Sure, nowadays the game is fairly tame with the romances (everyone being PC-sexual at all times under all circumstances is still dumb though), but on release it was a genuine cum-stained mess.

>>715820547

Oh yeah it was when he accused Wukong devs of forcing their employees to crunch

>>715820674
>the game is fairly tame with the romances

it's not really, the second you're nice to a companion they throw themselves at you, if you just ask questions about Karlach backstory in Act 1 the next time you go to sleep she sits next to you and talks about how she wants to have sex with you, and your rejection options are very "M-maybe another time?" and not some clear cut "fuck off bitch"

Game is still 100% a dating sim with nothing going on for it other than porn and romances.

>>715820720
You chinks absolutely hated how he exposed your entire corrupt industry. So hard that you tried to review bomb the game but failed miserably

>>715821598
> Larian forces their devs to work overtime
> Wukong forces their devs to work overtime
>> HA LARIAN UHH ARE THE GOOD GUYS AND THEY UHHHH COMPLETLY OWNED CHINA!

Are you ok?
Did Shadowheart cheat on you with Halsin yet?

>>715821706
It’s hilarious how you chinks starts crying about life being unfair the moment you fail. Larian produced a timeless masterpiece that revolutionized crpgs by working a couple of weekends. Meanwhile Wukong was running a sweatshop and only managed to produce slop that is already being forgotten. At best it will be remembered as “that chinese dark souls clone?”

>>715818510 (OP)
Baldur's Gate 3 is woke
It's one of the very rare instances of a game managing to be good in spite of its wokeness

>>715822406
>Larian produced a timeless masterpiece that revolutionized crpgs

But nobody cares about it now, and nobody cared about it then other than transexuals and lonely sexless incels :s

Are you seething becuase WUkong got more players on the steam charts?

>>715822571
>It thinks chink bots are legitimate players
KEKAROOOOOOOO!!!! But since you are obsessed with player numbers, how about you compare the current players?
>Hard mode
Compare current players without ACKing yourself