Thread 716049674 - /v/ [Archived: 206 hours ago]

Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:08:07 PM No.716049674
GettyImages-1241557730-1
GettyImages-1241557730-1
md5: 6166f020a62881858fa642a8c669b047๐Ÿ”
All right, femoids of /v/. I have to accept as a man that vidyas are now made to appease these people. I imagine you've had to put up with the opposite your whole life. How do I learn to enjoy vidyas that are made for people like this?
Replies: >>716049784 >>716051312 >>716051363 >>716051370 >>716051531 >>716051786 >>716052363 >>716052629 >>716052674 >>716053536
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:10:01 PM No.716049784
>>716049674 (OP)
There are no women on 4chan
Replies: >>716049869 >>716051502
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:11:16 PM No.716049869
>>716049784
I'm a woman
Replies: >>716051090 >>716052046
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:29:38 PM No.716050994
Watch another man fuck your wife
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:31:11 PM No.716051090
>>716049869
Post tits or gtfo
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:32:40 PM No.716051185
Why are incels too retarded to make their own videogames?
Replies: >>716051254 >>716051564 >>716052225
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:33:54 PM No.716051254
>>716051185
Because you touch yourself at night
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:34:46 PM No.716051312
>>716049674 (OP)
Pontificate upon the pungency.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:35:36 PM No.716051363
>>716049674 (OP)
KEEP YOUR LAWS OUT OF MY GAMES
KEEP YOUR PAYMENT PROCESSORS OUT OF MY GAMES
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:35:41 PM No.716051370
1748587657805474
1748587657805474
md5: ee6fb3d4724ea3985951ffd34e2ba9b4๐Ÿ”
>>716049674 (OP)
They're not made for them, they're made by them. Female game devs just want shitty self insert oc's that are ugly like them with the same shitty outlook on life. Women statistically prefer games with sexy female characters just like men. It's just shrieking harpies like the recent Collective Shout, that's trying to fuck up the industry because their boyfriends would rather fuck their hands than them.
Replies: >>716051464 >>716051656
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:37:23 PM No.716051464
IMG_1669
IMG_1669
md5: 617c9b9c72435c0f762213e32e272d31๐Ÿ”
>>716051370
>wordswordswordswords
Canโ€™t meme.
Replies: >>716051538 >>716053358
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:38:02 PM No.716051491
Most manga and anime written by women is superior to their male counterparts. Why can't it be the same for the west?
Replies: >>716052295
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:38:11 PM No.716051502
>>716049784
>trans women are not women
Yeah ok dumbass chud
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:38:52 PM No.716051531
>>716049674 (OP)
men never tried to ban or censor games made for women
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:38:56 PM No.716051538
>>716051464
So much for media literacy being important
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:39:12 PM No.716051564
>>716051185
Most game devs are incels or nerds tho
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:40:48 PM No.716051656
>>716051370
>Wah wah wah
Man the fuck-up. Yes, we don't have the same privileges as women, because we don't need them. We are men, we can do shit by ourselves.
Replies: >>716051909 >>716052249
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:43:01 PM No.716051786
1736978010174388
1736978010174388
md5: 62fcf8a5626259a20e9c18ee03c38f27๐Ÿ”
>>716049674 (OP)
what are you talking about? it's over for Western games. now, people play gachas, or asian Dark Souls-like. other games make little money. no need to learn anything new, dude
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:44:53 PM No.716051909
GwJbW_VXUAAGHiz
GwJbW_VXUAAGHiz
md5: fbe60533220c18197e38dbeb9ed3d56b๐Ÿ”
>>716051656
>we are men we can do shit by ourselves
except for get a job with a college degree apparently. the unemployement rate for college educated men is now the same as men who didn't go to college, but for women it's far lower. Retards like you who go "I"m a man, I don't need help" is why we're going down this slippery slope to begin with. Hope you aren't competing with a woman for promotions at work, the odds are stacked against you.
Replies: >>716052318 >>716053602
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:46:59 PM No.716052046
>>716049869
I never know whether it's true or I'm talking to a "woman". Sorry, but it just often seems like men who claim to be women are the "women" in here.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:49:46 PM No.716052225
>>716051185
This is a good idea actually I really like it. Like an incel genre.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:50:03 PM No.716052249
>>716051656
Privileged classes shouldn't exist in the first place.
Replies: >>716052707
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:50:45 PM No.716052295
>>716051491
The game Hotel Dusk on Nintendo DS was also written by a female narrative director. So was Deus Ex Human Revolution, but especially the former is so fucking good, that it singlehandledly made me want to explore literature written by women.

I find the main difference that comes from the sensibilities of gender is that women are not at all averse to "edgy" content, but they're not thinking with a penis, so they write characters in a way that makes them way more 3 dimensional than men do. And they still write male characters with a lot of "balls". But so often, male writers become like Kodaka who makes Danganronpa. They reveal that they're porn addicts through the writing, and couldn't resist making the women exist for the sake of titilating the viewer, and it fails the writing as they're largely mediocre characters in the text, but fans just love them because they're "hot".

But there's a lot of mediocre, trash-tier female writers who joined the industry out of activism, which is reflected in the average writing quality of AAA games with 8+ writers are just... insufferably badly written.
Replies: >>716052625
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:51:07 PM No.716052318
>>716051909
I am not. Because I already got a promotion. I doubt I will go further up the ladder in the company I work in, at least not until the older guys retire. And also because we only have one woman working there. Also, not a mutt, and dropped out of shcool and wasted my early twenties.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:51:48 PM No.716052363
3462364326236
3462364326236
md5: 10fabcfe669309f2f7a0ef34b76b2507๐Ÿ”
>>716049674 (OP)
From that fetish image left being less taboo right being more taboo, green/blue = men pink/red women.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:55:30 PM No.716052625
>>716052295
The problem with female writers is you often these days get piece of shits that are like you know it would be great to have this totally not gay but somehow into feminine hobby male character with no masculinity, it reeks of a woman's self-insert writing as the opposite gender and reads really shoehorned in sort of way. Its best when they don't try to blend non-traditionally male roles with male characters, its the most obvious shout when they do that the author is a woman if it were written like that by a Man it would have a different feel, the man would probably have more internal/social conflicts about such a situation until he proves others wrong or just builds a strong sense of self that can't be shaken easily just by outside critique instead of needing some woman to tell them what's right or wrong in that situation which is what female authors do, they think everyone else needs some savior figure to grow because they can't grow on their own.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:55:35 PM No.716052629
>>716049674 (OP)
>your whole life
women at large ignored the vidya space to not be appeased to because it wasn't popular and couldn't make easy money from it. They have been dealing with it their whole life
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:56:13 PM No.716052674
>>716049674 (OP)
You don't, because those games are made for those kinds of people, and not for you by the sounds of it.
So save your money and look for games that appeal to you, instead of feeling the need to play every kind of game for some asinine reason like it's popular, it's a new game in a really old IP made by a different studio, or it's made by the devs who made a really good game 2 decades ago.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:56:43 PM No.716052707
>>716052249
I disagree strongly. The whole notion that everyone is worth the same is ridiculous. And women are biologically speaking worth more than any single man, except the 0.1% that actually gets shit done.
Replies: >>716052971 >>716052983 >>716053182
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 4:00:29 PM No.716052971
>>716052707
Anon, society is ran from the bottom by men, that's why most civilizations used to wish people to have male kids or even discard female babies.
Replies: >>716053114
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 4:00:40 PM No.716052983
>>716052707
> Tranny posts.
Men are worth more, without men there wouldn't be innovation or work getting done, just look at all women trying to surive a desert island vs men.
> Those retards get lost day 1 while men manage to make civilization happen.
Get the fuck out tranny. Women are only good for: The bed, the breeding, the kitchen, the domestic care, the nursing and nurturing roles and entertainment. They aren't worth shit in a survival situation other than for continued life on earth. Ahahaha.
Replies: >>716053184
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 4:02:51 PM No.716053114
>>716052971
Yeah. But the vast majority of those men are just workers, and cannon fodder. They don't have any value beyond that. Women have intrinsic value, due to their ability to bear children.
Replies: >>716053251 >>716053375
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 4:03:47 PM No.716053182
>>716052707
From every conceivable metric of productivity, creative output, physical capability, scientific and societal advancement, men have out preformed women on all fronts since the beginning of time. Women are can bear children and are capable of caring and raising them, which is great but doesn't make them somehow more valuable. They do however need to be percieved as more valuable, because they are more vulnerable and at risk without the assistance of men to help them.
Replies: >>716053478
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 4:03:52 PM No.716053184
>>716052983
>Women are only good for: The things that make life worth living in the first place
Replies: >>716053432
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 4:03:56 PM No.716053190
FHs451fWUAEdGLD
FHs451fWUAEdGLD
md5: 79381e1d006df684b45df7b5f9c5ca40๐Ÿ”
>women are biologically speaking worth more than any single man
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 4:04:48 PM No.716053251
>>716053114
>Women have intrinsic value, due to their ability to bear children
this may shock you, but it takes two to tango. A child doesn't get made without a man involved, this arguement is retarded.
Replies: >>716053374
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 4:06:31 PM No.716053358
>>716051464
He said roasties make those games, not buy them
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 4:06:48 PM No.716053374
>>716053251
yeah but only one man would be needed for every hundred women.
Replies: >>716053862
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 4:06:52 PM No.716053375
>>716053114
Does that imply women stop holding value when they turn 40?
I think this argument falls apart because there's no scarcity of women and generally no biological competition, while being a man is a highly competitive space.
Replies: >>716053667
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 4:07:47 PM No.716053432
>>716053184
If apples make the world go round a tree that refuses to bear them or bears only poisoned apples is an affront to it.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 4:08:20 PM No.716053478
>>716053182
You are correct. But not in the way you think. Men have a much greater variability in all those aspects, and the ones that are responsible for progress, are not the average man. It's the outliers. The average man is worthless as anything other than a drone. And the variability in men does not only lead to geniuses, but also complete retards that actually hinders progress.
Women tend to not stray far from the average. Which is why they all seem to be so similar. Because they are so valuable, that they can't afford to experiment, but stay with what works.
So yes, are the great men that lead humanity worth more than women? For sure. But you're not one of them. And neither am I, nor anyone else on this site, for that matter.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 4:09:06 PM No.716053536
>>716049674 (OP)
Love from Kazakhstan.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 4:09:59 PM No.716053602
>>716051909
this explains why everything seems to be going to shit nowadays
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 4:10:58 PM No.716053667
>>716053375
No. Because that's not her only value. Only her greatest one. She still holds value as a preserver of culture, supporting her family, entertainment etc.
Replies: >>716053862
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 4:13:52 PM No.716053862
>>716053374
He might knock them up, but he can't feed all of them.
>>716053667
I don't think women are more valuable than men when it comes to those honestly. I also believe in childrearing the presence of a man is greatly undervalued, just look at this generation of men raised by single mothers.