Anonymous
7/19/2025, 3:33:34 PM
No.715881460
[Report]
>>715881916
i often wonder how good the great military minds throughout history would be at modern strategy games
Anonymous
7/19/2025, 3:38:50 PM
No.715881818
[Report]
>>715883040
NO STEBBING ON BENIS :DDD
>>715881460 (OP)
I would fucking destroy Napoleon at forged alliance.
Anonymous
7/19/2025, 3:43:20 PM
No.715882047
[Report]
>>715883359
>>715881916
Napoleon would tele-snipe your ass
Anonymous
7/19/2025, 3:46:38 PM
No.715882224
[Report]
Napoléon actually tried the scholar's mate like the fraud he is and lost miserably
against the stockfish of his era
https://youtu.be/PqrCnikK0gY
Anonymous
7/19/2025, 3:47:04 PM
No.715882252
[Report]
After a sufficient period of getting used to computers and the games themselves, highly competent, but because they tended to be driven smart people that learn quickly and can get serious about stuff, not because there's any transferable skills or of note. If, say, Hannibal Barca has some special insight to how bodies of men will behave in combat, as he undoubtedly does, then that could only be detrimental, because no game behaves anything like how real combat works. One thing that might transfer over would be decisiveness, but I think that's more of a personality trait than "skill".
Anonymous
7/19/2025, 3:48:50 PM
No.715882358
[Report]
Never interrupt your enemy when they are in the process of destroying themselves
Anonymous
7/19/2025, 4:01:31 PM
No.715883082
[Report]
>>715883359
>>715881916
Napoleon was good at chess, he'd wipe you.
Anonymous
7/19/2025, 4:03:16 PM
No.715883183
[Report]
>>715881916
>2006/2007
>company of heroes
>supreme commander
>world in conflict
>command and conquer 3
i'm beginning to think that we're living in a dark age of gaming
Anonymous
7/19/2025, 4:06:15 PM
No.715883359
[Report]
>>715882047
>>715883082
Yeah in your fucking dreams Nappy I know its you, see you on Finn's Revenge.
