>>715841138My uncle is a fan of football. Has a whole get together with a half dozen other guys to watch superbowl shit. The guy is a bloated mess that's never once played football, and likely hasn't run more than a minute in his life. But he hangs out with all the others, sharing in wins, discussing bets, all that nonsense.
I'd say he's a fan. I never felt that he had to play football to be part of that "fandom". He's a sports fan through and through. It's never been a requirement to actually play the sport, at least in that community. Why does it have to be one in this community?
>>715841148Last I checked sports are meant to be played. Yes, they can be a spectacle, but you have no sports without someone putting hands on a ball or bat. Every comparison to mentioned is the same as games. Games have been turned into more of a spectacle these days, with games solely designed to be streamer-bait or even involve audiences. No one argues about people being sports fans because they aren't running a field. At least I never see that "fanbase" get fussy about that distinction. I only really see that nitpicking in vidya, which is strange when it may as well be the same kind of tribalism, dedication, and elitism you see in other hobbies just like sports.
Again, just seems like a silly distinction to essentially pull a "not a real fan" argument. Which then goes even further at times into absurdity. You used an item in a game to beat it? Not a real fan, didn't experience it properly. You played it years after it came out? Not a real fan, you didn't join the original community. It's nonsense and spirals into a weird direction I feel.