OHNONONONONONONO
https://www.dealabs.com/magazine/battlefield-6-date-de-sortie-editions-prix-precommande-on-vous-devoile-toutes-nos-infos-inedites-60267

>>716228240 (OP)
Remember that EA wanted 100 MILLION players. This is just an excuse to kill DICE and Battlefield forever to focus on slot machines.

>>716228240 (OP)
I'll wait until it drops to $10 in a year. It's rumored that the game will release around the 10th of October, two months away, and they still haven't decided whether it will feature an open or locked class weapon system!?
EA fucked us over with BFV and 2042. I'm simply not buying at launch, so that in case this game flops and breaks EA/Dice, I could at least say I played a part in their demise.

DO NOT PRE-ORDER

It's going to be bad anyway because modern DICE are completely out of touch. Doesn't matter how much it costs, it's not worth it at any price.

Imagine playing a multiplayer online FPS war game made by a studio of faggots, niggers and women. I wonder if it will be anything like the last two failures they've made?

>>716228240 (OP)
>70 fucking dollars
>>>>>>80 on CONSOLES

AHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>716230482
Yes, it probably will. I haven't enjoyed a battlefield game since Band Company 2.

>>716228240 (OP)
Fuck Nintendo

>>716228240 (OP)
And how much is the full game? 200€?

>>716228240 (OP)
Not going to buy it unless DICE can truly redeem themselves.
>Give us substantial content updates again, no more live service slop dripfeed bullshit with one new map and a couple guns per year
>Focus on making Battlefield, not a shitty Tarkov clone and a shitty custom games mode that you stop properly supporting a month after the game comes out
>Let map designers make the maps, *then* let the concept artists flesh it out visually, *not* the other way around
>Include lore for the individual maps and why battles are happening and stuff like old games, but don't focus too much on story or characters — your writers can't write worth shit anyway and all people want is a good Battlefield game, plain and simple
With there being a campaign the last point will probably not be met since they're insistent on giving Battlefield games terrible stories and bland unmemorable characters, even though they had a fine blueprint for that sort of thing with Bad Company and they've just ignored it for whatever reason. I'd rather those resources just be put into making multiplayer better, but as long as multiplayer is still good anyway it doesn't really matter.

>paying for video games

>>716228240 (OP)
Battlefield is not a fun game.

>>716228240 (OP)
This is all shitendo's fucking fault. I swear we don't hate this company enough. Mario Kart World literally looks like a fucking gamecube game and they have the audacity to sell this shit for $90 fucking dollars, skin all tendies alive for destroying this industry

>>716228240 (OP)
>having the gall to raise the price after 2042
good luck getting those 100 million players

>>716231831
Snoy raised prices before Tendo

>>716231987
the difference is you stupid fucking nigger switch 2 games literally look like 20 year old games and not cutting edge graphics like snoy's games so for them to raise the price it was understandable, definitely not for shitendo

>>716231987
Nintendo still made $80 base games a thing so they still deserve some flack. They should've just kept to themselves and let Microsoft or someone make $80 games and take the blame.

>>716232127
uh oh Snoy melty!

>>716232127
>cutting edge graphics

>>716232236
I literally said snoy myself therefore i'm not a fucking snoy but of course your retarded manchild tendie brain can't comprehend that

>Battlefield 6 thread
>BUT NINTENDO
Literally deranged

>>716232296
so which games on console look better than PS5 games, hm retarded catnigger?

>>716232127
There is no excuse for raising the price of games to $70.

>>716228240 (OP)
>$80 game
>$60 in map packs
>battlefield premium service for $11.99 a month
I want to play a good battlefield again.
I pity whoever is stupid enough to buy a DICE title on release.

>>716228240 (OP)
I bought 2 Battlefield games for a couple euro each or something the last Steam sale and I still had to think about it

>>716232471
of course there is, snoy games take 5-10 years to make these days so development cost is way higher but there is ZERO excuse for shitendo to raise the fucking price

>>716232741
Maybe they should make their movies a lot cheaper and faster.

>>716232357
>snoybab's first falseflag

They targeted gamers.

Gamers.

We're a group of people who will sit for hours, days, even weeks on end performing some of the hardest, most mentally demanding tasks. Over, and over, and over all for nothing more than a little digital token saying we did.

We'll punish our selfs doing things others would consider torture, because we think it's fun.

We'll spend most if not all of our free time min maxing the stats of a fictional character all to draw out a single extra point of damage per second.

Many of us have made careers out of doing just these things: slogging through the grind, all day, the same quests over and over, hundreds of times to the point where we know evety little detail such that some have attained such gamer nirvana that they can literally play these games blindfolded.

Do these people have any idea how many controllers have been smashed, systems over heated, disks and carts destroyed 8n frustration? All to latter be referred to as bragging rights?

These people honestly think this is a battle they can win? They take our media? We're already building a new one without them. They take our devs? Gamers aren't shy about throwing their money else where, or even making the games our selves. They think calling us racist, mysoginistic, rape apologists is going to change us? We've been called worse things by prepubescent 10 year olds with a shitty head set. They picked a fight against a group that's already grown desensitized to their strategies and methods. Who enjoy the battle of attrition they've threatened us with. Who take it as a challange when they tell us we no longer matter. Our obsession with proving we can after being told we can't is so deeply ingrained from years of dealing with big brothers/sisters and friends laughing at how pathetic we used to be that proving you people wrong has become a very real need; a honed reflex.

Gamers are competative by nature. We love a challange. The worst thing you did in all of this was to challange us.

I get that they cant let the player turn off woman playermodels because its current year so they HAVE to sell skins and letting other players turn off your skin on their client devalues it or something. I accept that. But sweet, sweet jesus, please let me turn off female voices. Titanfall has female playermodels, and guess what? They dont talk. Its perfectly fine. Only the exclusively male grunt npcs and the announcer YOU CHOOSE talk. There are no female voicelines in Titanfall 1 or 2 MP if you simply choose a male announcer. I really barely notice what your character looks like, but i am totally unable to ignore women who will never and have never ressembled anyone who has ever seen combat scream in my ears about tanks or being shot. If i turn down all voices it no longer sounds like combat, its just a weird gunfire dimension, and if i dont over half of the players sound like my little sister getting beat up while commentating a call of duty match. Im not even that sexist, the sound of women getting hurt just bothers me to no end, and the idea russia or america would ever have them on the frontlines in a timeline where they still have modern tanks or aircraft doesnt make any sense. Russia has used most of its modern tanks RIGHT NOW and has millions of men it can burn through before it would start sending women.

>>716232991
Well there it is, I am applying for a job.

>>716232991
the reddit spacing ruins this

>>716233521
it's called a paragraph break, ESLkun

>Teaser drops
>France IMMEDIATELY surrenders the moment NATO is attacked
you can't make this shit up

>>716228240 (OP)
how much is that on real life money?

>>716233024
I fully agree. It was one of my major complaints with BF5, and despite the pushback I received, I knew it was just a ploy to reach a larger audience. It was completely distasteful considering that female gamers largely only play mobile games, and studies have found they spend more than males on microtransactions and virtual currencies.

Coincidental considering BF5 was the first BF to get microtransactions for player skins... It's not solely about inclusivity; it's a calculated effort by the higher-ups to increase their revenue.

>>716234402
but it literally is made up
this isn't a real war retard

>>716236539
Honestly, it's a sneak peek into whatever shit story writing they came up with for the lore of this game.
>storyline focusing on a large-scale conflict between NATO and a powerful private military group called Pax Armata.
>The game will explore the collapse of nations and the rise of private military groups like Pax Armata, who are fighting against NATO. The campaign will draw inspiration from films like "Civil War" and "Lioness", focusing on the experiences of ordinary people caught in extraordinary situations

Isn't this just a more grounded version of 2042 Story?

>>716237473
>Draws inspiration from films like Civil War

So absolute nonsense faggotry?

>>716230482
I'll give it a week until they roll out the out-of-place skins, costumes and cosmetics.

>>716228240 (OP)
Is that a Brooklyn map?

>>716229452
>I'll wait until it drops to $10 in a year
yeah they've really devalued the brand by doing this. I know it will be shit at launch and cheap when it's fixed so why the fuck would I even bother

>>716228240 (OP)
>big multiplayer game
>game succeeds only if there are enough players and full servers
>put premium price tag
Full retard.

I'm gonna pre-order the deluxe edition so hard, because games like this are only fun before sperg meta shit or bug abuse. I'm also going to buy the most obnoxious skin they put out so when I tea-bag people the battlefield vets will get so furious.

Stupid fucks, it's a video game. It's not immersive you're staring at a fucking computer screen and moving a mouse around.

>>716228240 (OP)
Wasn't there already some announcement about Call of Duty games being $80 going forward?
Huh? What do you mean wrong thread? This is Call of Duty Modern Warfare IV isn't it?

>>716239037
This game is essentially EA stating that they can make a better Ground War mode and Battle Royale than Call of Duty.

>this shill thread again

>>716239310
Ok nigger whats it shilling?

>>716229452
>I'll wait until it drops to $10 in a year.
kek this

my problem with Battlefield is why would i buy it when COD has ground war?, all games is camping and sniping people its boring as fuck it doesnt even have 6v6 or 10v10 on small maps

>>716228643
100 million players over the course of it's lifespan is plausable. Usual BF game sells between 20-30M, if BF6 sells similar and F2P battle royale gathers just as much it's 50M from the start.

>>716232437
Nintendo can put out $80 shovelwares such as Mario Kart World and people will just buy it.

>>716241462
>100 million players over the course of it's lifespan is plausable.
nah, it's over

>>716231108
I said the same thing before refunding bf 2042
better wait for it to drop to $10 a year later

I'd rather just go shooting in the desert

anyone got that clip of the spastic omnimovement leak for this game

>>716242451
2042 had around 25M players. You guys don't understand how many people will try out F2P BR and gauntlet modes.

>>716243031
bump

uhh
https://x.com/BFBulletin/status/1948037810201440763

>>716242638
>buy bf3 for 25€
>enjoy it till nerfs and fun removed
>dont buy any other bf for more than 3€

>>716230482
Worse. Swedecucks. They have no soul and are incapable of making good games. Minecraft is the best example of a soulless piece of shit made by a fat whiny faggot. Persson if you are reading this, please kys, no one likes you.

>>716228240 (OP)
DO NOT PREORDER, LET THE BURNED MANCHILDREND ALPHA TEST IT FIRST AND THEN BUY IT FOR HALF THE PRICE KEK

>>716244985
inb4 EA pretends it will be the biggest game ever like always

>>716231219
More like fuck anyone paying more than 59.99 for a video game release. This is all you faggots' fault.

>>716245887
my brother paid 65€ for the new donkey kong
guess sinking 15 years into wow helped me not waste 60€ for new vidya releases

>>716228643
>Remember that EA wanted 100 MILLION players. This is just an excuse to kill DICE and Battlefield forever to focus on slot machines.
Sure thing, especially since EA pissed off 99% of their intended player group.

>>716246052
He paid 5€ too much.
And he will be paying the 70/80/whatever the fuck they price their next exclusives at.

>>716246354
can't disagree with you
doesnt affect me thanks to my huge as fuck backlog and replaying games for jewtube

>>716244236
I don't think any battlefield game has come close to 100m players. It definitely is an uphill battle since 2042 burned a bunch of people.

How can you even be a game developer when you have to waste your time and energy on useless slop that makes society worse?

>>716246592
Nice, just don't ever contribute to this jewery. All I do now is emulate games up to 8th gen while watching the industry crash and burn.

>>716244329
>Pax x NATO bullshit
Yeah it's fucked

>>716244329
Hahaha what the fuck is this? This looks like absolute shit. Pay up faggots, goty for sure.

>>716230482
Seriously, all the brownskins in this board will buy it though.
They heckin loved BF1

>>716247523
100 millions players incoming!

>>716246771
Because none of the BF games had a F2P mode people can try out for free. They don't expect BF mode itself to have 100M players. They expect BR mode to have it.

>>716228240 (OP)
No anon, you just don't understand it. It's a AAAA game, absolutely justifying the cost kek.

>>716244329
DOA.

can't wait to watch more cutscenes when matches start!
just what i wanted. cutscenes in multiplayer games

>>716248069
You'll get ads as well don't worry!

>>716228643
>100 million players at $90 a piece
Yeah nah she's fucking dead Jimbo. We're looking at the Westwood special featuring DICE LA.

>>716230482
>WE ARE BRINGING BACK THE CLASS SYSTEM FELLOW GAMERS
>same meme operator shit from before with even gayer names this time around
Lol
Lmao even

>>716244845
The Swedes made Magicka and Victoria 2, so they're clearly capable of making good games.

>>716228240 (OP)
If this game fails thousands of your countrymen will be out of a job.
You ok with that /v/????

>>716230998
is it 70 bucks on PC? if so thats hilarious
console cucks get cucked again

PLEASE EA, FOR THE LOVE OF GOD

DO NOT ADD COSMETIC/SKIN SLOP LIKE FORTNITE AND COD DOES

NO POP CULTURE SHIT
NO TRIVIA AND CELEBRITY BULLSHIT
NO CROSSOVERS
NO CARTOONS
NO ANIME

>>716250450
>DO NOT ADD COSMETIC/SKIN SLOP LIKE FORTNITE AND COD DOES

>NO POP CULTURE SHIT
>NO TRIVIA AND CELEBRITY BULLSHIT
>NO CROSSOVERS
>NO CARTOONS
>NO ANIME
Not gonna happen, too many good goyim pay too much money for those skins no matter how vocal the playerbase is about such things

>>716250450
didnt 2042 have slop skins?

what's the point of being a cod shill in this day and age?

>>716249625
>Criterion in engl*nd
>DICE in sw*den
>Motive in c*n*da
>Ripple Effect in S*attle and c*n*da

They arent my countrymen. I hope they get mass electrocuted in their offices

>>716250450
2042 has had crossovers.

>>716250450
You know they are going to add everything in this post. Sadly they have to make money and if they aren't following in Fortnite footsteps.
EA CEO is still high on the whole live service train and he wants to make BF into a billion dollar franchise.
Feels like if you want a game like that you are best to look for indies or maybe AA games, since AAA games are so damn big and might as well be a nightmare to even do.

It will be on 50 % discount in six months post launch.

>>716250551
Depends on your definition of slop, here's a list of the cosmetics
https://battlefield.fandom.com/wiki/Battlefield_2042_Customization/Specialists
https://battlefield.fandom.com/wiki/Battlefield_2042_Customization/Weapons
https://battlefield.fandom.com/wiki/Battlefield_2042_Customization/Vehicles

>>716250450
They will acquiesce for launch and the first one or two seasons. Then comes the Beary Best Friend bundle with the teddy bear character skin and a custom gun that causes slain enemies to burst into cotton stuffing.

>>716228240 (OP)
Halo is dead and COD is shell of its former self
BF is the only modern shooter slop out there. It will succeed regardless.

>>716251284

>>716250550
>>716250551
>>716250982
>>716251049
>>716251436
All the good AAA game devs have abandoned me
Now there is no hope

>>716251567
horse

>>716251460
>Halo is dead
True, not sure if it is ever going to recover. Especially with the new direction.
>COD is shell of its former self
Sure but what matters now is bringing in a fuck ton of cash, which CoD is now doing. I think it has generated like 10 Billion over it's lifetime (starting from 2019's cod)
I think BF might as well follow suit and die if they don't nail this game, especially with free alternatives games like Chink Force (Delta force rebooted) and the insane amount of shooter games coming out.

Does anyone know what "Mr. Battlefield" is doing these days? I know he called it quits but what studio bagged him?

>>716250450
that shit will come by the end of christmas. you will see a nicki minaj or snoop dogg skin by next year.

I WILL NOT PAY 80€ FOR A GAME
>>716229452
>DO NOT PRE-ORDER
people still preorder? why? dont they understand that they wont run out of games?

>>716251874
He and other ex-DICE staff went on to found a new studio called 'TTK Games'.
https://x.com/WeAreTTKGames?t=2MLFD9PUd3iAjBrW_VytbQ&s=09

>>716228240 (OP)
Good it will help keep brown thirdies and zoomers out.

'Phantom Edition' cover art leak

>>716250450
They fucking will and you will buy them, goyim.

>>716249412
Just further proves my point kek

>>716252439
Not even slavs will be able to afford it, only white people

>>716252641
>leak
a lot of the lines on the nods and rifle especially make no sense, this is definitely AI

>>716252934
Because the leaked art's original quality looks like this.

>>716252934
It's an AI upscale. If it was a straight AI gen the planes wouldn't look like that.

>>716252641
>>716253057
Looks like shit either way

The gameplay is complete shit, i wouldn't even play this garbage for free.

>>716253220
Try Delta Force if you want to try this trash for free

bump

>>716253689
I've held off from playing Delta Force because it looked like 2042 with slightly better gameplay. How bad is it?

for me it's gonna be 0 dollarinos

gonna pirate that shit day 0

>>716228240 (OP)
If the campaign is good, it has fun multiplayer and a great PvE co-op mode like horde or something, I'll buy it. If it's missing one of those, I won't. Simple as.

>>716250982
This shit was cool
They should do it again

>>716257736
fr

>>716251779
>horse and tank hunter
Best combo

>>716228240 (OP)
I will buy this game because I'm not a fucking racist like all you poltards

>>716228240 (OP)
This will likely include:
1. Campaign
2. Multiplayer
3. DLC Pass for multiple FULL expansions (The team working on this game is the same team that took over BF4 after its launch period and made all the post-release expansion content while casually fixing the game from the ground up)
4. Some new variant of the Battlefield Portal (same team that made portal in the first place), which will let you play maps/vehicles/factions from pretty much any BF game eventually
5. Some kind of 3rd mode, possibly a BR
6. The 3rd mode, and possibly other parts of this list, will likely have a live-service element

Seems pretty fair for what you should expect from a game that will probably have a decade of support, and not the live-service kind of support either

>>716247548
BF1 was a great game though.

>>716237953
I think this is a dated opinion, BF4 (and probably 2042) is what you are thinking of, but this game isn't even made by DICE Sweden
Additionally the team that fixed BF4 are leading this game, and directly involved in the development of the CTE that was created to fix BF4
We are already getting statements about Battlefield Labs, which will contain playable test builds before release, and leaks about an open Beta (probably Labs) that's expected to arrive relatively quickly and far before release. BF Labs is basically CTE 2

The game will probably be fine at launch if Battlefield Studios itself is not mismanaged which is unlikely with Zampella and Byron

>>716244845
I agree but this game isn't even being lead by DICE HQ, which barely exists anymore as most of DICE Sweden's Devs have left to form one or two new companies

>>716244845
Minecraft might be the most SOVLful game ever made

>>716262398
>DLC Pass for multiple FULL expansions
Sorry goy, it's a live service game supported by cosmetic purchases as confirm by the CEO of EA. Have fun with your clown skins once the seasonal battlepasses start rolling in!

>>716263675
If they are abandoning the Premium map/vehicle/weapon model again, then I don't think your interpretation of this is correct, this will probably not be like COD--although given Battlefield Studios direction it's possible--and it probably won't be like 2042 either. This will likely be closer to Tides of War. Which included limited period/theme cosmetics for premium. With all the other post-release content being included for free in a Tides of War model like maps/vehicles/weapons, this would be basically the same as including the Premium lifetime pass (like with BF4) but in a single upfront cost, that would pretty much be the same thing and would be pretty ideal

>>716229836
>Unlike its predecessor, Battlefield 6 will also include a full-fledged single-player campaign. Motive Studios is handling this story, which will be thematically inspired by movies like Civil War and TV shows like Lioness.
>Lioness
Google it and you can expect what it is. They might just front load the dumb shit into singleplayer but even disregarding yas qweening I'm just not going to bother unless:
>Massive sale/deduction in price
>Offense-Defense mode. I forget the term for it in BF1, but where one team defends one attacks. Not the 'constantly run from point to point'
>Gameplay is actually good.

So it won't happen

>>716265206
Premium paid expansion packs are not happening, this isn't 2012 anymore.
The game will be a live service much like BFV and BF2042.

I just don't want operators. I don't care about the classlocked weapons or how ridiculously shitty the campaign will be. Just no operators. Make everyone be a grunt. If you must add cosmetics to appease the shareholders let it be helmets and camouflage and shit whales will still buy it just please no operators. Please no quips. I can't handle another bad battlefield game.

>>716228240 (OP)
I will unironically pay that if its even a half decent shooter. I just want a good military shooter with no cartoon/skin bullshit that I can play in the la-z-boy after work and I will pay exorbitant pricing if its that.

>>716238294
If I can farm lobbies 130:1 in the littlebird this is going to be a deluxe pre-order goyslop edition for me too

>>716228240 (OP)
isn't this going to be the new standard price on console?

>>716265206
EA put Mr. Call of Duty Modern Warfare in charge of the project.
They based their lifetime player target on Call of Duty Warzone's lifetime players.
BF6 is designed to be as close to Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019) as possible while still ostensibly being a Battlefield game.
A F2P battle royale in the style of Call of Duty Warzone is one of the main pillars of the project as a whole.

And you don't think they're going to copy modern Call of Duty's monetization?

>>716229452
Sony will give me the game with PS Plus again and I will enjoy it for free with a high playercount for a few months.

>>716233024
Reminds me of how long it's been since I've played a Battlefield game, not having ever played one where you can play as a female. Fuck that shit. It's stupid, seeing women running around in soldier gear shooting people. Just retarded. Not spending money on any game that does that, ever.

>>716244329
who the fuck gives a shit about the plot... I don't understand releasing this kind of trailer for a multi shooter

>>716244329
So it's Russia but not Russia they don't even have the balls to make it nato vs Russia + China, besides this looks like trash