Thread 715828958

ITT: "But why? *

>>715829032
dam son

>>715828958 (OP)
>one of the best selling consoles of all time
I mean, why wouldn’t you try to dump a port of your game on the DS?

>>715828958 (OP)
why not

>>715828958 (OP)
DS getting a bunch of niche shit like that is part of its appeal though

The DS had some of the strangest shit.

>>715828958 (OP)
I command thee, KNEEL

>>715828958 (OP)
The touch screen. Honestly, it seemed like a perfect fit for a title using the Ragnarok Online IP as a standalone single player spin-off. It even had a multiplayer mode. The execution wasn't the greatest due to the pixel density and some mechanics translated to single player a bit awkwardly, but I liked it.

>>715831023
would you say that it still would be worth it to try it now (maybe even in coop with some friends)?

>>715828958 (OP)
I think a lot of it was that the DS printed money, so if you had the assets already made you could cobble up anything and it would be guaranteed to sell

>>715829032
bobr kurwa

>>715828958 (OP)
>>715830018
How many MMO's tried to do the single player console experience?

>>715828958 (OP)
This was fun...

>>715832918
Not many if you don't count spinoffs. Which is retarded because a lot of the Korean ones looked like jrpgs, even borrowing actual Japanese artists from other Japanese games. Talk about a country full of wasted potential.

>>715833247
Every platform of that license game was different...

>>715832918
Imagine Runescape on the DS, it'd have been perfect

is it good tho?